Online news framing of police and protesters in Europe: Press treatment of street demonstrations in London, Athens and Barcelona (2020–21) | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

This study investigates the online news framing of police and protesters in Europe by looking at three late 2020/early 2021 protests: the vigil for Sarah Everard, killed by a police officer, the 47th Athens Polytechnic uprising anniversary rally and the protests against the imprisonment of Catalan rapper Pablo Hasél. A qualitative content analysis was conducted to analyse a sample of 114 articles, gathered from six ideologically opposed news outlets in the three countries. The results indicate that police actions are predominantly located within either the ‘police brutality’ or the ‘order-maintenance’ frame depending on the political orientation of the outlet while the framing of the protesters appears to be more fragmented. Results also suggest that it would be inaccurate to claim that only the right-wing press insulates the police. Overall, this study found media framing to be dependent on the perceived level of deviance of the protest.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00099_1
2024-04-05
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amnesty International (2017), ‘Spain: Excessive use of force by National Police and Civil Guard in Catalonia’, 3 October, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/10/spain-excessive-use-of-force-by-national-police-and-civil-guard-in-catalonia/. Accessed 9 May 2021.
  2. Amnesty International (2021), ‘United Kingdom’, in Amnesty International Report 2020/21: The State of the World’s Human Rights, London: Amnesty International, pp. 37882, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/3202/2021/en/. Accessed 7 March 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arora, M., Phoenix, D. L. P. and Delshad, A. (2018), ‘Framing police and protesters: Assessing volume and framing of news coverage post-Ferguson, and corresponding impacts on legislative activity’, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7:1, pp. 15164, https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1518782.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baranauskas, A. J. (2022), ‘News media and public attitudes toward the protests of 2020: An examination of the mediating role of perceived protester violence’, Criminology & Public Policy, 21:1, pp. 10723.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boykoff, J. (2007), ‘Limiting dissent: The mechanisms of state repression in the USA’, Social Movement Studies, 6:3, pp. 281310, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701666988.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyle, M. P., McLeod, D. M. and Armstrong, C. L. (2012), ‘Adherence to the protest paradigm: The influence of protest goals and tactics on news coverage in U.S. and international newspapers’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17:2, pp. 12744, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211433837.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, D. K. (2021), ‘Police violence and protests: Digital media maintenance of racism, protest repression, and the status quo’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65:1, pp. 15776, https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.1897821.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, D. K. and Harlow, S. (2019), ‘Protests, media coverage, and a hierarchy of social struggle’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24:4, pp. 50830, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219853517.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carragee, K. M. and Roefs, W. (2004), ‘The neglect of power in recent framing research’, Journal of Communication, 52:2, pp. 21433, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chan, W. W. L. (2015), ‘The media representations of police image: Research notes on the Hong Kong’s occupy movement’, Sage Open, 5:3, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015607935.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan, J. M. and Lee, C. C. (1984), ‘Journalistic “paradigms” of civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong’, in A. Arno and W. Dissanayake (eds), The News Media in National and International Conflict, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 183202.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang, H. C. H., Richardson, A. and Ferrara, E. (2022), ‘#JusticeforGeorgeFloyd: How Instagram facilitated the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests’, PLoS ONE, 17:12, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277864.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chermak, S. and Weiss, A. (2005), ‘Maintaining legitimacy using external communication strategies: An analysis of police-media relations’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 33:5, pp. 50112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.06.001.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dijk, T. A. van (2000), ‘New(s) racism: A discourse analytical approach’, in S. Cottle (ed.), Ethnic Minorities and the Media, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 3349.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Entman, R. (1993), ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43:4, pp. 5158, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Entman, R. (2007), ‘Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power’, Journal of Communication, 57:1, pp. 16373.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fairclough, N. (1992), ‘A social theory of discourse’, in Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge and Boston, MA: Polity Press, pp. 62100.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fowler, R. (1991), ‘Ideological roles of the press’, in Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press, New York: Routledge, pp. 12024.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fridkin, K., Wintersieck, A., Courey, J. and Thompson, J. (2017), ‘Race and police brutality: The importance of media framing’, International Journal of Communication, 11, pp. 3394414, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6950/2117. Accessed 14 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, E. (1974), ‘Primary frameworks’, in Frame Analysis, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press Edition, pp. 2140.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, New York: International Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gramsci, A. (2001), ‘(i) History of the Subaltern Classes; (ii) The Concept of “Ideology”; (iii) Cultural Themes: Ideological Material’, in M. G. Durham and D. M. Kellner (eds), Media and Culture Studies: Keywords, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1317.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gregorio, M. Di, Price, S. H., Saunders, C. E. and Brockhaus, M. (2012), Code Book for the Analysis of Media Frames in Articles on REDD, Bogor: CIFOR.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gunther, R., Montero, R. J. and Wert, J. I. (1999), ‘The media and politics in Spain: From dictatorship to democracy’, Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, 78, pp. 146.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J. and Roberts, B. (1978), ‘The social production of news’, in Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 5177.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hallin, D. and Mancini, P. (2004), Comparing Media Systems, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Harlow, S. and Bachmann, I. (2023), ‘Police, violence, and the “logic of damage”: Comparing U.S. and Chilean media portrayals of protests’, Mass Communication and Society, pp. 124, https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2186247.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hess, F. L. (2018), ‘Crisis and the changes in the mediascape: Greece and the globe’, in E. Doxiadis and A. Placas (eds), Living Under Austerity: Greek Society in Crisis, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 14360.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Higgins, K. (2020), ‘Why police violence is a media problem’, Media@LSE blog, 9 June, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2020/06/09/why-police-violence-is-a-media-problem. Accessed 20 April 2021.
