Design prototyping as a translational tool for medical device commercialization | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Design, Business & Society
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Design for Medicine and Healthcare
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

Translational design is an increasingly important objective for universities as research institutions are seeking to play a more active role in the commercialization of fundamental medical research. Practice-based designers working within these academic contexts have a skill set that positions them to make a contribution to translating fundamental research into real-world applications. Real world applications of research that are informed by the needs of end-users and actioned through the creation of medical device prototypes. The translational designer’s toolkit includes a range of methodologies, frameworks, procedures and processes to identify problems, conceptualize ideas and create functional prototypes. Progressing research towards commercialization through prototyping is one of the most important skills leveraged by translational design researchers. This article details two case studies of practice-based design research within a large Australian university. It discusses the role of design prototyping as a key part of a lean and integrated development process that relies on accumulative rounds of iteration and interdisciplinary collaboration mediated through artefacts. Design prototyping is used within these projects to bring ideas to life and enable more effective communication between diverse stakeholder groups spanning across academia and industry, and across the boundaries of research and application. This article unpacks the key role of prototyping as a translational tool to iteratively test, refine and conceptually verify ideas, while additionally providing boundary objects for effective communication. This discussion addresses the benefits and limitations of prototyping as a translational tool, including the ability of prototyping to save time and development costs, explore constraints and trade-offs, and communicate with industry partners and end-users through tactile objects and/or real experiences. Design prototyping is an efficient and effective process that embraces failure in early stages of development, where the consequences are limited and the benefit substantial. The article explores how prototyping can provide the backbone to industrial design researchers working in translational contexts to drive development to real-world application and to effectively engage with research end-users.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00012_1
2020-10-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Mackay, W. E.. ( 2009;), ‘ Prototyping tools and techniques. ’, in A. Sears, and J. A. Jacko. (eds), Human-Computer Interaction, London:: CRC Press;, pp. 137–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Berman, J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Connecting with industry: Bridging the divide. ’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30:2, pp. 165–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowen, S.,, Durrant, A.,, Nissen, B.,, Bowers, J., and Wright, P.. ( 2016;), ‘ The value of designers’ creative practice within complex collaborations. ’, Design Studies, 46, pp. 174–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchenau, M., and Suri, J. F.. ( 2000;), ‘ Experience prototyping. ’, in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, August, pp. 424–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chamberlain, P., and Craig, C.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design for health: Reflections from the editors. ’, Design for Health, 1:1, pp. 3–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohrs, R. J.,, Martin, T.,, Ghahramani, P.,, Bidaut, L.,, Higgins, P. J., and Shahzad, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Translational medicine definition by the European Society for Translational Medicine. ’, New Horizons in Translational Medicine, 2:3, pp 86–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Crilly, N., and Firth, R. M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Creativity and fixation in the real world: Three case studies of invention, design and innovation. ’, Design Studies, 64, pp. 169–212.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Design4Health ( 2018), Sheffield Hallam University’s Heart of the Campus building, Sheffield, UK, 4–6 September.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dow, S. P.,, Glassco, A.,, Kass, J.,, Schwarz, M.,, Schwartz, D. L., and Klemmer, S. R.. ( 2012;), ‘ Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ’, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17:18, p. 127–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Drolet, B. C., and Lorenzi, N. M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Translational research: Understanding the continuum from bench to bedside. ’, Translational Research, 157:1, pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Elsen, C.,, Häggman, A.,, Honda, T., and Yang, M. C.. ( 2012;), ‘ Representation in early stage design: An analysis of the influence of sketching and prototyping in design projects. ’, in ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 12–15 August, pp. 737–47, http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2012-70248. Accessed 8 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Findeli, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Searching for design ∼ research questions: Some conceptual clarifications. ’, in R. Chow,, W. Jonas, and G. Joost. (eds), Questions, Hypotheses & Conjectures, Bloomington, IN:: iUniverse;, pp. 278–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Glasgow, R. E., and Emmons, K. M.. ( 2007;), ‘ How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. ’, Annual Review of Public Health, 28:1, pp. 413–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Harman, G., and Harman, K.. ( 2004;), ‘ Governments and universities as the main drivers of enhanced Australian university research commercialisation capability. ’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26:2, pp. 153–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartmann, B.,, Klemmer, S. R.,, Bernstein, M.,, Abdulla, L.,, Burr, B.,, Robinson-Mosher, A., and Gee, J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. ’, in Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology (UIST ’06), New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 299–308.