China’s cautious ‘facetuning’: The art of cultural diplomacy and nation branding1 | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

This introduction for the Special Issue establishes and substantiates China as a timely case study for the understanding of cultural diplomacy and nation branding. It traces the country’s mobilization of creative expressions, including contemporary art, to recalibrate its international image in line with its expanding power, but also more often, to offset what it perceives as hostile representations and critique of its authoritarian rule. We first disentangle the overlapping objectives and strategies between cultural diplomacy and national branding, then how they are rendered through artistic expressions to both redeem and – sometimes unintentionally – undermine China’s reputation. Finally, we mark the relationship between the assembled papers which explore a variety of cultural diplomacy and nation branding activities that have emerged out of different artistic traditions, geopolitical contexts and economic motivations. These papers pursue diverse themes, for instance, the misalignment of nationalist branding messages and actual cultural relations on the ground, or the shifting of China’s external image as dictated by the evolving agenda of the Chinese Communist Party. The particularities of these approaches and discoveries, nevertheless, coalesce to underscore that knotted relationship between politics and aesthetics which China must manage and manipulate continually to sway global perception.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • United Kingdom’s Arts and Humanities Research Council (Award AH/T006706/1)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00084_2
2023-12-08
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jcca/10/3/jcca.10.3.255_Chao.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00084_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aronczyk, Melissa (2013), Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Browning, Christopher S. (2023), Nation Branding and International Politics, London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao, Jenifer (2022), ‘The visual politics of Brand China: Exceptional history and speculative future’, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, online first, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00270-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chao, Maggie, Chow, Elaine, Kerbs, Gil and Long, Kate (2012), ‘“Thanks, but no thanks” to Made in China’, Knowledge@Wharton, 3 January, https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/thanks-but-no-thanks-to-made-in-china-2/. Accessed 13 July 2021.
  5. Cull, Nicholas J. (2019), Public Diplomacy: Foundations for Global Engagement in the Digital Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hansen, Lene and Spanner, Johan (2021), ‘National and post-national performances at the Venice Biennale: Site-specific seeing through the photo essay’, Millennium, 49:2, pp. 30536.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Melissen, Jan (2005), ‘The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice’, in J. Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 327.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mordhorst, Mads (2015), ‘Public diplomacy vs nation branding: The case of Denmark after the Cartoon Crisis’, in L. Clerc, N. Glover and P. Jordan (eds), Histories of Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding in the Nordic and Baltic Countries: Representing the Periphery, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill Nijhoff, pp. 23756.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nye, Joseph S. (2004), Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rasmussen, Rasmus Kjærgaard and Merkelsen, Henrik (2014), ‘The risks of nation branding as crisis response: A case study of how the Danish government turned the Cartoon Crisis into a struggle with globalization’, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 10:3, pp. 23048.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saunders, Robert A. (2017), Popular Geopolitics and Nation Branding in the Post-Soviet Realm, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Shephard, Wade (2016), ‘How “Made in China” became cool’, Forbes, 22 May, https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2016/05/22/how-made-in-china-became-cool/. Accessed 13 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Solomon, Ty and Steele, Brent J. (2017), ‘Micro-moves in International Relations theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 23:2, pp. 26791.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tuch, Hans (1990), Communicating with the World: US Public Diplomacy Overseas, New York: St Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Varga, Somogy (2013), ‘The marketization of foreign cultural policy: The cultural nationalism of the competition state’, Constellations, 20:3, pp. 44258.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Volčič, Zala and Andrejevic, Mark (2011), ‘Nation branding in the era of commercial nationalism’, International Journal of Communication, 5:1, pp. 598618.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Waller, Michael J. (2009), ‘Cultural diplomacy, political influence, and integrated strategy’, in M. J. Waller (ed.), Strategic Influence: Public Diplomacy, Counterpropaganda, and Political Warfare, Washington, DC: Institute of World Politics Press, pp. 7483.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Xinhuanet (2021), ‘At the 30th collective study of the Political Bureau of the CCP Central Committee, Xi Jinping stressed the need to strengthen and improve international communication to show a real, three-dimensional and comprehensive China’, 1 June, http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2021-06/01/c_11275%2017461.htm. Accessed 31 July 2023.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00084_2
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error