Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

The research addresses how gender violence against feminists on Twitter during COVID-19 is produced. Mainly focused in the Catalan cultural context, 462,281 attacks on Twitter were analysed, using virtual ethnography and content analysis. We also conducted semi-structured interviews with key agents. This enabled to (1) analyse the profiles of feminists subjected to attacks and those who attack them, (2) identify the characteristics of this violence: how it appears, to which subjects it refers and what the trigger is, (3) identify which axes of inequality intersect in the attacks. The results determine that there are specific typologies of aggressors, that there is a correlation between the political–social agenda and the attacks, essentially on female politicians and journalists and that they tend to happen collectively as personal aggressions that get worse if they intersect with racial issues, for example.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Spanish State Pact (Award UVic-UCC (2022))
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00095_1
2024-01-25
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amnesty International (2018), ‘Troll patrol findings: Using crowdsourcing, data science & machine learning to measure violence and abuse against women on Twitter’, Troll Patrol Findings, 12 December, https://decoders.amnesty.org/projects/troll-patrol/findings. Accessed 15 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, Kim and Jurasz, Olga (2019), ‘Online misogyny: A challenge for digital feminism?’, Journal of International Affairs, 72:2, pp. 95114, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26760834. Accessed 15 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barton, Alana and Storm, Hannah (2014), Violence and Harassment Against Women in the News Media: A Global Picture, International Women’s Media Report and International News Safety Institute, International Women’s Media Foundation, https://www.iwmf.org/resources/violence-and-harassment-against-women-in-the-news-media-a-global-picture/. Accessed 15 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonet-Martí, Jordi (2020), ‘Análisis de las estrategias discursivas empleadas en la construcción de discurso antifeminista en redes sociales’, Psicoperspectivas, 19:3, pp. 5263, https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol19-issue3-fulltext-2040.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonet-Martí, Jordi (2021), ‘Los antifeminismos como contramovimiento: Una revisión bibliográfica de las principales perspectivas teóricas y de los debates actuales’, Teknokultura: Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 18:1, pp. 6171, https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.71303.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Calala Fondo de Mujeres (2020), Las violencias machistas en línea hacia activistas: Datos para entender el fenómeno, Barcelona: Barcelona City Council, https://calala.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/violencias-online-hacia-activistas-calala-2020.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Civila, Sabina, Romero-Rodríguez, Luis M. and Aguaded, Ignacio (2021), ‘Symbolic-discursive violence and new media: An epistemological perspective’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 13:1, pp. 4361, https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00038_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dank, Meredith, Lachman, Pamela, Zweig, Janine M. and Yahner, Jennifer (2014), ‘Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43:5, pp. 84657, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Donestech (2017), Redes Sociales en perspectiva de género: Guía para conocer y contrarrestar las violencias de género on-line, Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía, https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/sites/default/files/2020-04/redessociales.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunn, Suzie (2020), Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence: An Overview, Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation, https://www.cigionline.org/publications/technology-facilitated-gender-based-violence-overview/. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. European Institute of Gender Equality (EIGE) (2017), ‘Gender Equality Index 2017 Report: Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2015’, European Institute of Gender Equality, 10 October, https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equality-index-2017-measuring-gender-equality-european-union-2005-2015-report. Accessed 22 June 2022.
  12. FRA-European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014), Violence against Women: An EU-Wide Survey: Main Results Report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 5 March, https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/violence-against-women-eu-wide-survey-main-results-report. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Freed, Diana, Palmer, Jackeline, Minchala, Diana E., Levy, K., Ristenpart, Thomas and Dell, Nicola (2017), ‘Digital technologies and intimate partner violence: A qualitative analysis with multiple stakeholders’, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1:CSCW, pp. 122, https://doi.org/10.1145/3134681.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. González-Andrio Jiménez, Rocío, Bernal Bravo, César and Palomero Ilardia, Irene M. (2020), ‘Uso de las redes sociales entre los jóvenes y ciudadanía digital: Análisis tras la COVID-19’, Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales, 7:5, pp. 6481, https://doi.org/10.17398/2531-0968.07.64.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hackworth, Lucy (2018), ‘Limitations of “just gender”: The need for an intersectional reframing of online harassment discourse and research’, in J. R. Vickery and T. Everbach (eds), Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 5170, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_3.