Well-making in social design: Opening the potential for makerspaces in social design projects | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Well-Making and Making-Well: Craft, Design and Everyday Creativity for Health and Well-Being
  • ISSN: 2040-2457
  • E-ISSN: 2040-2465

Abstract

This article highlights well-being outcomes reported by participants in three social design projects where making has featured as a community engagement and research tool. The spaces created through the projects are framed as makerspaces, a well-documented model of physical locations designed purposefully to support people making and mending together, often in a community setting. Using reflections from the perspectives of two practitioner researchers on co-designing, making and using these spaces, the article is part of ongoing research on developing ideas about well-being and making. We call these spaces well-maker-spaces. The aim of this article is to expand understanding of how makerspaces as a social design tool benefit participants and communities. Drawing on evidence generated through art-based research of ways that making with others contributes to well-being, we propose that makerspaces in social design projects can proactively support well-being alongside other social and environmental outcomes.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Arts and Humanities Research Council (Award AH/K005243/1)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jaah_00112_1
2023-01-16
2024-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfonso, Maria Regina A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Bridging healing and learning through the expressive arts to transform classrooms into healing spaces. ’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 9:2, pp. 185202.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Chris. ( 2012), Makers: The New Industrial Revolution, New York:: Random House;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong, Leah,, Bailey, Jocelyn,, Julier, Guy, and Kimbell, Lucy. ( 2014;), ‘ Social design futures: HEI research and the AHRC. ’, Report for Arts and Humanities Research Council, London:: Arts and Humanities Research Council;, https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/social-design-futures-hei-research-and-the-ahrc. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BBC ( 2019;), ‘ Getting creative really does boost your mood, survey suggests. ’, BBC, 8 May, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48188508. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burt, Emily L., and Atkinson, Jacqueline. ( 2012;), ‘ The relationship between quilting and wellbeing. ’, Journal of Public Health, 34:1, pp. 5459.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carucci, Kayala, and Toyama, Kentaro. ( 2019;), ‘ Making well-being: Exploring the role of makerspaces in long term care facilities. ’, in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘19), Paper 469, Glasgow, 4–9 May: New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cavalcanti, Gui. ( 2013;), ‘ Is it a hackerspace, makerspace, techshop, or fablab. ’, Make: Magazine, 22 May, https://makezine.com/article/education/the-difference-between-hackerspaces-makerspaces-techshops-and-fablabs/. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chapman, Jonathan, and Gant, Nicholas. (eds) ( 2007), Designers, Visionaries and Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays, London:: Earthscan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Collin, Philippa, and Swist, Teresa. ( 2016;), ‘ From products to publics? The potential of participatory design for research on youth, safety and well-being. ’, Journal of Youth Studies, 19:3, pp. 30518.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Community21 ( 2018;), ‘ Case studies: Re-making-well. ’, Community21, 13 January, https://community21.org/casestudies/14815_re_making_well. Accessed 19 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Corkhill, Betson,, Hemmings, Jessica,, Maddock, Angela, and Riley, Jill. ( 2014;), ‘ Knitting and well-being. ’, Textile, 12:1, pp. 3457.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cornwall, Andrea. ( 2008), Democratising Engagement: What the UK Can Learn from International Experience, London:: Demos;, https://www.demos.co.uk/files/Democratising_Engagement-web.pdf. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Crafts Council ( 2020;), ‘ 4 reasons craft is good for your mental health: How making could change your life. ’, Crafts Council, 15 June, https://www.craftscouncil.org.uk/stories/4-reasons-craft-good-your-mental-health. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Culph, Jennifer S.,, Wilson, Nathan J.,, Cordier, Reinie, and Stancliffe, Roger J.. ( 2015;), ‘ Men’s Sheds and the experience of depression in older Australian men. ’, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62:5, pp. 30615.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies, Ceri,, Gant, Nick,, Hart, Angie,, Millican, Juliet,, Wolff, David,, Prosser, Beth, and Laing, Stuart. ( 2016;), ‘ Exploring engaged spaces in community–university partnership. ’, Metropolitan Universities, 27:3, pp. 626.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport ( 2014;), ‘ The Farrell Review of architecture and the built environment: Our future in place. ’, The Farrell Review, 31 March, http://www.farrellreview.co.uk/download. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport ( 2017;), ‘ Libraries and makerspaces: Information on makerspaces in libraries. ’, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/libraries-and-makerspaces. Accessed 25 August 2022.
