Towards a new understanding of information effects on discourses and practices: The role of online newspapers in sustainable household changes

References

1. Altheide, David L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Media logic and social power. ’, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3:2, pp. 119–36.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Altheide, David L.. ( 2013;), ‘ Media logic, social control, and fear. ’, Communication Theory, 23:3, pp. 223–38.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, Alison. ( 2009;), ‘ Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. ’, Sociology Compass, 3:2, pp. 166–82.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Audiweb ( 2018;), ‘ Sintesi dei dati Giugno 2018. ’, June, http://www.audiweb.it/dati/sintesi-dei-dati-giugno2018.html. Accessed 10 June 2019.
5. Barnes, Barry. ( 2001;), ‘ Practice as collective action. ’, in T. Schatzki,, K. Knorr Cetina, and E. von Savigny. (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London:: Routledge;, pp. 17–28.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bryant, Jennings, and Oliver, Mary B.. (eds) ( 2009), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, New York and London:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cacciatore, Michael A.,, Scheufele, Dietram A., and Iyengar, Shanto. ( 2016;), ‘ The end of framing as we know it… and the future of media effects. ’, Mass Communication and Society, 19:1, pp. 7–23.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carvalho, Anabela, and Burgess, Jacquelin. ( 2005;), ‘ Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. ’, Risk Analysis, 25:6, pp. 1457–69.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. ( 2007;), ‘ Framing theory. ’, Annual Review of Political Science, 10:1, pp. 103–26.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cohen, Bernhard C.. ( 1963), The Press and Foreign Policy, New York:: Harcourt;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Couldry, Nick. ( 2008;), ‘ Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. ’, New Media & Society, 10:3, pp. 373–91.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Couldry, Nick. ( 2012), Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Couldry, Nick, and Hepp, Andreas. ( 2013;), ‘ Conceptualizing mediatization: Context, traditions, arguments. ’, Communication Theory, 23:3, pp. 191–202.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Deacon, David, and Stanyer, James. ( 2014;), ‘ Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon?. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 36:7, pp. 1032–44.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Druckman, James N.. ( 2001;), ‘ The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. ’, Political Behavior, 23:3, pp. 225–56.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Elias, Norbert. ( 1990), The Symbol Theory, London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ferree, Myra M.,, Gamson, William A.,, Gerhards, Jürgen, and Rucht, Dieter. ( 2002), Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ferrucci, Martina, and Petersen, Lars K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Do online newspapers have an impact on people’s routines? Digital information and (best) sustainable practices in Italy. ’, The 2017 Conference on Communication and Environment in Leicester. Democracy, Borders and Public/Political Engagement: Challenges for Environmental Communication, University of Leicester;, Leicester:, 30 June.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fontana, Renato,, D’Antonio, Vera,, Ferrucci, Martina, and Piscopo, Carmine. ( 2017;), ‘ The reaction of social partners to the application of the “Jobs Act”: A comparison between digital communication strategies. ’, in C. Larsen,, S. Rand,, A. Schmid,, T. Nagel, and H. Heike. (eds), The Importance of Governance in Regional Labour Market Monitoring for Evidence-Based Policy-Making, Augsburg and Munich:: Rainer Hampp Verlag;, pp. 115–46.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Futerra ( 2005), The Rules of the Game: The Principals of Climate Change Communication, London:: Climate Change Communications Working Group;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gerbner, George. ( 1998;), ‘ Cultivation analysis: An overview. ’, Mass Communication and Society, 1:3&4, pp. 175–94.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gerbner, George,, Gross, Larry,, Morgan, Michael, and Signorielli, Nancy. ( 1986;), ‘ Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. ’, in J. Bryant, and D. Zillman. (eds), Perspectives on Media Effects, Hilldale, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;, pp. 17–40.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gram-Hanssen, Kirsten. ( 2009;), ‘ Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. ’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14:1, pp. 150–65.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hargreaves, Tom. ( 2011;), ‘ Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. ’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 11:1, pp. 79–99.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hjarvard, Stig. ( 2012;), ‘ Doing the right thing: Media and communication studies in a mediatized world. ’, Nordicom Review, 33 (Supplement 1), pp. 27–34.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Huang, Guangyu. ( 1995;), ‘ A comparison between media frames and audience frames: The case of the Hill–Thomas controversy. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Inglisa, Maria. ( 2008), La rappresentazione dei cambiamenti climatici nei media italiani, (‘The representation of climate change in Italian media’) , Milan:: Ibis;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jeffres, Leo W.,, Neuendorf, Kimberly, and Atkin, David J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Acquiring knowledge from the media in the Internet age. ’, Communication Quarterly, 60:1, pp. 59–79.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Jowett, Garth S., and O’ Donnell, Victoria. ( 1986;), ‘ Media violence and anti-social behaviour. ’, Journal of Social Issues, 42:3, pp. 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Matthes, Jörg. ( 2012;), ‘ Framing politics: An integrative approach. ’, American Behavioral Scientist, 56:3, pp. 247–59.