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Henry, Nicola and Powell, Anastasia (2018), ‘Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research’, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19:2, pp. 195208, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Herrero-Diz, Paula and Ramos-Serrano, Marina (2018), ‘Breaking stereotypes online: Young activists’ use of the internet for social well-being’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 10:1, pp. 99114, https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.10.1.99_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Igareda, Noelia, Pascale, Adrián, Cruells, Marta and Paz, Olga (2019), Les ciberviolències masclistes, Generalitat de Catalunya: Institut Català de les Dones, 30 December, https://dones.gencat.cat/web/.content/03_ambits/docs/cdoc_publicacions_ciberviolencies.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Inter-Parliamentary Union (2016), Sexism, Harassment and Violence Against Women Parliamentarians, Le Grand-Saconnex: Inter Parliament Union, https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/issue-briefs/2016-10/sexism-harassment-and-violence-against-women-parliamentarians. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Iyer, Neema, Nyamwire, Bonnita and Nabulega, Sandra (2020), Alternate Realities, Alternate Internets: African Feminist Research for a Feminist Internet, Ottawa: Association for Progressive Communications, 18 August, https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/alternate-realities-alternate-internets-african-feminist-research-feminist-internet. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, Amy (2017), ‘The multiple harms of sea lions’, in N. J. Reventlow, J. Penney, A. Johnson, R. Junco, C. Tilton, K. Coyer, N. Dad, A. Chaudhri, G. Mutung’u, S. Benesch, A. Lombana-Bermudez, K. Albert, A. Sterzing, F. Oberholzer-Gee, H. Melas, L. Zuleta, S. Kargar and J. Nathan (eds), Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online, Cambridge, MA: Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication, pp. 1315, https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/08/harmfulspeech. Accessed 7 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jorge, Ana and Farrugia, Lorleen (2017), ‘Are victims to blame? Youth, gender and moral discourse on online risk’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 9:2, pp. 28530, https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.9.2.285_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kemp, Sandra (2021), ‘Digital 2021: Global Overview Report: The latest insights into how people around the world use the internet, social media, mobile devices and ecommerce’, We Are Social and Hootsuite, 27 January, https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2021/01/digital-2021-uk/. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Schiffrin, Anya, Lopez, Anamaria, Boulianne, Shelley and Bimber, Bruce (2021), ‘From online political posting to mansplaining: The gender gap and social media in political discussion’, Social Science Computer Review, 39:2, pp. 197210, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319870259.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Larrondo, Ainara, Morales-i-Gras, Jordi and Orbegozo-Terradillos, Julen (2019), ‘Feminist hashtag activism in Spain: Measuring the degree of politicisation of online discourse on #YoSíTeCreo, #HermanaYoSíTeCreo, #Cuéntalo y #NoEstásSola’, Communication and Society, 32:4, pp. 20721, https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.4.207-221.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ledford, Heidi (2020), ‘How Facebook, Twitter and other data troves are revolutionizing social science’, Nature, 582:7812, pp. 32830.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Marwick, Alice E. and Caplan, Robyn (2018), ‘Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment’, Feminist Media Studies, 18:4, pp. 54359, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meyer, Davis S. and Staggenborg, Suzanne (1996), ‘Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity’, American Journal of Sociology, 101:6, pp. 162860, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2782114. Accessed 15 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Núñez Puente, Sonia (2011), ‘Activismo y colectivos en red: Praxis feminista y violencia de género’, Asparkía, 22, pp. 8598.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Núñez-Puente, Sonia and Fernández-Romero, Diana (2018), ‘Discurso visual posmachista en Twitter: Análisis multimodal de la iconicidad de la victimización’, Revista Dígitos, 4:7, pp. 13149, https://doi.org/10.7203/rd.v0i4.127.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Portal Jurídic de Catalunya (2020), ‘Law 17/2020’, Modification of Law 5/2008, Rights of Women to Eradicate Sexist Violence, 22 December, https://portaljuridic.gencat.cat/ca/document-del-pjur/?documentId=889760. Accessed 30 June 2023.
  32. Proyecto Una (2020), Leia, Rihanna & Trump: De cómo el feminismo ha transformado la cultura pop y de cómo el machismo reacciona con terror, Barcelona: Descontrol Editorial.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Turley, Emma and Fisher, Jenny (2018), ‘Tweeting back while shouting back: Social media and feminism activism’, Feminism & Psychology, 28:1, pp. 12832, https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0959353517715875.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Veletsianos, George, Houlden, Shandell, Hodson, Jaigris and Gosse, Chandell (2018), ‘Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance and self-blame’, New Media & Society, 20:12, pp. 4689708, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818781324.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Vergés-Bosch, Nuria and Gil-Juarez, Adriana (2021), ‘Un acercamiento situado a las violencias machistas online y a las formas de contrarrestarlas’, Revista Estudios Feministas, 29:3, pp. 115, https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2021v29n374588.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilk, Adrianne V. (2018), Cyber Violence and Hate Speech Online Against Women, Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/738618. Accessed 8 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zuban, Paula and Rabbia, Hugo H. (2021), ‘Discursos de odio online hacia los feminismos en Argentina’, Revista Inclusive – INADI, 3:6, pp. 3541, https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/inadi-revista-inclusive-n3.pdf. Accessed 8 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00095_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00095_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error