Snapchat: A space for intimate and boundary-pushing transactions | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture
  4. Volume 11, Issue 3
  5. Article
Childhoods in Transition: Mediating “In-Between Spaces”
  • ISSN: 1757-2681
  • E-ISSN: 1757-269X

Abstract

This article explores how young adults negotiate gender relations and intimate boundaries through the smartphone app, Snapchat. We build on an empirical study based on interviews and a quantitative questionnaire distributed among young Danes. Our findings suggest that the key affordance of Snapchat (its default deletion) creates ‘in between spaces’ as it incites a high degree of boundary-pushing content. The way the content pushes boundaries varies across genders, but a common characteristic is that the content is more intimate and with less facade than what is usually shared on other social media. At the same time, we find that young males and females to some extend use Snapchat in different ways and with different kinds of content, though for the same overall purpose; Snapchat constitutes their ‘in between space’ where they can test boundaries and uphold social relations by exchanging personal, unveiled behind-the-facade content.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00031_1
2020-12-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abeele, Mariek M. P. Vanden. ( 2014;), ‘ Mobile lifestyles: Conceptualizing heterogeneity in mobile youth culture. ’, New Media & Society, 18:6, pp. 908–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alasuutari, Pertti. ( 2000), Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies, London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bannon, Liam J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: The duality of memory and implications for ubiquitous computing. ’, CoDesign, 2:1, pp. 3–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron, Naomi S.. ( 2010;), ‘ Are instant messages speech?. ’, in J. Hunsinger,, L. Klastrup, and A. Matthew. (eds), International Handbook of Internet Research, New York:: Springer;, pp. 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayer, Joseph B.,, Ellison, Nicole B.,, Schoenebeck, Sarita Y., and Falk, Emily B.. ( 2016;), ‘ Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 19:7, pp. 956–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baym, Nancy K., and boyd, danah. ( 2012;), ‘ Socially mediated publicness: An introduction. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56:3, pp. 320–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beatty, Paul C., and Willis, Gordon B.. ( 2007;), ‘ Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. ’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 71:2, pp. 287–311.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. boyd, danah. ( 2011;), ‘ Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. ’, in Z. Papacharissi. (ed.), Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 39–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. boyd, danah, and Ellison, Nicole B.. ( 2007;), ‘ Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13:1, pp. 210–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brügger, Niels. ( 2002;), ‘ Theoretical reflections on media and media history. ’, in N. Brügger, and S. Kolstrup. (eds), Media History: Theories, Methods, Analysis, Aarhus:: Aarhus Universitetsforlag;, pp. 33–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bruns, Axel. ( 2008), Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage, New York:: Peter Lang;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruns, Axel, and Liang, Yuxian Eugene. ( 2012;), ‘ Tools and methods for capturing Twitter data during natural disasters. ’, First Monday, 17:4, n.pag., 2 April, https://firstmonday.org/article/view/3937/3193. Accessed 10 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bryman, Alan. ( 2016), Social Research Methods, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Castells, Manuel,, Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia,, Linchuan Qiu, Jack, and Sey, Araba. ( 2007), Mobile Communication and Society – A Global Perspective, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Charmaz, Kathy. ( 2000;), ‘ Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. ’, in N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;, pp. 509–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Crawford, Kate. ( 2009;), ‘ These foolish things: On intimacy and insignificance in mobile media. ’, in G. Goggin, and L. Hjorth. (eds), Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunication to Media, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 252–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Creswell, John W., and Clark, Vicki L. Plano. ( 2011), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Los Angeles, CA:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Deacon, David,, Murdock, Graham,, Pickering, Michael, and Golding, Peter. ( 2007), Researching Communications: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media and Cultural Analysis, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Forsman, Michael. ( 2016;), ‘ Selfies som visuellt småprat. ’, Nordicom Information, 38:2, pp. 82–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Geertz, Clifford. ( 1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, New York:: Basic;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Goggin, Gerard, and Hjorth, Larissa. (eds) ( 2009), Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunication to Media, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Goggin, Gerard, and Hjorth, Larissa. ( 2009;), ‘ The question of mobile