On the communicative intent of Augustine’s Confessions

References

1. Anderson, Linda. ( 2001), Autobiography, London and New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Augustine ( 2001), The Confessions, London:: Everyman Publishers plc;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett, Andrew. ( 2005), The Author, London:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, Peter. ( 1967), Augustine of Hippo: A Biography, London:: Faber and Faber;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clark, Elizabeth A.. ( 2005;), ‘ On not retracting the unconfessed. ’, in J. D. Caputo, and J. M. Scanlon. (eds), Augustine and Postmodernism, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;, pp. 222–43.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark, Gillian. ( 2005), Augustine the Confessions, Exeter:: University of Exeter Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dodds, Eric R.. ( 1928;), ‘ Augustine’s Confession: A study in spiritual maladjustment. ’, Hibbert Journal, 26, pp. 459–74.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Douglas, Laurie. ( 1996;), ‘ Voice re-cast: Augustine’s use of conversation in De Ordine and The Confessions. ’, Augustiian Studies, 27, pp. 39–54.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Forman, Robert J.. ( 1995), Augustine and the Making of a Cristian Literature, New York:: E. Mellen Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Foucault, Michel. ( 1997;), ‘ Subjectivity and truth. ’, in S. Lotringer. (ed.), The Politics of Truth, Los Angeles, CA:: Semiotext(e);, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Feldman, Erich. ( 1994;), ‘ Confessiones. ’, in K. Heinz. (ed.), Augustinus-Lexikon, vol. 1, Basel:: Schwabe;, pp. 1134–93.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fleishman, Avrom. ( 1983), Figures of Autobiography: The Language of Self-Writing in Victorian and Modern England, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fredriksen, Paula. ( 1986;), ‘ Paul and Augustine: Conversion narratives, orthodox traditions, and the retrospective self. ’, Journal of Theological Studies, 37:1, pp. 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kotzé, Annemaré. ( 2004), Augustine’s Confessions: Communicative Purpose and Audience, Leiden:: Brill;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Marrou, Henri. ( 1957), St Augustine, London:: Longmans;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. McWilliam, Joanne. ( 1992), Augustine from Rhetor to Theologian, Waterloo:: Wilfred Laurier University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Nock, Arthur Darby. ( 1952), Conversion: The Old and the New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. O’Donnell, James J.. ( 2005;), ‘ Augustine’s unconfessions. ’, in J. D. Caputo, and J. M. Scanlon. (eds), Augustine and Postmodernism, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;, pp. 212–21.
    [Google Scholar]
19. O’Meara, John J.. ( 1965), The Young Augustine, New York:: Alba House;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pusey, Edward B.. ( 1949;), ‘ Preface. ’, in The Confessions of St Augustine, London:: Thomas Nielson and Sons;, pp. v–xxxv.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Smith, Sidonie, and Watson, Julia. ( 2001), Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Stanley, Liz. ( 1992), The Autobiographical I: The Theory and Practice of Feminist Auto/biography, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sturrock, John. ( 1993), The Language of Autobiography, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Tambling, Jeremy. ( 1990), Confession: Sexuality, Sin, the Subject, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Taylor, Chloë. ( 2009), The Culture of Confession from Augustine to Foucault, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Wright, Douglas Glen. ( 2001;), ‘ Ghost writers: Theories and strategies of communication in the autobiographies of Augustine, Descartes, Rousseau, and Nietzsche. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, Toronto:: University of Toronto;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wright, Terry R.. ( 1998), Theology and Literature, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mangion, Claude. ( 2022;), ‘ On the communicative intent of Augustine’s Confessions. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 13:2, pp. 153–66, https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00047_1
    [Google Scholar]