The Dual-Process Model

References

1. De Neys, Wim and Pennycook, Gordon (2019), ‘Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28:5, pp. 503–09.80
   [Google Scholar]
2. Evans, Jonathan S. B. (2003), ‘In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7:10, pp. 454–59.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Evans, Jonathan S. B. , Handley, Simon J. , Neilens, Helen , and Over, David (2010), ‘The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63:5, pp. 892–909.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gazzaley, Adam and Rosen, Larry D. (2016), The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High-Tech World, Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hills, Thomas T. (2019), ‘The dark side of information proliferation’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, pp. 1–8.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kahneman, Daniel and Frederick, Shane (2002), ‘Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment’, in T. Gilovich , D. Griffin , and D. Kahneman (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49–81.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1973), ‘On the psychology of prediction’, Psychological Review, 80, pp. 237–51.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kahneman, Daniel , Slovic, Paul , and Tversky, Amos (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Shah, Anuj K. and Oppenheimer, Daniel M. (2008), ‘Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework’, Psychological Bulletin, 134:2, pp. 207–22.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Stanovich, Keith E. (1999), ‘Who is rational?’, in Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning, London: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Stanovich, Keith E. and West, Richard F. (2000), ‘Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate’, Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, pp. 645–65.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Stone, Linda (2009), ‘Beyond simple multi-tasking: Continuous partial attention’, Linda Stone, 30 November, https://lindastone.net/2009/11/30/beyond-simple-multi-tasking-continuous-partial-attention/. Accessed 20 June 2023 .
    [Google Scholar]
13. Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1974), ‘Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, Science, 185:4157, pp. 1124–31.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Wason, Peter C. and Evans, Jonathan S. B. (1974), ‘Dual processes in reasoning?’, Cognition, 3:2, pp. 141–54.
    [Google Scholar]

References

1. De Neys, Wim and Pennycook, Gordon (2019), ‘Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28:5, pp. 503–09.80
   [Google Scholar]
2. Evans, Jonathan S. B. (2003), ‘In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7:10, pp. 454–59.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Evans, Jonathan S. B. , Handley, Simon J. , Neilens, Helen , and Over, David (2010), ‘The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63:5, pp. 892–909.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gazzaley, Adam and Rosen, Larry D. (2016), The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High-Tech World, Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hills, Thomas T. (2019), ‘The dark side of information proliferation’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, pp. 1–8.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kahneman, Daniel and Frederick, Shane (2002), ‘Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment’, in T. Gilovich , D. Griffin , and D. Kahneman (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49–81.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1973), ‘On the psychology of prediction’, Psychological Review, 80, pp. 237–51.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kahneman, Daniel , Slovic, Paul , and Tversky, Amos (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Shah, Anuj K. and Oppenheimer, Daniel M. (2008), ‘Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework’, Psychological Bulletin, 134:2, pp. 207–22.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Stanovich, Keith E. (1999), ‘Who is rational?’, in Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning, London: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Stanovich, Keith E. and West, Richard F. (2000), ‘Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate’, Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, pp. 645–65.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Stone, Linda (2009), ‘Beyond simple multi-tasking: Continuous partial attention’, Linda Stone, 30 November, https://lindastone.net/2009/11/30/beyond-simple-multi-tasking-continuous-partial-attention/. Accessed 20 June 2023 .
    [Google Scholar]
13. Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1974), ‘Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, Science, 185:4157, pp. 1124–31.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Wason, Peter C. and Evans, Jonathan S. B. (1974), ‘Dual processes in reasoning?’, Cognition, 3:2, pp. 141–54.
    [Google Scholar]