media. ’, in G. Goggin, and L. Hjorth. (eds), Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunication to Media, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 3–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Goggin, Gerard, and Hjorth, Larissa. (eds) ( 2014), The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Handyside, Sarah, and Ringrose, Jessica. ( 2017;), ‘ Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: Mediated temporality, duration and affect. ’, Journal of Gender Studies, 26:3, pp. 347–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jensen, Jakob Linaa, and Tække, Jesper. ( 2018), Sociale Medier, Copenhagen:: Samfundslitteratur;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. (ed.) ( 2012), A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Katz, James E., and Crocker, Elizabeth Thomas. ( 2015;), ‘ Selfies and photo messaging as visual conversation: Reports from the United States, United Kingdom and China. ’, International Journal of Communication, 9:1, pp. 1861–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kofoed, Jette, and Larsen, Malene Charlotte. ( 2016;), ‘ A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media. ’, First Monday, 21:11, n.pag., 11–17 November, https://firstmonday.org/article/view/6905/5648. Accessed 22 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kusumasondjaja, Sony, and Tjiptono, Fandy. ( 2019;), ‘ Endorsement and visual complexity in food advertising on Instagram. ’, Internet Research, 29:4, pp. 659–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ling, Rich. ( 2009;), ‘ Mobile communication and teen emancipation. ’, in G. Goggin, and L. Hjorth. (eds), Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunication to Media, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 50–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ling, Rich. ( 2014;), ‘ Theorizing mobile communication in the intimate sphere. ’, in G. Goggin, and L. Hjorth. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 32–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Livingstone, Sonia. ( 2008;), ‘ Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. ’, New Media & Society, 10:3, pp. 393–411.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Livingstone, Sonia,, Mascheroni, Giovanna, and Staksrud, Elisabeth. ( 2015), Developing a Framework for Researching Children’s Online Risks and Opportunities in Europe, London:: EU Kids Online;, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64470/. Accessed 17 September 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lobinger, Katharina. ( 2016;), ‘ Photographs as things – Photographs of things. A texto-material perspective on photo-sharing practices. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 19:4, pp. 475–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mascheroni, Giovanna, and Ólafsson, Kjartan. ( 2014), Net Children Go Mobile: Risks and Opportunities, Milano:: Educatt;.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor. ( 2009), Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Rettberg, Jill Walker. ( 2016;), ‘ What if the web is almost over?. ’, jill/txt , 22 May, http://jilltxt.net/?p=4492. Accessed 17 September 2019.
  38. Rice, Lindsay, and Markey, Patrick M.. ( 2009;), ‘ The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions. ’, Personality and Individual Differences, 46:1, pp. 35–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Teddlie, Charles, and Tashakkori, Abbas. ( 2009), Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Vaterlaus, Mitchell J.,, Barnett, Kathryn,, Roche, Cesia, and Young, Jimmy A.. ( 2016;), ‘ “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviours and young adult interpersonal relationships. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 62, pp. 594–601.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Velez, Emma. ( 2014;), ‘ Intimate publics and ephemerality, Snapchat: A case study. ’, Theorizing the Web Conference 2015, New York, USA, 17–18 April.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Willis, Gordon B.. ( 2005), Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu, Bin,, Chang, Pamara,, Welker, Christopher L.,, Bazarova, Natalya, and Cosley, Dan. ( 2016;), ‘ Automatic archiving versus default deletion: What Snapchat tells us about ephemerality in Design. ’, Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, San Francisco, CA, USA, February, pp. 1662–75, https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819948. Accessed 11 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ye, Zhang,, Hashim, Noor Hazarina,, Baghirov, Fakhri, and Murphy, Jamie. ( 2017;), ‘ Gender differences in Instagram hashtag use. ’, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27:4, pp. 386–404.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Krogager, Stinne Gunder Strøm, and Degn, Hans-Peter. ( 2020;), ‘ Snapchat: A space for intimate and boundary-pushing transactions. ’, Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 11:3, pp. 377–392, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc_00031_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00031_1
Loading
Snapchat: A space for intimate and boundary-pushing transactions
Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture 11, 377 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc_00031_1
/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00031_1
/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00031_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): boundary pushing; ephemerality; gender; intimate; negotiations; Snapchat; sociality

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error