Negotiating the feminist group: Lizzie Borden’s Regrouping (1976) | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2045-6298
  • E-ISSN: 2045-6301

Abstract

This article considers , a ‘failed’ film by Lizzie Borden, to think about the dynamics of feminist group-work in the Women’s Liberation Movement. I argue that the film, both in its subject and in the film project, explores conflict in sisterhood through its experimental collaborative approach as well as in its filmic qualities. Using literature surrounding feminist organizational practices, I explore group behaviours present in the film project through the tensions between Borden’s portrait of feminist collective practice and the group’s representation and agency within the process. I also consider the need to reinstate , largely unknown and withdrawn from circulation, as an important feminist document that works through the complex negotiations of feminist collaboration that took place in the 1970s.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00095_1
2023-04-21
2024-05-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, Pamela. ( 1970), Free Space: A Perspective on the Small Group in Women’s Liberation, New York:: Times Change Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Borden, Lizzie. ( 1977;), ‘ Women and anarchy. ’, Heresies, 1:2, pp. 7177.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borden, Lizzie. ( 2017a), interview with L. Evans-Hill, Los Angeles, CA:, 5 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Borden, Lizzie. ( 2017b), interview with L. Evans-Hill, Los Angeles, CA:, 6 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borden, Lizzie. (ed.) ( 2022), Whorephobia: Strippers on Art, Work, and Life, London:: Seven Stories Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Freeman, Jo. ( 1972;), ‘ The tyranny of structurelessness. ’, The Second Wave, 2:1, pp. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Freeman, Jo. ( 1975;), ‘ Political organization in the feminist movement. ’, Acta Sociologica, 18:2&3, pp. 22444.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Freeman, Jo. ( 1976;), ‘ Trashing: The dark side of sisterhood. ’, Ms. Magazine, April, pp. 4951, 92–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanish, Carol. ( 1970;), ‘ The personal is political. ’, in S. Firestone, and A. Koedt. (eds), Notes from the Second Year: Major Writings of the Radical Feminists, New York:: Radical Feminism;, pp. 7576.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell, Juliet. ( [1971] 2015), Women’s Estate, London:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Moravec, Michelle. ( 2012;), ‘ Toward a history of feminism, art, and social movements in the United States. ’, Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 33:2, pp. 2254.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rich, B. Ruby. ( 1998), Chick Flicks: Theories and Memories of the Feminist Film Movement, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sarachild, Kathie. ( 1970;), ‘ A programme for feminist consciousness raising. ’, in S. Firestone, and A. Koedt. (eds), Notes from the Second Year: Major Writings of the Radical Feminists, New York:: Radical Feminism;, pp. 7880.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sarachild, Kathie. ( 1975;), ‘ Consciousness raising: A radical weapon. ’, Redstockings: Feminist Revolution, New Platz, NY:: Redstockings;, pp. 13137.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yates, Gayle Graham. ( 1975), What Women Want: The Ideas of the Movement, Cambridge, MA and London:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00095_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/miraj_00095_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): collaboration; documentary; experimental; feminism; film; women
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error