Legal recognition of same-sex 
partnership as a political claim: Just aporias, critical (im)possibilities | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2052-3971
  • E-ISSN: 2052-398X

Abstract

Legal recognition constitutes one of the most topical questions for LGBTQI+ movements and the relative theory. Legal recognition of same-sex partners is construed, for a part of the movement, as a subversive, emancipatory political claim which seeks to ensure a safe legal ground, where the partners will enjoy visibility and rights comparable to those provided to opposite-sex married couples. However, the historicization of partnership recognition, and more specifically of the institution of marriage, reveals its links to ownership, reproduction of the nation, church, gender discrimination, exclusion as well as to the classification of erotic practices, intimacy and relationality. Addressing the Greek context, this article explores the aporetic tensions between the political demand of recognition and its radical potential, on the one hand, and the context (historical, political and social) of the institution of marriage on the other. Is there any justice in inclusion and how should we understand it? Are all the stories of recognition, hence of inclusion and subjection to law, the same? What does law sustain when its idiom expands, for instance in the case of the new Greek civil partnership agreement? Where is the place – if any – of justice and can it be inhabited by law? Is law something that we ‘cannot not want’, as Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak puts it? Finally, does the position from which these questions are posed matter? The article does not attempt to respond to the dilemmatic question ‘for or against’ legal recognition, but complicates it with analytical tools borrowed from critical theory, feminist and queer theory and Derridean deconstruction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jgmc.4.2.187_1
2018-10-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agamben, G.. ( 2011;), ‘ The archaeology of commandment. ’, 31 January 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVV94Fi5ChI. Accessed 10 November 2017.
  2. Ammaturo, F. R.. ( 2014;), ‘ The right to a privilege? Homonormativity and the recognition of same-sex couples in Europe. ’, Social & Legal Studies, 23:2, pp. 17594.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Apostolelli, A.. ( 2012;), ‘Anaparastasimes oratotites kai i politiki tis ntoulapas’ (‘Representable visibilities and the politics of the closet’). , in A. Apostolelli, and A. Halkias. (eds), Soma, fylo, sexoualikotita: LOATK politikes stin Ellada (‘Body, gender, sexuality: LGBTQ politics in Greece’), Athens:: Plethron;, pp. 197214.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Athanasiou, A.. ( 2007), Zoi sto orio. Dokimia gia to soma, to fylo kai ti viopolitiki (‘Life at the limit: essays on gender, body and biopolitics’), Athens:: Ekkremes;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Avdela, E.. ( 2009;), ‘I opsimi anakalypsi tis episfalous ergasias’ (‘The late discovery of precarious work’). , in A. Athanasiou. (ed.), Episafalis ergasia, ‘gynaikeia ergasia’ (‘Precarious work, “female work”’), Athens:: Nefeli;, pp. 1317.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker, N.. ( 2013), Not the Marrying Kind: A Feminist Critique of Same-Sex Marriage, Hampshire:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beauvoir, S. de. ( 2011), The Second Sex, New York:: Vintage Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, J.. ( 1997), The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler, J.. ( 2000), Antigone’s Claim: Kinship Between Life & Death, New York and Chichester, West Sussex:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, J.. ( 2002a), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, , 10th anniversary ed.., Oxfordshire:: Taylor & Francis;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, J.. ( 2002b;), ‘ Is kinship always already heterosexual?. ’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13:1, pp. 1444.