Protecting democracy from disinformation: Implications for a model of communication

References

1. Barberá, Pablo,, Jost, John T.,, Nagler, Jonathan,, Tucker, Joshua A., and Bonneau, Richard. ( 2015;), ‘ Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?. ’, Psychological Science, 26:10, pp. 1531–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brennen, J. Scott,, Simon, Felix,, Howard, Philip N., and Nielsen, Rasmus Klein. ( 2020;), ‘ Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. ’, Reuters Institute, 7 April, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation. Accessed 12 September 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cardenal, Ana Sofia,, Aguilar-Paredes, Carlos,, Cristancho, Camilo, and Majó-Vázquez, Silvia. ( 2019;), ‘ Echo-chambers in online news consumption: Evidence from survey and navigation data in Spain. ’, European Journal of Communication, 34:4, pp. 360–76, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119844409.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carey, James W.. ( 1989;), ‘ A cultural approach to communication. ’, in J. W. Carey. (ed.), Communication as Culture, Boston, MA:: Unwin Hyman;, pp. 13–36.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carrieri, Vicenzo,, Madio, Leonardo, and Principe, Francesco. ( 2019;), ‘ Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi-experimental evidence from Italy. ’, Health Economics, 28:11, pp. 1377–82, https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3937.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chambers, Simone. ( 2021;), ‘ Truth, deliberative democracy, and the virtues of accuracy: Is fake news destroying the public sphere?. ’, Political Studies, 69:1, pp. 147–63, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890811.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cook, John,, Ellerton, Peter, and Kinkead, David. ( 2018;), ‘ Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. ’, Environmental Research Letters, 13:2, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cook, John, and Lewandowsky, Stephan. ( 2016;), ‘ Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks. ’, Topics in Cognitive Science, 8:1, pp. 160–79, https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12186.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crozier, William E., and Strange, Deryn. ( 2019;), ‘ Correcting the misinformation effect. ’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33:4, pp. 585–95, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3499.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dretske, Fred. ( 1988), Explaining Behaviour: Reasons in a World of Causes, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Elsasser, Shaun W., and Dunlap, Riley E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. ’, American Behavioral Scientist, 57:6, pp. 754–76, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469800.
    [Google Scholar]
12. European Commission ( 2018;), ‘ A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent high level group on fake news and online disinformation. ’, European Commission, Luxembourg:: Publications Office of the European Union;, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6ef4df8b-4cea-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 18 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Froehlich, Thomas. ( 2017;), ‘ A not-so-brief account of current information ethics: The ethics of ignorance, missing information, misinformation, disinformation and other forms of deception or incompetence. ’, BiD: textos, universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, 39, http://dx.doi.org/10.1344/BiD2017.39.8.
    [Google Scholar]
14. González-Andrío Jiménez, Rocío,, Bernal Bravo, César,, Palomero, Ilardia, and Irene, Magdalena. ( 2020;), ‘ Uso de las redes sociales entre los jóvenes y ciudadanía digital: Análisis tras la COVID-19. ’, REIDICS, 7, pp. 64–81, https://doi.org/10.17398/2531-0968.07.64.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Habermas, Jürgen. ( 1962), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Habermas, Jürgen. ( 2006;), ‘ Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension. ’, The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research: Communication Theory, 16:4, pp. 411–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Haidt, Jonathan. ( 2001;), ‘ The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. ’, Psychological Review, 108:4, pp. 814–34, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haidt, Jonathan. ( 2006), The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Haidt, Jonathan. ( 2012), The Righteous Mind: How Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion, New York:: Pantheon Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. House of Commons ( 2019;), ‘ Disinformation and “fake news”: Final report – Eighth report of session 2017–19. ’, London:: House of Commons;, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/1791.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hull, D.. ( 1988), Science As a Process, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kahan, Dan M.,, Jenkins-Smith, Hank, and Barman, Donald. ( 2011;), ‘ Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. ’, Journal of Risk Research, 14:2, pp. 147–74.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kapantai, Eleni,, Christopoulou, Androniki,, Berberidis, Christos, and Peristeras, Vassilios. ( 2020;), ‘ A systematic literature review on disinformation: Toward a unified taxonomical framework. ’, New Media & Society, 23:5, pp. 1301–26, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820959296.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lakatos, Imre. ( 1976;), ‘ Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. ’, in S. G. Harding. (ed.), Can Theories Be Refuted?, Dordrecht:: Springer;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lasswell, Harold. ( 1927;), ‘ The theory of political propaganda. ’, American Political Science Review, 21, pp. 627–31.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lasswell, Harold. ( 1934), World Politics and Personal Insecurity, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lewandowsky, Stephan,, Ecker, Ullrich K., and Cook, John. ( 2017a;), ‘ Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. ’, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6:4, pp. 353–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lewandowsky, Stephan,, Ecker, Ullrich K., and Cook, John. ( 2017b;), ‘ Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. ’, PLOS ONE, 12:5, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lewandowsky, Stephan,, Ecker, Urlich K.,, Seifert, Colleen M.,, Schwarz, Norbert, and Cook, John. ( 2012;), ‘ Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. ’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13:3, pp. 106–31, https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lilleker, Darren G., and Liefbroer, Mirjam. ( 2018;), ‘ “Searching for something to believe in”: Voter uncertainty in a post-truth environment. , International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 14:3, pp. 351–66, https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.14.3.351_1.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lippman, Walter. ( 1922), Public Opinion, New York:: Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mason, Lance E.,, Krutka, Dan, and Stoddard, Jeremy. ( 2018;), ‘ Media literacy, democracy, and the challenge of fake news. ’, Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10:2, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-2-1.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mayo, Ruth,, Alfasi, Dana, and Schwarz, Norbert. ( 2014;), ‘ Distrust and the positive test heuristic: Dispositional and situated social distrust improves performance on the Wason Rule Discovery Task. ’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143:3, pp. 985–90, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035127.
