Wittgenstein and censorship | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1757-1952
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1960

Abstract

The current debates around censorship are about more than whether or not censorship is desirable. These debates are also about what counts as censorship. The question of what counts as censorship is a relatively new one since the Liberal conception of censorship was taken as given until the 1980s. Since then, a new approach to understanding censorship has gained momentum. What Matthew Bunn calls ‘New Censorship Theory’ argues that the Liberal conception is far too narrow to properly encompass the vast complexities of censorship. New Censorship Theory does not deny the insights offered by the Liberal conception, but expands upon them. This expansion pushes the notion of censorship out of the censor’s office and into the marketplace, politics and social life. New Censorship Theory also recognizes the way that censorship is both prohibitive and productive. In light of this, some authors have argued that New Censorship Theory overstretches the concept of censorship to such a degree that it risks becoming useless and it risks equating all forms of censorship. Beate Müller borrows the notion of family resemblances from the philosophy of the later Wittgenstein to try to avoid getting stuck in the debates around terminology. She does this by trying to identify the essential elements of censorship, distinguishing between its core and periphery characteristics and by mapping censorial actions and reactions systematically. I argue that Müller uses the philosophy of Wittgenstein to make an anti-Wittgensteinian argument. In order to show why I think that this is the case, I will review the censorship debate before providing my own Wittgensteinian contribution.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00044_1
2022-12-23
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aerts, L.. ( 2021;), ‘ Senator Lee tells DOJ don’t get involved in school board meetings. ’, KSL NewsRadio , 7 October, https://kslnewsradio.com/1957042/lee-tells-doj-dont-get-involved-in-school-board-meetings/. Accessed 2 February 2022.
  2. Aldrich, M. W.. ( 2022;), ‘ Tennessee lawmakers file bill targeting “obscene” books in school libraries. ’, Chalkbeat Tennessee , 28 January, https://tn.chalkbeat.org/2022/1/28/22907090/school-library-book-ban-tennessee-legislation. Accessed 2 February 2022.
  3. Biltereyst, D., and Vande Winkel, R.. ( 2013;), ‘ Silencing cinema: Introduction. ’, in D. Biltereyst, and R. Vande Winkel. (eds), Silencing Cinema: Film Censorship around the World, Global Cinema Series, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, P.. ( 1991), Language and Symbolic Power (ed. J. B. Thompson., trans. G. Raymond, and M. Adamson.), Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunn, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Reimagining repression: New Censorship Theory and after. ’, History and Theory, 54:1, pp. 25–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Burt, R.. ( 1994a;), ‘ Introduction: The “new” censorship. ’, in R. Burt. (ed.), The Administration of Aesthetics: Censorship, Political Criticism, and the Public Sphere, Cultural Politics, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;, pp. xi–xxix.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Burt, R.. ( 1994b;), ‘ (Un)censoring in detail: Thomas Middleton, fetishism, and the regulation of dramatic discourse. ’, in R. Burt. (ed.), The Administration of Aesthetics: Censorship, Political Criticism, and the Public Sphere, Cultural Politics, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;, pp. 17–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, J.. ( 1998;), ‘ Ruled out: Vocabularies of the censor. ’, in R. Post. (ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation, Issues & Debates, Los Angeles, CA:: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities;, pp. 247–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper, R.. ( 2021;), ‘ The conservative assault on civil liberties. ’, The Week, 22 April, https://theweek.com/articles/978659/conservative-assault-civil-liberties. Accessed 2 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Couvares, F. G.. ( 1996;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in F. G. Couvares. (ed.), Movie Censorship and American Culture, Washington, DC:: Smithsonian Institution Press;, pp. 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Eagleton, T.. ( 2005), Figures of Dissent: Critical Essays on Fish, Spivak, Žižek and Others, London:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Epstein, R. J., and Mazzei, P.. ( 2021;), ‘ G.O.P. bills target protesters (and absolve motorists who hit them). ’, New York Times, 21 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/us/politics/republican-anti-protest-laws.html. Accessed 2 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Freshwater, H.. ( 2004;), ‘ Towards a redefinition of censorship. ’, in B. Müller. (ed.), Censorship & Cultural Regulation in the Modern Age, Critical Studies 22, Amsterdam:: Rodopi;, pp. 225–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gabbatt, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ US conservatives linked to rich donors wage campaign to ban books from schools. ’, The Guardian, 24 January, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jan/24/us-conservatives-campaign-books-ban-schools. Accessed 2 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilbert, N.. ( 2012), Better Left Unsaid: Victorian Novels, Hays Code Films, and the Benefits of Censorship, The Cultural Lives of Law, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Green, J., and Karolides, N. J.. ( 2005), The Encyclopedia of Censorship, , rev. ed.., Facts on File Library of World History, New York:: Facts On