Hate narratives, conditioned language and networked harassment: A new breed of anti-shipper and anti-fan – antis | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Fandom Studies, The
  4. Volume 10, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 2046-6692
  • E-ISSN: 2046-6706

Abstract

In recent years hostility amongst fans based on what a person ships or tolerates in shipping has become a growing point of contention in western fandom. This has resulted in an ‘anti-shipper’ (or ‘anti’) vs. ‘pro-shipper’ (or ‘pro-ship’), ‘Good versus Evil’ dichotomy that has slowly consumed fandom communities from the inside out. At the core of ‘anti’ debates is a foundation of beliefs rooted in conservatism that what a person consumes in fiction determines their real-life behaviours. Thus, an anti-shipper who is against those viewed to be pro-shippers is already deemed more morally pure. This has culminated in the escalation of toxic vigilantism that has driven harassment, violence-based threats and the criminalization of fellow fans. This piece deconstructs this anti phenomenon and the dominant behaviours that accompany it by evaluating the traditionally conservative environments in which these ideas originated, and by exploring how antis employ hate narratives, conditioned language and morally motivated networked harassment to justify dehumanizing and abusing other fans. This examination ultimately concludes that no kind of communal fandom restoration can begin to occur until those targeted by such anti-shippers are viewed as human beings (not sub-human) and a universal understanding of fiction, reality, psychology and human behaviour based in science is established.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00060_1
2023-05-08
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, Anna,, von Cramon, D. Yves, and Schubotz, Ricarda I.. ( 2008;), ‘ Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: The neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality. ’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20:6, pp. 965–76, https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20059.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aburime, Samantha. ( 2021;), ‘ The cult structure of the American anti. ’, Transformative Works and Cultures, 36, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2021.2147.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Amdt1.3.11 ( n.d.;), ‘ Overview of obscene speech. ’, Constitution Annotated, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt1-2-3-4-1/ALDE_00000747. Accessed 3 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AntiPornography ( 2022), https://www.antipornography.org/home.html. Accessed 6 January 2023.
  5. #antisdie ( 2022), TikTok, https://www.tiktok.com/tag/antisdie. Accessed 20 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Aronson, Elliot,, Wilson, Tim,, Akert, Robin, and Sommers, Sam. ( 2018), Social Psychology, Harlow:: Pearson Education;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Baixueagain ( 2021;), ‘ I will go down with this trash fire. ’, Tumblr, 5 August, https://baixueagain.tumblr.com/post/658705980749725696/idon’tt-but-thanks-for-giving-the-most. Accessed 28 November 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bivona, Jenny, and Critelli, Joseph. ( 2009;), ‘ The nature of women’s rape fantasies: An analysis of prevalence, frequency, and contents. ’, Journal of Sex Research, 46:1, pp. 33–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bloom, Mia, and Moskalenko, Sophia. ( 2021), Pastels and Pedophiles: Inside the Mind of QAnon, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Buckingham, David. ( 2001;), ‘ Electronic child abuse? Rethinking the media’s effects on children. ’, in M. Barker, and J. Petley. (eds), Ill Effects: The Media/Violence Debate, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 63–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bukovska, Barbora. ( 2020;), ‘ INHOPE members reporting artwork as child sexual abuse. ’, Article 19, 21 January, https://www.article19.org/resources/inhope-members-reporting-artwork-as-child-sexual-abuse. Accessed 23 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Citron, Danielle. ( 2016), Hate Crimes in Cyberspace, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Click, Mellisa A.. (ed.) ( 2019;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in Anti-Fandom: Dislike and Hate in the Digital Age, New York:: New York University Press;, pp. 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Doherty, Thomas. ( 1999), Pre-Code Hollywood: Sex, Immorality, and Insurrection in American Cinema, 1930–1934, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fanlore Wiki ( 2022a;), ‘ Anti-anti. ’, 22 April, https://fanlore.org/wiki/Anti-anti. Accessed 23 May 2022.
  16. Fanlore Wiki ( 2022b;), ‘ Anti-shipper. ’, 12 May, https://fanlore.org/wiki/Anti-shipper. Accessed 23 May 2022.
  17. Fujoshi ( 2022;), ‘ Anti-fan archive. ’, https://www.fujoshi.info/antifan-archive. Accessed 20 February 2023.
  18. Gilbert, Anne. ( 2019;), ‘ Hatewatch with me: Anti-fandom as social performance. ’, in M. Click. (ed.), Anti-Fandom: Dislike and Hate in the Digital Age, New York:: New York University Press;, pp. 62–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gilden, Andrew. ( 2016;), ‘ Punishing sexual fantasy. ’, William & Mary Law Review, 58:2, pp. 419–91, https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol58/iss2/3. Accessed 6 January 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Google Forms ( 2017;), ‘ Discourse Demographics Survey. ’, 25 October, https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeNLlB64PD9k0bxG1bw3Crq5DE_VQhY_on_orWtuGIogN9gAQ/viewanalytics. Accessed 9 May 2022.