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Butler, J.. ( 2011), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, Oxfordshire:: Taylor & Francis;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler, J., and Athanasiou, A.. ( 2013), Dispossession: The Performative in the Political, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Croce, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Governing through normality: Law and the force of sameness. ’, International Journal of Politics, 24:4, pp. 30323.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Derrida, J.. ( 1992a;), ‘ Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority”. ’, in D. Cornell,, M. Rosenfeld, and D. G. Carlson. (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, New York and London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Derrida, J.. ( 1992b), Acts of Literature, New York and London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Duggan, L.. ( 2003), The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy, Boston, MA:: Beacon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Federici, S.. ( 2004), Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation, New York:: Autonomedia;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Foucault, M.. ( 1978), The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction (trans. ed. Robert Hurley) , New York:: Pantheon Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Foucault, M.. ( 1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York:: Pantheon Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldman, E.. ( 1911), Anarchism and Other Essays, New York and London:: Mother Earth Publishing Association;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Halkia, A.. ( 2007), To adeio likno tis dimokratias: sex, ektrosi kai ethnikismos sti syghroni Ellada (‘The empty cradle of democracy: Sex, abortion and nationalism in modern Greece’), Athens:: Alexandria;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hantzaroula, P.. ( 2009;), ‘Mia genealogia tou apokleismou tis emmisthis oikiakis ergasias apo tin katigoria tis ergasias’ (‘A genealogy of the exclusion of waged housework from the category of work’). , in A. Athanasiou. (ed.), Episafalis ergasia, ‘gynaikeia ergasia’ (‘Precarious work, “female work”’), Athens:: Nefeli;, pp. 1930.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haraway, D.. ( 1988;), ‘ Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. ’, Feminist Studies, 14:3, pp. 57599.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hellenic Statistical Authority ( 2015), Ellas me arithmous (‘Greece in figures’), Piraeus:: Statistical Information and Publications Division;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hull, K. E.. ( 2006), Same-Sex Marriage: The Cultural Politics of Love and Law, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kantsa, V.. ( 2012;), ‘ Orata aorates/aorata orates: Dyo opseis tis lesviakis parousias stin Ellada. (‘Visibly invisible/invisibly visible: Two aspects of the lesbian presence in Greece’). , in A. Apostolelli, and A. Halkias. (eds), Soma, fylo, sexoualikotita: LOATK politikes stin Ellada (‘Body, gender, sexuality: LGBTQ politics in Greece’), Athens:: Plethron;, pp. 2952.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kantsa, V.. ( 2014;), ‘ The price of marriage: Same-sex sexualities and citizenship in Greece. ’, Sexualities, 17:7, pp. 81836.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Katsagiannis, T.. ( 2010), Zitimata dikaiodosias tou ypourgeiou dikaiosynis, diafaneias kai anthropinon dikaiomaton gia tin nomothetiki, dikastiki kai koinoniki prostasia kai isotita ton lesvion, ton gay kai ton amfisexoualikon (‘Issues of jurisdiction of the ministry of justice, transparency and human rights over the legal, juridical protection and equality of lesbians, gays and bisexuals’), Athens:: OLKE;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirtsoglou, E.. ( 2004), For the Love of Women: Gender, Identity and Same-Sex Relationships in a Greek Provincial Town, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Massqueerraid ( 2015;), ‘Thes na min pantreftoume, darling?’ (‘Do you want us not to marry, darling?’). , 23 June 2015, https://massqueerraid.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/θες-να-μην-παντρευτούμε-ντάρλινγκ/. Accessed 10 November 2017.
