Not entirely analog(ous): Low-power FM radio as community, relations and knowledge in context | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media
  4. Volume 18, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1476-4504
  • E-ISSN: 2040-1388

Abstract

At the turn of the millennium, scholars and pundits reflected on how communication systems could shape events and societies, often while basking in the perceived glow of the then-novel Internet. Others pled for reasoned engagement with the interplay between communication infrastructures and the social life of knowledge, a much-needed corrective in a moment of rampant breathless digital utopianism. This article explores the interplay between communication infrastructures and the social life of knowledge through specific sociotechnical arrangements, low-power FM (LPFM) radio and large-scale commercial Internet-based ‘platforms’, both of which exist in our historical present. In particular, I use the formation of LPFM, which occurred at the same time that commercial Internet traffic picked up steam, in order to ‘excavate the future’: I return to a not-so-distant past to consider what might yet be. The article’s central claim is that the case of LPFM is now than at its inception, in a context where behemoth commercial Internet ‘platforms’ have come to dominate electronic communication.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/rjao_00013_1
2020-04-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ananny, Mike. ( 2019;), ‘ Probably speech, maybe free: Toward a probabilistic understanding of online expression and platform governance. ’, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University , 21 August, https://knightcolumbia.org/content/probably-speech-maybe-free-toward-a-probabilistic-understanding-of-online-expression-and-platform-governance. Accessed 15 December 2019.
  2. Arvin, Maile,, Tuck, Eve, and Morrill, Angie. ( 2013;), ‘ Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. ’, Feminist Formations, 25:1, pp. 8–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagdikian, Ben. ( 2000), The Media Monopoly, , 2nd ed.., Boston, MA:: Beacon Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonini, Tiziano, and Gandini, Alessandro. ( 2019;), ‘ “First week is editorial, second week is algorithmic”: Platform gatekeepers and the platformization of music curation. ’, Social Media + Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119880006. Accessed 22 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowker, Geoffrey. ( 2010;), ‘ All knowledge is local. ’, Learning Communities: Journal of Learning in Social Contexts, 6:2, pp. 138–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bridle, James. ( 2017;), ‘ Something is wrong on the internet. ’, Medium, 6 November, https://medium.com/@jamesbridle/something-is-wrong-on-the-internet-c39c471271d2. Accessed 15 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyer, Kate. ( 2006;), ‘ Community radio licensing and policy: An overview. ’, Global Media and Communication, 2:1, pp. 129–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Darnton, Robert. ( 2000;), ‘ Paris: The early Internet. ’, New York Review of Books, 29 June, https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2000/06/29/paris-the-early-internet/. Accessed 15 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, Mike. ( 1990), City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, London:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dojcinovic, Steven. ( 2017;), ‘ Hey, Mark Zuckerberg: My democracy isn’t your laboratory. ’, New York Times, 15 November, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/opinion/serbia-facebook-explore-feed.html. Accessed 15 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Douglas, Susan. ( 1999), Listening In: Radio and the American Imagination, New York:: Times Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunbar-Hester, Christina. ( 2014), Low Power to the People: Pirates, Protest and Politics in FM Radio Broadcasting, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunbar-Hester, Christina. ( 2019;), ‘ Challenging digital utopianism: Electronic imaginaries and the second century of radio. ’, in A. Bygdås,, S. Clegg, and A. Landsverk Hagen. (eds), Media Management and Digital Transformation, London:: Routledge;, pp. 103–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dunbar-Hester, Christina. ( 2020), Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Graves, Lucas. ( 2016), Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Guess, Andrew,, Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. ( 2018), All Media Trust Is Local? Findings from the 2018 Poynter Media Trust Survey, Poynter Institute for Media Studies;, http://www-personal.umich.edu/~bnyhan/media-trust-report-2018.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Haraway, Donna. ( 1991;), ‘ A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. ’, in D. Haraway. (ed.), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 149–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Herman, Edward, and Chomsky, Noam. ( 1988), Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, New York:: Pantheon Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. House, Brian. ( 2017;), ‘ Urban intonation. ’, Brian House, https://brianhouse.net/works/urban_intonation/. Accessed 15 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Illich, Ivan. ( 1973), Tools for Conviviality, New York:: Harper & Row;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Johns, Adrian. ( 1998), The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Konieczna, Magda. ( 2018), Journalism Without Profit: Making News When the Market Fails, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lewis, Becca. ( 2020;), ‘ All of YouTube, not just the algorithm, is a far-right propaganda machine. ’, Medium.com, 7 January, https://ffwd.medium.com/all-of-youtube-not-just-the-algorithm-is-a-far-right-propaganda-machine-29b07b12430. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. McChesney, Robert. ( 1999), Rich Media, Poor Democracy, New York:: The New Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Milan, Stefania. ( 2013), Social Movements and Their Technologies: Wiring Social Change, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagourney, Adam, and Medina, Jennifer. ( 2016;), ‘ This city is 78% Latino, and the face of a new California. ’, New York Times, 12 October, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/12/us/california-latino-voters.html. Accessed 15 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Napoli, Philip, and Caplan, Robyn. ( 2017;), ‘ Why media companies insist they’re not media companies, why they’re wrong, and why it matters. ’, First Monday, 22:5, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i5.7051. Accessed 22 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Newman, Russell. ( 2019), The Paradoxes of Network Neutralities, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Pickard, Victor. ( 2020), Democracy Without Journalism? Confronting the Misinformation Society, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Pinch, Trevor, and Bijker, Wiebe. ( 1987;), ‘ The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. ’, in W. Bijker,, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch. (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 11–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pursell, Carroll. ( 1993;), ‘ The rise and fall of the appropriate technology movement in the United States, 1965–1985. ’, Technology and Culture, 34:3, pp. 629–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Riismandel, Paul. ( 2020;), ‘ The greatest flowering of community radio in history happened in the 2010s. ’, Radio Survivor, 5 January, http://www.radiosurvivor.com/2020/01/05/the-greatest-flowering-of-community-radio-in-history-happened-in-the-2010s/. Accessed 2 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodriguez, Clemencia. ( 2001), Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens’ Media, Cresskill, NJ:: Hampton Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Roose, Kevin. ( 2019;), ‘ The making of a YouTube radical. ’, New York Times, 8 June, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/08/technology/youtube-radical.html. Accessed 15 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sismondo, Sergio. ( 2017;), ‘ Post-truth?. ’, Social Studies of Science, 47:1, pp. 3–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Smulyan, Susan. ( 1994), Selling Radio: The Commercialization of American Broadcasting, 1920–1934, Washington, DC:: Smithsonian Institution Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sterne, Jonathan. ( 2016;), ‘ Analog. ’, in B. Peters. (ed.), Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society and Culture, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;, pp. 31–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Straus, Scott. ( 2007;), ‘ What is the relationship between hate radio and violence? Rethinking Rwanda’s “Radio Machete”. ’, Politics & Society, 35:4, pp. 609–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Streeter, Thomas. ( 1996), Selling the Air: A Critique of the Policy of Commercial Broadcasting in the United States, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Tsing, Anna. ( 2015), The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Turner, Fred. ( 2006), From Counterculture to Cyberculture, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Webster, Frank. ( 2002), Theories of the Information Society, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Williams, Raymond. ( 1976), Keywords, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Winner, Langdon. ( 1988), The Whale and the Reactor, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wyatt, Sally. ( 2003;), ‘ Non-users also matter. ’, in N. Oudshoorn, and T. Pinch. (eds), How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 67–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Dunbar-Hester, Christina. ( 2020;), ‘ Not entirely analog(ous): Low-power FM radio as community, relations and knowledge in context. ’, Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 18:1, pp. 13–28, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.00013_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/rjao_00013_1
Loading
Not entirely analog(ous): Low-power FM radio as community, relations and knowledge in context
Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media 18, 13 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao_00013_1
/content/journals/10.1386/rjao_00013_1
/content/journals/10.1386/rjao_00013_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): an alternate future; communication infrastructures; community radio; electronic communication; Internet; knowledge; low-power FM

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error