  30. Huitsing, Mc K. (2020a), ‘Daily Telegraph (UK)’, Media Bias/Fact Check, 6 May, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-telegraph/. Accessed 9 May 2021.
  31. Huitsing, Mc K. (2020b), ‘El País’, Media Bias/Fact Check, 6 December, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/el-pais/. Accessed 9 May 2021.
  32. Kilgo, D. K. and Harlow, S. (2019), ‘Protests, media coverage, and a hierarchy of social struggle’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24:4, pp. 50830, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219853517.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Krippendorff, K. (2004), ‘Conceptual foundation’, in Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 1839.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lawrence, R. G. (2000), The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality, Berkeley, CA: University California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, F. L. F. (2014), ‘Triggering the protest paradigm: Examining factors affecting news coverage of protests’, International Journal of Communication, 8, pp. 272546, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2873/121. Accessed 9 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Marques, F. P. J. and Mont’Alverne, C. (2019), ‘What are newspaper editorials interested in? Understanding the idea of criteria of editorial-worthiness’, Journalism, 22:7, pp. 181230, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919828503.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mayring, P. (2014), ‘Introduction: Research methods between qualitative and quantitative paradigms’, in Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution, Klagenfurt: GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 615, https://d-nb.info/1191589749/34. Accessed 11 June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McLeod, D. (2007), ‘News coverage and social protest: How the media’s protect paradigm exacerbates social conflict’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 12:1, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McLeod, D. and Hertog, J. K. (1998), ‘Social control and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups: The communicative acts perspective’, in D. Demers and K. Viswanath (eds), Mass Media, Social Control and Social Change, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, pp. 30530.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mjelde, H. (2023), ‘International news media coverage of Black Lives Matter: Evidence from Norway’, International Journal of Communication, 17, pp. 1–21, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19490. Accessed 25 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mourão, R. and Brown, D. K. (2022), ‘Black Lives Matter coverage: How protest news frames and attitudinal change affect social media engagement’, Digital Journalism, 10:4, pp. 62646, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1931900.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mundt, M., Ross, K. and Burnett, C. M. (2018), ‘Scaling social movements through social media: The case of Black Lives Matter’, Social Media + Society, 4:4, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118807911.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mylonas, Y. (2014), ‘Crisis, austerity and opposition in mainstream media discourses of Greece’, Critical Discourse Studies, 11:3, pp. 30521, https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2014.915862.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S. and Nielsen Kleis, R. (2020), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Papanicolaou, G. and Rigakos, G. S. (2021), ‘Greece’s right-wing government is massively expanding police powers’, Jacobin, 3 April, https://jacobinmag.com/2021/04/greece-special-forces-police-university-nd?fbclid=IwAR12HdpPybhXjgzuL-ZSzD5r_5PotYERj0IN-RqnLYR-VIHoDPY9cHQEL6k. Accessed 4 April 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Papathanassopoulos, S. (2019), ‘Greece’, Media Landscapes, 17 May, https://medialandscapes.org/country/greece/media/print. Accessed 9 May 2021.
  47. Poell, T. (2020), ‘Social media, temporality, and the legitimacy of protest’, Social Movement Studies, 19:5–6, pp. 60924, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1605287.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Saldana, J. (2013), Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schreier, M. (2012), Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice, London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Schulenberg, J. L. and Chenier, A. (2014), ‘International protest events and the hierarchy of credibility: Media frames defining the police and protestors as social problems’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 56:3, pp. 26194, https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2012.E12.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Shoemaker, P. J. (1982), ‘The perceived legitimacy of deviant political groups: Two experiments on media effects’, Communication Research, 9:2, pp. 24986.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Shoemaker, P. J. (1984), ‘Media treatment of deviant political groups’, Journalism Quarterly, 61:1, pp. 6682, https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100109.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Strinati, D. (2004), ‘Gramsci’s concept of hegemony’, in An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture, London: Routledge, pp. 15359.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. The Guardian (2008), ‘Political affiliation’, 17 November, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/nov/17/political-affiliation-guardian-observer. Accessed 4 April 2021.
  55. Triandafyllidou, A. (2012), ‘MEDIVA: Newspaper evaluation of Greek newspaper Kathimerini’, MEDIVA Project, 1 April, https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/mediva-newspaper-evaluation-greek-newspaper-kathimerini_en. Accessed 4 April 2021.
  56. Umamaheswar, J. (2020), ‘Policing and racial (in)justice in the media: Newspaper portrayals of the “Black Lives Matter” movement’, Civic Sociology, 1:1, pp. 113, https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.12143.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00099_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00099_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error