    [Google Scholar]
34. McCright, Aaron M., and Dunlap, Riley E.. ( 2011;), ‘ The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. ’, The Sociological Quarterly, 52:2, pp. 155–94, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McDermott, Rose. ( 2019;), ‘ Psychological underpinnings of post-truth in political beliefs. ’, PS, Political Science & Politics, 52:2, pp. 218–22, https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800207X.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mercier, Hugo, and Sperber, Dan. ( 2011;), ‘ Why do humans reason: Arguments for an argumentative theory. ’, Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 34, pp. 57–74.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mercier, Hugo, and Sperber, Dan. ( 2017), The Enigma of Reason, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Millikan, Ruth. ( 1984), Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mouffe, Chantal. ( 1999), El retorno de lo político: Comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo, democracia radica, Barcelona:: Paidós Ibérica;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. ( 2010;), ‘ When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. ’, Political Behaviour, 32, pp. 303–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Oxford Dictionary ( 2016;), ‘ Word of the year. ’, 16 November, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016. Accessed 2 July 2021.
42. Pérez Zafrilla, Pedro Jesús. ( 2013;), ‘ Implicaciones normativas de la psicología moral: Jonathan Haidt y el desconcierto moral: Deimon. ’, Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 59, pp. 9–25.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Peters, Uwe. ( 2020;), ‘ What is the function of confirmation bias?. ’, Erkenntinis, 87, pp. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00252-1.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Popper, Karl. ( 1975;), ‘ The rationality of scientific revolutions. ’, in R. Harre. (ed.), Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Post, Senja. ( 2019;), ‘ Polarizing communication as media effects on antagonists: Understanding communication in conflicts in digital media societies. ’, Communication Theory, 29:2, pp. 213–35, https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty022.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Radford, Gary. ( 2005), On the Philosophy of Communication, Florence:: Wadsworth Publishing Company;.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Roozenbeek, Jon, and van der Linden, Sander. ( 2019;), ‘ Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. ’, Palgrave Communications, 5:1, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Salaverría, Ramón,, Buslón, Nataly,, López-Pan, Fernando,, León, Bienvenido,, López-Goñi, Ignacio, and Erviti, María-Carmen. ( 2020;), ‘ Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: Tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19. ’, El profesional de la información (EPI), 29:3, https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.15.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sánchez, Lydia. ( 2020;), ‘ Epistemología y ciencias sociales en la era de la anti-ilustración. ’, in J. Prats. (ed.), Ciencias sociales, ciudadanía y sociedad digital: Reflexiones desde la educación, Gijón:: Editorial Trea;.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sánchez, Lydia, and Campos, Manuel. ( 2009;), ‘ Content and sense. ’, Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 1:1, pp. 75–90, https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.1.1.75/1.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Shannon, Claude, and Weaver, Warren. ( 1963), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana, IL and Chicago, IL:: Illinois University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Spohr, Dominic. ( 2017;), ‘ Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. ’, Business Information Review, 34:3, pp. 150–60, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722446.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Stroud, Natali Jomini. ( 2010;), ‘ Polarization and partisan selective exposure. ’, Journal of Communication, 60:3, pp. 556–76, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Thorson, Emily. ( 2016;), ‘ Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. ’, Political Communication, 33:3, pp. 460–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187.
    [Google Scholar]
55. van Zoonen, Liesbet. ( 1994;), ‘ A “new” paradigm?. ’, in D. McQuail. (ed.), McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory, London:: Sage Publications;, pp. 48–59.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Wardle, Clare, and Derakhshan, Hossein. ( 2017;), ‘ Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. ’, Council of Europe Report, 27, pp. 1–107, https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c. Accessed 13 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]