  32. Muncie, J.,, Wetherell, M.,, Dallos, R.,, Langan, M., and Cochrane, A.. ( 2009), Oikogeneia: I meleti kai katanoisi tis oikogeneiakis zois (‘Family: The study and understanding of family life’), Athens:: Metaichmio;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveira, J. M. De,, Costa, C. G., and Nogueira, C.. ( 2013;), ‘ The workings of homonormativity: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer discourses on discrimination and public displays of affections in Portugal. ’, Journal of Homosexuality, 60:10, pp. 147593.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Papadogiannis, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ One bill fits all? Notes on the new LGBTQ/same-sex legislation in contemporary Greece. ’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, occasional paper 15, November, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Papadopoulou, L.. ( 2008;), ‘Gamos omofylon; Mia apopeira nomikis kai dikaiopolitikis axiologisis’ (‘Same-sex marriage? An attempt of legal and juridico-political evaluation’). , Dikaiomata tou anthropou (‘Human rights’), 38, pp. 40589.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Papadopoulou, L..( 2015;), ‘ I nomiki ennoia tis oikogeneias kai ta omofyla zeugaria: Mathimata apo tin EDDA’ (‘The legal concept of family and same-sex couples: Lessons from ECHR’). , in L. Papadopoulou. (ed.), Tomos pros timin tis omotimis kathigitrias Efis Kounougeri-Manoledaki (‘Studies in honour of Efi Kounougeri-Manoledaki’), Athens and Thessaloniki:: Sakkoulas;, pp. 35589.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Papanagiotou, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ To gramma tou nomou os keimeno kai i ermineia tou sto plaisio tou ellinikou Astikou Kodika. Syghrona simeiotika shimata kai i synepeia tous stin ermineia ton diataxeon tou Astikou Kodika. (‘The letter of law as a text and its interpretation in the context of the Greek Civil Code. Contemporary semiotic configurations and their consistency in the interpretation of the provision of the Civil Code’), Ph.D. thesis, Komotini:: Deomocritus University of Thrace, School of Law;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Papanikolaou, D.. ( 2018), Kati trehei me tin oikogeneia: Ethnos, pothos kai syggeneia tin epohi tis krisis (‘There is something about the family: Nation, desire and kinship at a time of crisis’), Athens:: Patakis;.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rethimiotaki, E.. ( 2015;), ‘Sintrofikotita, gamos kai siggeneia choris emfyli diafora: Mia proklisi gia to oikogeneiako dikaio’ (‘Partnership, marriage and kinship withouth sexual difference: A challenge for family law’). , in Tomos pros timin tis omotimis kathigitrias Efis Kounougeri-Manoledaki (‘Studies in honour of Efi Kounougeri-Manoledaki’), Athens and Thessaloniki:: Sakkoulas;, pp. 787815.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. QV ( 2006), Qvzine #2, https://www.qvzine.net/deytero%20teyxos/intro.html. Accessed 13 April 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. QV ( 2007;), ‘ Festival yperifaneias ATHENS PRIDE. ’ (‘Pride festival ATHENS PRIDE’), https://www.qvzine.net/exostrefia/pride07/pride07.html. Accessed 13 April 2018.
  42. Richardson, D.. ( 2005;), ‘ Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalisation. ’, Antipode, 37:3, pp. 51535.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Santos, A. C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Are we there yet? Queer sexual encounters, legal recognition and homonormativity. ’, Journal of Gender Studies, 22:1, pp. 5464.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Spivak, G. C.. ( 1996;), ‘ Bonding in difference, interview with Alfred Arteaga (1993-94). ’, in D. Landry, and G. MacLean. (eds), The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, New York and London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Stryker, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Transgender history, homonormativity, and disciplinarity. ’, Radical History Review, 100, pp. 14557.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Warner, M.. ( 2000), The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life, Cambridge, MA, Great Britain:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Winnubst, S.. ( 2006), Queering Freedom, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Yiannakopoulos, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Politismikes ennoilogiseis tis monaxias: Syggeneia, koinotita kai politikes tou LOAT kinimatos. ’ (‘Cultural conceptualisations of loneliness: Kinship, community and politics of the LGBT movement’), in A. Apostolelli, and A. Halkias. (eds), Soma, fylo, sexoualikotita: LOATK politikes stin Ellada (‘Body, gender, sexuality: LGBTQ politics in Greece’), Athens:: Plethron;, pp. 173196.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Zartaloudis, T.. ( 2010), Giorgio Agamben: Power, Law and the Uses of Criticism, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Papanagiotou, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Legal recognition of same-sex partnership as a political claim: Just aporias, critical (im)possibilities. ’, Journal of Greek Media & Culture, 4:2, pp. 187203, doi: 10.1386/jgmc.4.2.187_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jgmc.4.2.187_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error