  21. Granic, Isabela,, Lobel, Adam, and Engels, Rutger. ( 2014;), ‘ The benefits of playing video games. ’, American Psychologist, 69:1, pp. 66–78, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gray, Jonathan. ( 2003;), ‘ New audiences, new textualities: Anti-fans and non-fans. ’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6:1, pp. 64–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877903006001004.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gray, Jonathan. ( 2022a), Dislike-Minded: Media, Audiences, and the Dynamics of Taste, Kindle ed., New York:: New York University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gray, Jonathan. ( 2022b;), personal communication. with S. Aburime, 14 September.
  25. Haynes, Gavin. ( 2020;), ‘ How knitters got knotted in a purity spiral. ’, UnHerd, 30 January, https://unherd.com/2020/01/cast-out-how-knitting-fell-into-a-purity-spiral. Accessed 29 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones, Christopher,, Olson, Michael, and Fazio, Russel. ( 2010;), ‘ Evaluative conditioning: The “how” question. ’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, pp. 205–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. @KiingFluffybuns ( 2020;), ‘ I wanna bring attention to just how badly things with Fandom Police are …. ’, Twitter, 5 May, https://web.archive.org/web/20211006004323/https://twitter.com/KiingFluffybuns/status/1257701735641972737. Accessed 23 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Knack, Natasha,, Winder, Belinda,, Murphy, Lisa, and Fedoroff, J. Paul. ( 2019;), ‘ Primary and secondary prevention of child sexual abuse. ’, International Review of Psychiatry, 31:2, pp. 181–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2018.1541872.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lagrange, Victoria,, Hiskes, Benjamin,, Woodward, Claire,, Li, Binyan, and Breithaupt, Fritz. ( 2019;), ‘ Choosing and enjoying violence in narratives. ’, PLoS One, 14:12, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226503.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lanning, Kenneth V.. ( 2010), Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis, Alexandria, VA:: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children;, https://www.icmec.org/p-content/uploads/2015/10/US-NCMEC-OJJDP-Child-Molesters-A-Behavioral-Analysis-Lanning-2010.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lepore, Stephen, and Kliewer, Wendy. ( 2013;), ‘ Expressive writing and health. ’, in M. D. Gellman, and J. R. Turner. (eds), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine, New York:: Springer;, pp. 735–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Levand, Mark,, Chando, Stephanie,, Wolfe, Mark,, Pillai-Friedma, Sabitha, and Love, Elliot. ( 2019;), ‘ The light in the shadows: Therapeutic explorations of fantasy and fear. ’, Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 34:4, pp. 473–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. LII ( 2022;), ‘ Incest. ’, Cornell Law School, April, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/incest. Accessed 17 February 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Marwick, Alice E.. ( 2021;), ‘ Morally motivated networked harassment as normative reinforcement. ’, Social Media + Society, 7:2, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021378.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Maslej, Marta,, Mar, Raymond, and Kuperman, Victor. ( 2021;), ‘ The textual features of fiction that appeal to readers: Emotion and abstractness. ’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15:2, pp. 272–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mason, Jessica. ( 2020;), ‘ Hannibal’s Bryan Fuller is done with your anti-ship BS. ’, Mary Sue, 13 October, https://www.themarysue.com/bryan-fuller-done-with-anti-ship-bs. Accessed 29 April 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller, Cindy, and Lowen, Cynthia. ( 2012), Essential Guide to Bullying: Prevention and Intervention, New York:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Montell, Amanda. ( 2021), Cultish: The Language of Fanaticism, New York:: HarperCollins;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. NCOSE ( 2018;), ‘ Tumblr took a step against porn, but is it enough?. ’, National Center on Child Exploitation, 13 December, https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/tumblr-porn-ban/. Accessed 24 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. NCOSE ( 2019;), ‘ Pornography: A public health crisis. ’, National Center on Child Exploitation, https://web.archive.org/web/20191103203043/https://endsexualexploitation.org/publichealth/. Accessed 24 January 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ng, Eve. ( 2022), Cancel Culture: A Critical Analysis, Kindle. ed., Cham:: Springer International;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Nyberg, Amy. ( 