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ingold, T.. ( 2013), Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jang, J., and Schunn, C. D.. ( 2012;), ‘ Physical design tools support and Hinder innovative engineering design. ’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 134:4, April, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005651. Accessed 8 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. John, K. J., and Page, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Design and translational research: A framework to assess the commercial potential of pre-revenue design research projects in Australia. ’, The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 13:2, pp. 11–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lauff, C. A.,, Knight, D.,, Kotys-Schwartz, D., and Rentschler, M. E.. ( 2020;), ‘ The role of prototypes in communication between stakeholders. ’, Design Studies, 66, pp. 1–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Melbourne Now ( 2013), National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia, 22 November–23 March, https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/melbournenow/artists/monash-vision-group-and-monash-art-design-and-architecture.html. Accessed 8 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Menold, J.,, Jablokow, K., and Simpson, T.. ( 2017;), ‘ Prototype for X (PFX): A holistic framework for structuring prototyping methods to support engineering design. ’, Design Studies, 50, pp. 70–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Morris, Z. S.,, Wooding, S., and Grant, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. ’, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104:12, pp. 510–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Norman, D. A.. ( 2010;), ‘ The research-practice gap: The need for translational developers. ’, Interactions, 17:4, pp. 9–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Page, R., and John, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Commercializing academic medical research: The role of the translational designer. ’, The Design Journal, 22:5, pp. 687–705.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanders, E. B. N.. ( 2003;), ‘ From user-centered to participatory design approaches. ’, in F. Jorge. (ed.), Design and the Social Sciences, Boca Raton, FL:: CRC Press;, pp. 18–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Sanders, E. B. N., and Stappers, P. J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. ’, Co-Design, 4:1, pp. 5–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sanders, L., and Stappers, P. J.. ( 2012), Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design, Amsterdam:: BIS Publishers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Searles, A.,, Doran, C.,, Attia, J.,, Knight, D.,, Wiggers, J.,, Deeming, S.,, Mattes, J.,, Webb, B.,, Hannan, S.,, Ling, R., and Edmunds, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact. ’, Health Research Policy and Systems, 14:1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0131-2. Accessed 16 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Steen, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Virtues in participatory design: Cooperation, curiosity, creativity, empowerment and reflexivity. ’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 19:3, pp. 945–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Vialva, T.. ( 2020;), ‘ 3D Hubs 3D printing trends report forecasts 24% growth in 3D printing industry over 5 years. ’, 3D Printing Industry, https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/simscale-closes-e27-million-funding-round-to-expand-cae-platform-167959/. Accessed 1 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wall, M. B.,, Ulrich, K. T., and Flowers, W. C.. ( 1992;), ‘ Evaluating prototyping technologies for product design. ’, Research in Engineering Design, 3:3, pp. 163–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Woolf, S. H.. ( 2008;), ‘ The meaning of translational research and why it matters. ’, JAMA, 299:2, pp. 211–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Page, Rowan, and John, Kieran. ( 2020;), ‘ Design prototyping as a translational tool for medical device commercialization. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 6:2, pp. 215–232, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00012_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00012_1
Loading
Design prototyping as a translational tool for medical device commercialization
Journal of Design, Business & Society 6, 215 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00012_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00012_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00012_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): artefacts; commercialization; industrial design; medical device development; protoypes; translational design

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error