Intersections and the becomings of disabled and queer subjectivities in Margarita with a Straw

References

1. Abrams, Thomas (2016), ‘Cartesian dualism and disabled phenomenology’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 18:2, pp. 118–28.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed, Ibtisam (2019), ‘Decolonising queer Bangladesh: Neoliberalism against LGBTQ+ emancipation’, in C. Cottet and M.L. Picq (eds), Sexuality and Translation in World Politics, Bristol: E-International Relations, https://www.e-ir.info/2019/08/16/decolonising-queer-bangladesh-neoliberalism-against-lgbtq-emancipation. Accessed 28 May 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barad, Karen (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beckman, Frida (2011), Deleuze and Sex, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bogue, Ronald (2011), ‘Alien sex: Octavia Butler and Deleuze and Guattari’s polysexuality’, in B. Frida (ed.), Deleuze and Sex, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 30–49.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bose, Shonali (2014), Margarita with a Straw, India: Ishaan Talkies.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Butler, Judith (1990), ‘Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytic discourse’, in L. J. Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, New York: Routledge, pp. 324–40.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chappell, Paul (2014), ‘How Zulu-speaking youth with physical and visual disabilities understand love and relationships in constructing their sexual identities’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16:9, pp. 1156–68.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chatterjee, Shraddha (2018), Queer Politics in India: Towards Sexual Subaltern Subjects, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chatterjee, Sohini (2022), ‘Caste, desire, and Dalit queer resistance in “Geeli Puchhi”’, Women’s Studies, 51:1, pp. 50–69.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dasgupta, Rohit K. (2022), ‘Viral assemblages and witnessing extraordinary times: Queer patchworks of intimacy, precarity and affect in an Indian city’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 43:6, pp. 880–96.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix (1977), Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, New York: Viking Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dhar, Amrita (2021), ‘Review of Disability Studies in India: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Nilika Mehrotra’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 41:1, https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/7936/5871. Accessed 26 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Duke, Thomas S. (2011), ‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth with disabilities: A meta-synthesis’, Journal of LGBT Youth, 8:1, pp. 1–52.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fadyl, Joanna K., Teachman, Gail and Hamdani, Yani (2020), ‘Problematizing “productive citizenship” within rehabilitation services: Insights from three studies’, Disability and Rehabilitation, 42:20, pp. 2959–66.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Foucault, Michel (2016), ‘The history of sexuality’, in L. Wesley and W. Daniel (eds), Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 494–500.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fox, Nick J. and Alldred, Pam (2013), ‘The sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism’, The Sociological Review, 61:4, pp. 769–89.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fritsch, Kelly (2010), ‘Intimate assemblages: Disability, intercorporeality, and the labour of attendant care’, Critical Disability Discourses, 2, https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/23854. Accessed 25 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gauci, Vickie (2021), ‘Dis/ability-producing technology assemblages and networks at the workplace: A new materialist analysis’, Disability & Society, 36:3, pp. 488–507.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ghai, Anita (2021), ‘A rendering of disability and gender in the COVID-19 era’, Disability & Society, 22:7, pp. 673–84.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goodley, Dan (2013), ‘Dis/entangling critical disability studies’, Disability & Society, 28:5, pp. 631–44.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Goodley, Dan and Tregaskis, Claire (2006), ‘Storying disability and impairment: Retrospective accounts of disabled family life’, Qualitative Health Research, 16:5, pp. 630–46.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Goodley, Dan, Lawthom, Rebecca and Runswick-Cole, Katherine (2014), ‘Posthuman disability studies’, Subjectivity, 7:4, pp. 342–61.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Goodley, Dan, Lawthom, Rebecca, Liddiard, Kirsty and Runswick-Cole, Katherine (2021), ‘Key concerns for critical disability studies’, International Journal of Disability and Social Justice, 1:1, pp. 27–49.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gopinath, Gayatri (2000), ‘Queering Bollywood: Alternative sexualities in popular Indian cinema’, Journal of Homosexuality, 39:3-4, pp. 283–97.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Grosz, Elizabeth (2017), ‘A thousand tiny sexes: Feminism and rhizomatics’, in C. V. Boundas and D. Olkowski (eds), Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy, London: Routledge, pp. 187–211.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Haraway, Donna (1985), ‘A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s’, in J. L. Nicholson (ed.), The Postmodern Turn: New Perspective on Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–107.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hossain, Adnan (2019), ‘Section 377, same-sex sexualities and the struggle for sexual rights in Bangladesh’, Australian Journal of Asian Law, 20:1, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Johnson, Kristyn (2015), ‘Sexy ambiguity and circulating sexuality: Assemblage, desire, and representation in Seba al-Herz’s The Others’, MA thesis, Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Karim, Shuchi (2014), ‘Erotic desires and practices in cyberspace: Virtual reality of the non-heterosexual middle class in Bangladesh’, Gender, Technology and Development, 18:1, pp. 53–76.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Khetarpal, Abha (2018), ‘So how has Indian cinema portrayed women with disabilities?’, Feminism in India, 22 January, https://feminisminindia.com/2018/01/22/cinema-portrayal-women-with-disabilities. Accessed 20 March 2022.