File;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Holquist, M.. ( 1994;), ‘ Introduction: Corrupt originals: The paradox of censorship. ’, PMLA, 109:1, pp. 14–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Jansen, S. C.. ( 1991), Censorship: The Knot that Binds Power and Knowledge, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jansen, S. C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Ambiguities and imperatives of market censorship: The brief history of a critical concept. ’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 7:2, pp. 12–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kallio, A. A.. ( 2015), Navigating (Un)Popular Music in the Classroom: Censure and Censorship in an Inclusive, Democratic Music Education, Helsinki:: Sebelius Academy;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kripke, S. A.. ( 2000), Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuhn, A.. ( 1988), Cinema, Censorship, and Sexuality, 1909–1925, Cinema and Society, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Lee bill protects schools from Critical Race Theory. ’, Mike Lee , 11 August, https://www.lee.senate.gov/2021/8/sen-lee-votes-against-1-200-000-000-000-bill/df6d5a93-3a10-4b8b-8ef2-931ae053eda5. Accessed 2 February 2022.
  24. Lubin, A.. ( 1941), In the Navy, USA:: Universal Pictures;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Marcus, J.. ( 2021;), ‘ Conservatives outraged that anti-trans book removed from Amazon. ’, The Independent, 26 February, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/amazon-transgender-book-ryan-anderson-b1805917.html. Accessed 2 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Milligan, B.. ( 2016;), ‘ Millions have less than £100 in savings, study finds. ’, BBC News , 29 September, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37504449. Accessed 26 October 2020.
  27. Müller, B.. ( 2004;), ‘ Censorship and cultural regulation: Mapping the territory. ’, in B. Müller. (ed.), Censorship & Cultural Regulation in the Modern Age, Critical Studies, vol. 22, Amsterdam:: Rodopi;, pp. 1–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. O’Connell, O.. ( 2020;), ‘ Senator Mike Lee says fact-checking is form of censorship. ’, The Independent, 29 October, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/senator-mike-lee-censorship-fact-checking-twitter-facebook-google-b1431637.html. Accessed 13 November 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Pleasants, N.. ( 1999), Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar, Routledge Studies in Social and Political Thought, vol. 15, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Post, R.. ( 1998;), ‘ Censorship and silencing. ’, in R. Post. (ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation, Issues & Debates, Los Angeles, CA:: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities;, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Reed, B.. ( 2021;), ‘ Trump’s new social media platform will bar users from making “disparaging” comments about it. ’, Salon , 21 October, https://www.salon.com/2021/10/21/new-social-media-platform-will-bar-users-from-making-disparaging-comments-about-it_partner/. Accessed 2 February 2022.
  32. Rieger, J. M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Republicans claim they are being silenced as they speak to millions of viewers. ’, Washington Post, 4 February, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/04/republicans-claim-they-are-being-silenced-they-speak-millions-viewers/. Accessed 2 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Schauer, F.. ( 1998;), ‘ The ontology of censorship. ’, in R. Post. (ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation, Issues and Debates, Los Angeles, CA:: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities;, pp. 89–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Schiller, E.. ( 1975), Official Rules of Chess, New York:: McKay;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Shuger, D.. ( 1998;), ‘ Civility and censorship in early modern England. ’, in R. Post. (ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation, Issues & Debates , Los Angeles, CA:: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities;, pp. 89–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Strauss, L.. ( 1988), Persecution and the Art of Writing, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Wittgenstein, L.. ( 2008), On Certainty (trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, and D. Paul.), Oxford:: Blackwell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wittgenstein, L.. ( 2009), Philosophical Investigations, , rev. 4th ed.. (trans. G. E. M. Anscombe,, P. M. S. Hacker, and J. Schulte.), Chichester:: Wiley-Blackwell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Woodward, J.. ( 2008), Low and Micro-budget Film Production in the UK, London:: UK Film Council;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Žižek, S.. ( 2000), The Art of the Ridiculous Sublime: On David Lynch’s Lost Highway, Seattle, WA:: University of Washington Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Gould, David. ( 2022;), ‘ Wittgenstein and censorship. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 13:2, pp. 97–115, https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00044_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00044_1
Loading
Wittgenstein and censorship
Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 13, 97 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00044_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00044_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ejpc_00044_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Beate Müller; censorship; family resemblances; film; forms of life; language games; rule following; Wittgenstein

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error