  18. Fleetwood-Smith, Rebecka. ( 2021;), ‘ Rethinking creative research methods in response to COVID-19: Creating a remote research kit. ’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 12:3, pp. 27188.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Frayling, Christopher. ( 1994;), ‘ Research in art and design. ’, Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1:1 pp. 25.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuller, R. Buckminster. ( 1969), Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth, New York:: Simon and Schuster;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gant, Nick., ( 2016;), ‘ Virtuous circular economies. ’, Community21, 13 February, https://community21.org/casestudies/18772_virtuous_circular_economies. Accessed 23 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gant, Nick,, Hackney, Fiona, and Hill, Katie. ( 2018;), ‘ The well-maker-space. ’, Making Futures Journal, 5, https://makingfuturesarchive.pca.ac.uk/archive/mfjournal-2017/workshop-sessionsmf17. Accessed 23 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Graham, Helen,, Hill, Katie,, Holland, Tessa, and Pool, Steve. ( 2015;), ‘ When the workshop is working. The role of artists in collaborative research with young people and communities. ’, Qualitative Research Journal, 15:4, pp. 40415.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hackney, Fiona,, Hill, Katie, and Saunders, Clare. ( 2019;), ‘ Jack’s jumper: Designing a sensibility for sustainable clothing communities. ’, in IFFTI Conference, International Foundation of Fashion Technology Institutes, Manchester Fashion Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, 8–12 April, pp. 116, https://fashioninstitute.mmu.ac.uk/assets/uploads/2019/07/1-Jack%E2%80%99s-Jumper-designing-a-sensibility-for-sustainable-clothing-communities-Fiona-Hackney.pdf. Accessed 19 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hackney, Fiona,, Hill, Katie,, Saunders, Clare, and Willett, Joanie. ( 2021;), ‘ Changing the world, not just our wardrobes: A sensibility for sustainable clothing, care, and quiet activism. ’, in E. Paulicelli,, V. Manlow, and E. Wissinger. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Fashion Studies, London:: Routledge;, pp. 11121.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hatch, Mark. ( 2014), The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers, New York:: McGraw-Hill Education;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee ( 2019), Fixing Fashion: Clothing Consumption and Sustainability. Sixteenth Report of Session 2017–19, London:: House of Commons;, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmenvaud/1952/full-report.html. Accessed 19 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ideo.org ( 2015;), ‘ The field guide to human-centered design. ’, Design Kit, https://www.designkit.org/resources/1. Accessed 19 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma, Lama Majaj, and Penner, Crystal M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Tapestries of resilience: An arts-based approach to enhancing the resilience of World Vision’s humanitarian staff. ’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 9:2, pp. 23751.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Madsen, Wendy. ( 2019;), ‘ Re-creating community spaces and practices: Perspectives from artists and funders of creative placemaking. ’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 10:1, pp. 2540.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Manzini, Ezio, and Jegou, Francois. ( 2004), Sustainable Everyday – Scenarios of Urban Life, Milan:: Edizione Ambiente;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McNiff, Shaun. ( 2008;), ‘ 3 art-based research. ’, in J. G. Knowles, and A. L. Cole. (eds), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, London:: SAGE Publications;, pp. 2941.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Men’s Sheds Association ( 2017;), ‘ About men’s sheds. ’, Men’s Sheds, https//:menssheds.org.uk. Accessed 19 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore, Aaron,, Williams, Andrew James, and Bland, Emma. ( 2021;), ‘ The effects on wellbeing of participating in digital fabrication sessions. ’, Fab16, Montreal, 9–15 August, https://www.createeducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/CNC-Craft-Fab16-Wellbeing-Paper.pdf. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Morgan, Michelle,, Hayes, Rick,, Williamson, Michelle, and Ford, Chris. ( 2007;), ‘ Men’s sheds: A community approach to promoting mental health and well-being. ’, International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 9:3, pp. 4852.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Papanek, Victor. ( 1971), Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, New York:: Pantheon Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Parsons, Sarah. ( 2015;), ‘ The potential of digital technologies for transforming informed consent practices with children and young people in social research. ’, Social Inclusion, 3:6, pp. 5668.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. R&A Collaborations ( 2019;), ‘ S4S stitched up! Changing behaviour. ’, YouTube, 26 February, https://youtu.be/JPmm4qi56vU. Accessed 19 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Resnick, Elizabeth. ( 2019), The Social Design Reader, London:: Bloomsbury;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sanders, Elizabeth B. N., and Stappers, Pieter Jan. ( 2008;), ‘ Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. ’, Co-Design, 4:1, pp. 518.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Seo, JooYoung, and Richard, Gabriela T.. ( 2021;), ‘ SCAFFOLDing all abilities into makerspaces: A design framework for universal, accessible and intersectionally inclusive making and learning. ’, Information and Learning Sciences, 122:11&12, pp. 795815.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Smit, Dorothe, and Fuchsberger, Verena. ( 2020;), ‘ Sprinkling diversity: Hurdles on the way to inclusiveness in makerspaces. ’, in Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, vol. 96, Tallinn, Estonia, 25–29 October, New York:: Association of Computer Machinery;, pp. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith, Adrian. ( 2017;), ‘ Social innovation, democracy and makerspaces. ’, SPRU Working Paper Series (SWPS) 2017-10, Sussex:: University of Sussex;, pp. 118, https://www.sussex.ac.uk/business-school/people-and-departments/spru/research/working-papers#archive. Accessed 25 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Steele, Katherine,, Blaser, Brianna, and Cakmak, Maya. ( 2018;), ‘ Accessible making: Designing makerspaces for accessibility. ’, International Journal of Designs for Learning, 9:1, pp. 11421.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Taylor, Nick,, Hurley, Ursula, and Connolly, Philip. ( 2016;), ‘ Making community: The wider role of makerspaces in public life. ’, in CHI ‘16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, 7–12 May, New York:: Association of Computer Machinery;, pp. 141525.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Thackara, John. ( 2005), In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Vyas, Dhaval. ( 2019;), ‘ Altruism and wellbeing as care work in a craft-based maker culture. ’, in C. Lampe,, J. Nichols,, K. Karahalios,, G. Fitzpatrick,, U. Lee, and A. Monroy-Hernandez. (eds), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, GROUP, article no. 239, New York:: Association of Computer Machinery;, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. West, Jodie, and Saunders, Clare. ( 2019;), ‘ Sustainable clothing: Bottom up policy drivers and incentives, S4S policy briefing. ’, Presented at the House of Lords, London, 17 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilson, Nathan J., and Cordier, Reinie. ( 2013;), ‘ A narrative review of Men’s Sheds literature: Reducing social isolation and promoting men’s health and well-being. ’, Health & Social Care in the Community, 21:5, pp. 45163.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Woodward, Sophie. ( 2007), Why Women Wear What They Wear, Oxford and New York:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Gant, Nick, and Hill, Katie. ( 2022;), ‘ Well-making in social design: Opening the potential for makerspaces in social design projects. ’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 13:3, pp. 291306, https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah_00112_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jaah_00112_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jaah_00112_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error