32. Lambert, Gregg (2011), ‘The “non-human sex” in sexuality: “What are your special desiring-machines?”’, in F. Beckman (ed.), Deleuze and Sex, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 135–52.
    [Google Scholar]
33. McRuer, Robert (2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. McRuer, Robert and Mollow, Anna (eds) (2012), Sex and Disability, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mehrotra, Nilika (ed.) (2020), Disability Studies in India: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mikdashi, Maya and Puar, Jasbir K. (2016), ‘Queer theory and permanent war’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 22:2, pp. 215–22.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Monforte, Javier, Pérez-Samaniego, Victor and Smith, Brett (2020), ‘Traveling material ↔ Semiotic environments of disability, rehabilitation, and physical activity’, Qualitative Health Research, 30:8, pp. 1249–61.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Morris, Jenny (1991), ‘“Us” and “them”? Feminist research, community care and disability’, Critical Social Policy, 11:33, pp. 22–39.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mulvey, Laura (1989), Visual and Other Pleasures, London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nigianni, Chrysanthi (2009), ‘Butterfly kiss: The contagious kiss of becoming-lesbian’, in C. Nigianni and M. Storr (eds), Deleuze and Queer Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 168–80.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Owens, Janine (2015), ‘Exploring the critiques of the social model of disability: The transformative possibility of Arendt’s notion of power’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 37:3, pp. 385–403.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Parisi, Luciana (2009), ‘The adventures of a sex’, in C. Nigianni and M. Storr (eds), Deleuze and Queer Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 72–91.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Puar, Jasbir K. (2005), ‘Queer times, queer assemblages’, Social Text, 23:3–4, pp. 121–39.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Puar, Jasbir K. (2007), Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Puar, Jasbir K. (2009), ‘Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity’, Women & Performance, 19:2, pp. 161–72.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Puar, Jasbir K. (2015), ‘Bodies with new organs: Becoming trans, becoming disabled’, Social Text, 33:3, pp. 45–73.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Roy, Deb L. (2022), ‘Has Indian cinema truly become inclusive?’, Firstpost, 13 April, https://www.firstpost.com/auto/opinions-auto/has-indian-cinema-truly-become-inclusive-10547801.html. Accessed 2 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sarma, Jyotishmita (2022), ‘Making sense of the occurrence of impairments among women with locomotor disabilities in Assam’, Indian Journal of Critical Disability Studies, 2:1, pp. 2–24, https://jcdsi.org/index.php/injcds/article/view/66. Accessed 25 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Shakespeare, Tom (2005), ‘Disability studies today and tomorrow’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 27:1, pp. 138–48.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Shakespeare, Tom, Gillespie-Sells, Kath and Davies, Dominic (1996), The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires, London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Sharma, Manan (2022), ‘Navigating queer representation in Indian cinema’, Film Companion, 5 March, https://www.filmcompanion.in/readers-articles/badhaai-do-gangubai-kathiawadi-geeli-pucchi-navigating-queer-representation-in-indian-cinema. Accessed 21 April 2022.
52. Shildrick, Margrit (2000), ‘Becoming vulnerable: Contagious encounters and the ethics of risk’, Journal of Medical Humanities, 21:4, pp. 215–27.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Shildrick, Margrit (2007), ‘Dangerous discourses: Anxiety, desire, and disability’, Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 8:3, pp. 221–44.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Shildrick, Margrit (2009a), Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Shildrick, Margrit (2009b), ‘Prosthetic performativity: Deleuzian connections and queer corporealities’, in C. Nigianni and M. Storr (eds), Deleuze and Queer Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 115–33.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Shildrick, Margrit (2019), ‘Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity’, in N. Watson and S. Vehmas (eds), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 30–41.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Tsiokou, Katerina (2017), ‘Body politics and disability’, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 11:2, pp. 205–22.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Waight, Emma and Yin, Yuanyuan (2021), ‘Using non-representational theory to explore older people’s travel to and from the supermarket’, Mobilities, 16:4, pp. 537–52.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wislar, M. M. Daisy (2018), ‘“What’s it like to be a lesbian with a cane?”: A story and study of queer and disabled identities’, honor’s thesis, Brunswick, ME: Bowdoin College.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Wolbring, Gregor and Ghai, Anita (2015), ‘Interrogating the impact of scientific and technological development on disabled children in India and beyond’, Disability and the Global South, 2:2, pp. 667–85.
    [Google Scholar]