Towards a post-anthropocentric aesthetics: Kerry Tribe’s Exquisite Corpse | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Urban Cultural Studies
  4. Volume 9, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2050-9790
  • E-ISSN: 2050-9804

Abstract

Kerry Tribe’s recent film on the Los Angeles River, (2016), blurs the lines between genres. With aspects of documentary and experimental filmmaking, it captures interactions among human and non-human life, ecological systems and machines along the river. This article develops a post-anthropocentric aesthetics from the film by drawing on Sianne Ngai’s book, (2012), and Rosi Braidotti’s (2013) work on post-anthropocentrism. Bringing these resources together leads to three productive transformations of Ngai’s categories: the commodity aesthetic of cuteness becomes the differential aesthetic of interaction; the performative aesthetic of zaniness becomes the functional aesthetic of activity; and the discursive aesthetic of information becomes the peri-discursive aesthetic of sensation. The article concludes by arguing that these three aesthetic categories are well suited for describing how the contemporary built environment and the complexity of life within it might be perceived and assessed and, following Jacques Rancière, affirms these categories’ role in building a politics that is attuned to such complexities.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00051_1
2022-06-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berman, Marshall. ( 1988), All That Is Solid Melts into Air, New York:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Birke, Lynda,, Bryid, Mette, and Lykke, Nina. ( 2004;), ‘ Animal performances: An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human/animal relationships. ’, Feminist Theory, 5:2, pp. 167–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Braidotti, Rosi. ( 2013), The Posthuman, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke, Edmund. ( 1757;), ‘ A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. ’, https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/b/burke/edmund/sublime/complete.html#part1.7. Accessed 15 July 2019.
  5. Cavell, Stanley. ( 2005), Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. City of Los Angeles Department of Cultural Affairs ( 2016), Current LA Water: Public Art Triennial, Executive Summary, Evaluation Final Report, Los Angeles, CA:: City of Los Angeles Department of Cultural Affairs;, https://culturela.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/CURRENTLA-Water-Evaluation-Executive-Summary.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Deleuze, Gilles. ( 2003), Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation (trans. D. Smith), London:: Continuum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. ( 1994), What Is Philosophy? (trans. H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell), New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris, Keith. ( 2020;), ‘ Blue Seattle: Immanent ethics and contemporary urbanization. ’, Area, 52:2, pp. 273–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Harvey, David. ( 1973), Social Justice and the City, Athens, GA:: University of Georgia Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaiser, Birgit. ( 2011;), ‘ On aesthetics, aisthetics and sensation – reading Baumgarten with Leibniz and Deleuze. ’, Gepubliceerd op Esthetica, 17 October, http://estheticatijdschrift.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/175/2014/09/1-Esthetica-Onaestheticsaistheticsandsensation---readingBaumgartenwithLeibnizwithDeleuze-2011-10-17.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kant, Immanuel. ( 1987), Critique of Judgment (trans. W. Pluhar), Indianapolis, IN:: Hackett;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kant, Immanuel. ( 1993), Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (trans. J. Ellington), Indianapolis, IN:: Hackett;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Larkin, Brian. ( 2013;), ‘ The politics and poetics of infrastructure. ’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, pp. 327–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lazzarato, Maurizio. ( 1996;), ‘ Immaterial labor. ’ (trans. P. Colilli and E. Emery), in M. Hardt, and P. Virno. (eds), Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;, pp. 133–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Marx, Karl. ( 1976), Capital (trans. B. Fowkes), London:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Marx, Karl. ( 1978;), ‘ Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. ’, in R. Tucker. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader, New York:: W. W. Norton;, pp. 66–125.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Mattern, Shannon. ( 2018;), ‘ Maintenance and care. ’, Places, https://placesjournal.org/article/maintenance-and-care/. Accessed 12 June 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ngai, Sianne. ( 2012), Our Aesthetic Categories, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2004), The Politics of Aesthetics (trans. G. Rockhill), London:: Continuum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2010), Dissensus (trans. S. Corcoran), London:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2013), Aisthesis (trans. Z. Paul), New York:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Ruscha, Edward. ( 1963), Twentysix Gasoline Stations, Los Angeles, CA:: National Excelsior Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ruscha, Edward. ( 1965), Some Los Angeles Apartments, Los Angeles, CA:: Edward Ruscha;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruscha, Edward. ( 1966), Every Building on the Sunset Strip, Los Angeles, CA:: Edward Ruscha;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ruscha, Edward. ( 1967), Thirtyfour Parking Lots in Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA:: Edward Ruscha;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sibley, Frank. ( 2001;), ‘ Aesthetic concepts. ’, in J. Benson. (ed.), Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics, New York:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 2–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Tribe, Kerry. ( 2019;), personal correspondence with K. Harris. , 26 September.
  29. Vihalem, Margus. ( 2018;), ‘ Everyday aesthetics and Jacques Rancière: Reconfiguring the common field of aesthetics and politics. ’, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 10:1, pp. 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Wakefield, Stephanie. ( 2017;), ‘ Inhabiting the Anthropocene back loop. ’, Resilience, 6:2, pp. 77–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Zepke, Stephen. ( 2005), Art as Abstract Machine: Ontology and Aesthetics in Deleuze and Guattari, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Harris, Keith. ( 2022;), ‘ Towards a post-anthropocentric aesthetics: Kerry Tribe’s Exquisite Corpse. ’, Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 9:1, pp. 111–29, https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00051_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00051_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): aesthetics; critical urban theory; film; infrastructure; Los Angeles River; post-anthropocentrism

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error