    [Google Scholar]
31. McCombs, Maxwell, and Shaw, Donald L.. ( 1972;), ‘ The agenda setting function of mass media. ’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36:2, pp. 176–87.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nerlich, Brigitte,, Koteyko, Neyla, and Brown, Brian. ( 2010;), ‘ Theory and language of climate change communication. ’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1:1, pp. 97–110.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nicolini, Davide. ( 2012), Practice Theory, Work, & Organization: An Introduction, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Nisbet, Matthew C.,, Scheufele, Dietram A.,, Shanahan, James,, Moy, Patricia,, Brossard,, Dominique, and Lewenstein, Bruce V.. ( 2002;), ‘ Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. ’, Communication Research, 29:5, pp. 584–608.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. ( 1974;), ‘ The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. ’, Journal of Communication, 24:2, pp. 43–52.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pasquaré, Federico A., and Oppizzi, Paolo. ( 2012;), ‘ How do the media affect public perception of climate change and geohazards? An Italian case study. ’, Global and Planetary Change, 90:91, pp. 152–57.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Petersen, Lars K.. ( 2013;), ‘ The materiality of everyday practices in urban greenspace. ’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 15:3, pp. 353–70.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reckwitz, Andreas. ( 2002a;), ‘ Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. ’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5:2, pp. 243–63.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Reckwitz, Andreas. ( 2002b;), ‘ The status of the “material” in theories of culture: From “social structure” to “artefacts”. ’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32:2, pp. 195–217.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schatzki, Theodore R.. ( 2005;), ‘ Practice mind-ed orders. ’, in T. R. Schatzki,, K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny. (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London:: Routledge;, pp. 50–63.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Scheufele, Dietram A.. ( 2000;), ‘ Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. ’, Mass Communication & Society, 3:2&3, pp. 297–316.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Shove, Elizabeth,, Pantzar, Mika, and Watson, Matt. ( 2012), The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes, London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Strömbäck, Jesper. ( 2008;), ‘ Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. ’, Press/Politics, 13:3, pp. 228–46.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Thompson, John B.. ( 1990), Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication, Cambridge:: Polity;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Thussu, Daya K.. (ed.) ( 2009), Internationalizing Media Studies, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. United Nations ( 2015;), ‘ About the sustainable development goals. ’, United Nations;, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 10 June 2019.
47. Warde, Alan. ( 2005;), ‘ Consumption and theories of practice. ’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5:2, pp. 131–53.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wenger, Étienne. ( 1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Witschge, Tamara. ( 2014;), ‘ Passive accomplice or active disruptor: The role of audiences in the mediatization of politics. ’, Journalism Practice, 8:3, pp. 342–56.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ferrucci, M., and Petersen, L. K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Towards a new understanding of information effects on discourses and practices: The role of online newspapers in sustainable household changes. ’, Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 10:1&2, pp. 129–146, doi: 10.1386/iscc.10.1-2.129_1
    [Google Scholar]