1998), Seal of Approval: The History of the Comics Code, Jackson, MS:: University Press of Mississippi;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Paasonen, Susanna,, Attwood, Feona,, McKee, Alan,, Mercer, John, and Smith, Clarissa. ( 2020), Objectification: On the Difference between Sex and Sexism, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Patchin, Justin. ( 2019;), ‘ 2019 cyberbullying data. ’, Cyberbullying Research Center, 9 July, https://cyberbullying.org/2019-cyberbullying-data. Accessed 29 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. @PgamingReal ( 2022;), ‘ Read and weep, lolicons. Your days here are numbered. ’, Twitter, 2 May, https://twitter.com/PGamingReal/status/1521185638271406086. Accessed 15 May 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. #proshippersdie ( 2022), TikTok, https://www.tiktok.com/tag/proshippersdie. Accessed 9 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Reisman, Judith. ( 2016;), ‘ The origins of the transgender phenomenon: The challenge and opportunity for training lawyers, judges and policy makers in the historicity of Alfred Kinsey’s pansexual worldview. ’, Faculty Publications and Presentations, 74, pp. 1–59, https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lusol_fac_pubs/74/. Accessed 4 June 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Riehm, Kira,, Feder, Kenneth,, Tormohlen, Kayla,, Crum, Rosa,, Young, Andrea,, Green, Kerry,, Pacek, Lauren,, La Flair, Lareina, and Mojtabai, Ramin. ( 2019;), ‘ Associations between time spent using social media and internalizing and externalizing problems among US youth. ’, JAMA Psychiatry, 76:12, pp. 1266–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Rubin, Gayle S.. ( 2007;), ‘ Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. ’, in R. Parker, and P. Aggleton. (eds), Culture Society and Sexuality: A Reader, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 143–78, https://web.archive.org/web/20121224204605/http://www.feminish.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Rubin1984.pdf. Accessed 26 December 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Schevers, Ky. ( 2021;), ‘ Confessions of a former “crypto-TERF”. ’, Medium, 17 January, https://kyschevers.medium.com/confessions-of-a-former-crypto-terf-e4ed59d4ec82. Accessed 4 October 2021.
  51. Sloan, Denise,, Marx, Brian,, Epstein, Eva, and Dobbs, Jennifer. ( 2008;), ‘ Expressive writing buffers against maladaptive rumination. ’, Emotion, 8:2, pp. 302–06, https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.302.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Smyth, Joshua,, Hockemeyer, Jill, and Tulloch, Heather. ( 2008;), ‘ Expressive writing and post-traumatic stress disorder: Effects on trauma symptoms, mood states, and cortisol reactivity. ’, British Journal of Health Psychology, 13:1, pp. 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1348/135910707X250866.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Southern Poverty Law Center ( 2021;), ‘ Truth or fiction: Teaching digital literacy to children is vital to combating online disinformation. ’, 1 October, https://www.splcenter.org/news/2021/10/01/truth-or-fiction-teaching-digital-literacy-children-vital-combating-online-disinformation. Accessed 20 September 2022.
  54. Sternberg, Robert, and Sternberg, Karin. ( 2008), The Nature of Hate, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. The Trevor Project ( 2021;), ‘ National survey on LGBTQ youth mental health 2021. ’, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2021/. Accessed 23 September 2021.
  56. US Department of Justice ( 2020;), ‘ Citizen’s guide to US federal law on child pornography. ’, 28 May, https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography. Accessed 26 December 2022.
  57. van Monsjou, Elizabeth, and Mar, Raymond. ( 2019;), ‘ Interest and investment in fictional romances. ’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13:4, pp. 431–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Zoloft-Paxil ( 2020;), ‘ Yes, I did in fact sexually assault my ex-friend who outed me to my parents …. ’, Tumblr, 6 July, https://web.archive.org/web/20200728074247/https://zoloft-paxil.tumblr.com/post/622940897407008768/dykeanti-familymangler-yes-i-did-in-fact. Accessed 13 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Aburime, Samantha. ( 2022;), ‘ Hate narratives, conditioned language and networked harassment: A new breed of anti-shipper and anti-fan – antis. ’, Journal of Fandom Studies, 10:2&3, pp. 135–55, https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs_00060_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jfs_00060_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): censorship; cyberbullying; ethics; morality; pro-shipper; psychology; shipping

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error