Afterimages and the synaesthesia of photography | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Philosophy of Photography
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

This article takes as its focus the concept of the ‘afterimage’ and its relationship to memory, the synaesthetic experience of perception and the multisensory turn within the study of photographic images. Afterimages have consistently been described as phenomena of visual persistence where, optically, a recorded moment of the past leaks into the present and remains visible before us on our retinas. By recasting this originary understanding of an afterimage as simply a ghostly, optical occurrence and insisting that the phenomenon exceeds the visual and is rather an intersensorial occurrence, I seek to present how encounters with images stay with us in powerful ways and across many senses at once. As an intervention within the field of image theory and photography studies that builds upon the relatively recent turn away from prioritizing visuality and instead shifting towards multisensoriality – what we might also term as the ‘more-than visual’ – this piece proposes that if images exceed the visual and carry with them physical, haptic, sonic and affective qualities, then perhaps the afterimage is not something that we merely but also what we can and and . Perhaps the afterimage carries an intensity and an afterlife which lingers in our minds and can take hold of our entire body and our senses, composing and recomposing them over time. By pairing such inquiries alongside the narrative, literary and poetic works of Dionne Brand and Nathaniel Mackey – both of whom write of the intersensorial quality of photographs and afterimages with a particular kind of lively openness – I am hoping to intervene into the ongoing ‘more-than visual’ turn within the field of image theory by infusing it with a narrative-oriented synaesthetic vocabulary.

© 2022 (2021) Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00050_1
2023-01-24
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Azoulay, Ariella. ( 2012), Civil Imagination: A Political Ontology of Photography, London:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bal, Mieke. ( 2003;), ‘ Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture. ’, Journal of Visual Culture, 2:1, pp. 5–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barthes, Roland. ( 1981), Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photographs, London:: Vintage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Batchen, Geoffrey. ( 2001), Each Wild Idea: Writing, Photography, History, Cambridge:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Batchen, Geoffrey. ( 2004), Forget Me Not: Photography and Remembrance, New York:: Princeton Architectural Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brand, Dionne. ( 1988;), ‘ Photograph. ’, in D. Brand. (ed.), Sans Souci and Other Stories, Stratford, CA:: Williams-Wallace;, pp. 53–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Elspeth H., and Phu, Thy. (eds) ( 2014;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in E. H. Brown, and T. Phu. (eds), Feeling Photography, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;, pp. 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Campt, Tina M.. ( 2012), Image Matters: Archive, Photography, and the African Diaspora in Europe, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Campt, Tina M.. ( 2017), Listening to Images, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Campt, Tina M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Black visuality and the practice of refusal. ’, Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 29:1, pp. 79–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chaudhary, Zahid. ( 2012), Afterimage of Empire: Photography in Nineteenth-Century India, Minnesota, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Currie-Williams, Kelann. ( 2021;), ‘ Life after demolition: The absented presence of Montreal’s negro community centre. ’, Urban History Review, 48:2, pp. 56–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Doane, Mary Ann. ( 2002), The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Doane, Mary Ann. ( 2007;), ‘ Indexicality: Trace and sign: Introduction. ’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 18:1, pp. 1–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Edwards, Elizabeth. ( 2012;), ‘ Objects of affect: Photography beyond the image. ’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, pp. 221–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fretwell, Erica. ( 2020), Sensory Experiments: Pychophysics, Race, and the Aesthetics of Feeling, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Goysdotter, Moa. ( 2013), Impure Vision: American Staged Photography of the 1970s, Lund:: Nordic Academic Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Langford, Martha. ( 2001), Suspended Conversations: The Afterlife of Memory in Photographic Albums, Montreal:: McGill-Queen’s University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Luciano, Dana. ( 2016;), ‘ Touching seeing. ’, American Literary History, 28:1, pp. 140–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mackey, Nathaniel. ( 2008), Bass Cathedral, New York:: New Directions;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Mackey, Nathaniel. ( 2010), From a Broken Bottle Traces of Perfume Still Emanate, New York:: New Directions;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Manning, Erin. ( 2007), Politics of Touch: Sense, Movement, Sovereignty, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Manning, Erin. ( 2012), Always More Than One: Individuation’s Dance, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Massumi, Brian. ( 2002), Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. McCallum, E. L.. ( 2007;), ‘ Toward a photography of love: The tain of the photograph in Anne Carson’s Autobiography of Red. ’, Postmodern Culture, 17:3, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchell, W. J. T.. ( 2005;), ‘ There are no visual media. ’, Journal of Visual Culture, 4:2, pp. 257–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Moten, Fred. ( 2003), In the Break: The Aesthetics of Black Radical Tradition, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Moten, Fred, and Tsang, Wu. ( 2016), Who Touched Me?, Amsterdam: If I Can’t Dance, I Don’t Want To Be Part of Your Revolution , https://monoskop.org/images/b/ba/Moten_Fred_Tang_Wu_Who_Touched_Me_2016.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Oboussier, Claire. ( 1995;), ‘ Synaesthesia in Cixous and Barthes. ’ in D. Knight, and J. Still. (eds), Women and Representation, Nottingham:: WIF Publications;, pp. 115–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Olin, Margaret. ( 2012), Touching Photographs, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pink, Sarah. ( 2011;), ‘ Sensory digital photography: Re-thinking “moving” and the image. ’, Visual Studies, 26:1, pp. 4–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ryan, Kathleen M.. ( 2011;), ‘ From propaganda to the personal: WAVES, memory, and the “prick” of photography. ’, in A. Freund, and A. Thiessen. (eds), Oral History and Photography, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 133–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Seremetakis, Nadia C.. ( 1994), The Senses Still: Perception and Memory as Material Culture in Modernity, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith, Shawn Michelle. ( 2013), At the Edge of Sight: Photography and the Unseen, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, Shawn Michelle. ( 2014;), ‘ Photography between desire and grief: Roland Barthes and F. Holland Day. ’, in E. H. Brown, and T. Phu. (eds), Feeling Photography, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;, pp. 29–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson, Krista. ( 2015), Shine: The Visual Economy of Light in African Diasporic Aesthetic Practice, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Walker, Ian. ( 2005;), ‘ Through the picture plane: On looking into photographs. ’, in M. Langford. (ed.), Image & Imagination, Montreal:: McGill-Queen’s University Press;, pp. 17–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wright, Christopher. ( 2013), The Echo of Things: The Lives of Photographs in the Solomon Islands, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Currie-Williams, Kelann. ( 2022 [2021];), ‘ Afterimages and the synaesthesia of photography. ’, Philosophy of Photography, 12:1&2, pp. 111–27, https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00050_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00050_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): affect; afterimage; intersensorial; more than visual; multisensory; photographic images

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error