Corrupting data and sensing error, or how to ‘see’ digital images

References

1. Arcangel, Cory (2007), Panasonic TH-42PWD8UK Plasma Screen Burn. Private Collection.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arthurs, Jane, Drakopoulou, Sophia and Gandini, Alessandro (2018), ‘Researching YouTube’, Convergence, 24:1, pp. 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517737222.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Azar, Mitra, Cox, Geoff and Impett, Leonardo (2021), ‘Introduction: Ways of machine seeing’, AI & Society, 36, pp. 1093–104, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01124-6.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Benjamin, Ruha (2019), Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, Medford, MA: Polity.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berlant, Lauren (2016), ‘The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34:3, pp. 393–419, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816645989.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berlant, Lauren (2022), On the Inconvenience of Other People, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Burgess, Jean and Green, Joshua (2018), YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cascone, Kim (2000), ‘The aesthetics of failure: “Post-digital” tendencies in contemporary computer music’, Computer Music Journal, 24:4, pp. 12–18, https://doi.org/10.1162/014892600559489.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Corrupting Data Featuring Spam Power (2017), Falmouth Art Gallery, Falmouth, UK, 23 September–4 November.
10. Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2007), Objectivity, New York and Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Davidson, James, Liebald, Benjamin, Liu, Junning, Nandy, Palash, Van Vleet, Taylor, Gargi, Ullas, Gupta, Sujoy, He, Yu, Lambert, Mike, Livingston, Blake and Sampath, Dasarati (2010), ‘The YouTube video recommendation system’, in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys ’10, Barcelona, Spain, 26–30 September, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 293–96, https://doi.org/10.1145/1864708.1864770.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Debord, Guy (1956), ‘Theory of the dérive’, Les Lèvres Nues, 9: November, https://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/theory.html. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dewdney, Andrew (2021), Forget Photography, Cambridge: Goldsmiths.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dewdney, Andrew and Sluis, Katrina (eds) (2022), The Networked Image in Post-Digital Culture, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Duffy, Brooke Erin and Meisner, Colten (2023), ‘Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility’, Media, Culture & Society, 45:2, pp. 285–304, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221111923.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Farocki, Harun (2004), ‘Phantom images’, Public, 29, pp. 12–22.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gaboury, Jacob (2021), Image Objects: An Archaeology of Computer Graphics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gabrys, Jennifer (2016), Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goriunova, Olga and Shulgin, Alexei (2008), ‘Glitch’, in M. Fuller (ed.), Software Studies: A Lexicon, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 110–18.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hains, Sam (2017), official website, http://samhains.com. Accessed 11 November 2022.
21. Hoel, A. S. Aurora (2020), ‘Images as active powers for reality: A Simondonian approach to medical imaging’, in E. Alloa and C. Cappelletto (eds), Dynamis of the Image: Moving Images in a Global World, Contact Zones, Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp. 287–310, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110530544-014.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hoelzl, Ingrid and Marie, Rémi (2015), Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image, Bristol: Intellect Books.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hoelzl, Ingrid and Marie, Rémi (2022), Common Image: Towards a Larger than Human Communism, Bielefeld: Transcript.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jones, Nathan (2022), Glitch Poetics, London: Open Humanities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. MacDonald, Thomas (2021), ‘“How it actually works”: Algorithmic lore videos as market devices’, New Media & Society, 25:6, pp. 1412–31, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211021404.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Manon, Hugh S. and Temkin, Daniel (2011), ‘Notes on glitch’, World Picture Journal 6: Wrong, http://worldpicturejournal.com/article/notes-on-glitch/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Menkman, Rosa (2011), The Glitch Moment(um), Network Notebook, Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Nam June Paik (1965), Magnet TV, Sculpture, New York: Whitney Museum of American Art.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Noble, Safiya (2018), Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Parikka, Jussi (2023), Operational Images: From the Visual to the Invisual, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Penny, Daniel (2017), ‘The Instagrammable charm of the bourgeoisie’, Boston Review, 17 November, https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/daniel-penny-insta/. Accessed 26 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pinchevski, Amit (2023), ‘Social media’s canaries: Content moderators between digital labor and mediated trauma’, Media, Culture & Society, 45:1, pp. 212–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221122226.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Randall, Packer and Cates, John (2014), ‘Glitch expectations: A conversation with Jon Cates’, Hyperallergic, 25 June, https://hyperallergic.com/134709/glitch-expectations-a-conversation-with-jon-cates/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rieder, Bernhard, Matamoros-Fernández, Ariadna and Coromina, Òscar (2018), ‘From ranking algorithms to “ranking cultures”: Investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results’, Convergence, 24:1, pp. 50–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736982.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rubinstein, Daniel and Sluis, Katrina (2008), ‘A life more photographic’, photographies, 1:1, pp. 9–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760701785842.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Russell, Legacy (2020), Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Salvaggio, Eryk (2023), ‘How to read an AI image: Toward a media studies methodology for the analysis of synthetic images’, IMAGE, 37:1, pp. 83–99, https://doi.org/10.1453/1614-0885-1-2023-15456.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Steinmetz, Katy (2018), ‘“Instagram” is officially a verb, according to Merriam-Webster’, Time, 28 September, https://time.com/5386603/instagram-verb-merriam-webster/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tyżlik-Carver, Magdalena (2022), ‘Screenshot situations: Imaginary realities of networked images’, in A. Dewdney and K. Sluis (eds), The Networked Image in Post-Digital Culture, London: Routledge, pp. 171–86.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Uliasz, Rebecca (2021), ‘Seeing like an algorithm: Operative images and emergent subjects’, AI & Society, 36, pp. 1233–41, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01067-y.
    [Google Scholar]
41. unthinking photography (n.d.), ‘About’, https://unthinking.photography/about. Accessed 1 September 2023.
42. Wark, McKenzie (2011), The Beach Beneath the Street: The Everyday Life and Glorious Times of the Situationist International, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wylde, Gillian (2016), ‘Will internets eat brain?’, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhkq8cQ-BWM. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]