Changing pedagogic identities of tutors and students in the design studio: Case study of desk and peer critiques

References

1. Adams, Robin S.,, Forin, Tiago,, Chua, Mell, and Radcliffe, David. ( 2016;), ‘ Characterizing the “work of coaching” during design reviews. ’, Design Studies, Special Issue: ‘Design Review Conversations’, 45:A, pp. 30–67.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Belluigi, Dina Zoe. ( 2016;), ‘ Construction of roles in studio teaching and learning. ’, The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35:1, pp. 21–35.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biggs, John. ( 1987), Student Approaches to Learning and Studying, Melbourne:: Australian Council for Educational Research;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biggs, John,, Kember, David, and Leung, Doris Y. P.. ( 2001;), ‘ The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. ’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71:1, pp. 133–49.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biggs, John, and Tang, Catherine So-kum. ( 2007), Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, New York:: McGraw-Hill;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Campbell, Anne, and Norton, Lin. ( 2007), Learning, Teaching and Assessing in Higher Education: Developing Reflective Practice, Exeter:: Learningmatters;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Christensen, Bo T., and Ball, Linden J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Dimensions of creative evaluation: Distinct design and reasoning strategies for aesthetic, functional and originality judgments. ’, Design Studies, Special Issue: ‘Design Review Conversations’, 45:A, pp. 116–36.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cowan, John. ( 2005;), ‘ Evaluation and feedback in architectural education. ’, in D. Nicol, and S. Pilling. (eds), Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Professionalism, London and New York:: Taylor & Francis Group;, pp. 236–44.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Creswell, John W.. ( 2015), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, , 3rd ed.., Los Angeles, CA, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington, DC:: Sage Publication;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cross, Nigel. ( 2004;), ‘ Expertise in design: An overview. ’, Design Studies, 25:5, pp. 427–41.
    [Google Scholar]
11. de la Harpe, Barbara,, Peterson, J. Fiona,, Frankham, Noel,, Zehner, Robert,, Neale, Douglas,, Musgrave, Elizabeth, and McDermott, Ruth. ( 2009;), ‘ Assessment focus in studio: What is most prominent in architecture, art and design?. ’, JADE, 28:1, pp. 37–51.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Entwistle, Noel. ( 2000;), ‘ Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment. ’, Paper Presented at AAHE Assessment Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, 14–18 June.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Entwistle, Noel, and Ramsden, Paul. ( 1983), Understanding Student Learning, London:: Croom Helm;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goldschmidt, Gabriela. ( 2002;), ‘ “One-on-one”: A pedagogic base for design instruction in the studio. ’, in D. Durling, and J. Shackleton. (eds), Proceedings of  ‘Common Ground’, Design Research Society International Conference, Brunel University, 5–7 September, Stoke-on-Trent:: Staffordshire University Press;, pp. 430–37.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gray, Colin M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. ’, in J. B. Reitan,, P. Lloyd,, E. Bohemia,, L. M. Nielsen,, I. Digranes, and E. Lutnæs. (eds), Proceedings of DRS // CUMULUS 2013, 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, Oslo, 14–17 May, Oslo:: ABM-media;, pp. 702–14.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grow, Gerald O.. ( 1991;), ‘ Teaching learners to be self-directed. ’, Adult Education Quarterly, 41:3, pp. 125–49.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kember, David. ( 1998;), ‘ Teaching beliefs and their impact on students’ approach to learning. ’, in B. Dart, and G. Boulton-Lewis. (eds), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia:: Australian Council for Educational Research;, pp. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kvale, Steinar, and Brinkmann, Svend. ( 2009), InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, , 2nd ed.., Los Angeles, CA, London, New Delhi and Singapore:: Sage Publication;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Marshall, Catherine, and Rossman, Gretchen B.. ( 2010), Designing Qualitative Research, , 5th ed.., Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Marton, Ference, and Säljö, Roger. ( 1976;), ‘ On qualitative differences in learning-1: Outcome and process. ’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, pp. 4–11.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McDonnell, Janet. ( 2016;), ‘ Scaffolding practices: A study of design practitioner engagement in design education. ’, Design Studies, Special Issue: ‘Design Review Conversations’, 45:A, pp. 9–29.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Moustakas, Carl. ( 1994), Phenomenological Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Oh, Yeonjoo,, Ishizaki, Suguru,, Gross, Mark D., and Yi-Luen Do, Ellen. ( 2013;), ‘ A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. ’, Design Studies, 34:3, pp. 302–25.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Orr, Susan, and Bloxham, Sue. ( 2012;), ‘ Making judgments about students making work: Lecturers’ assessment practices in art and design. ’, Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 12:2&3, pp. 234–53.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Padilla-Díaz, Mariwilda. ( 2015;), ‘ Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science?. ’, International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1:2, pp. 101–10.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Patton, Michale Q.. ( 2002), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Prosser, Michale, and Trigwell, Keith. ( 1999), Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education, Buckingham:: Open University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Quayle, Moura. ( 1985), Ideabook for Teaching Design, Mesa, AZ:: PDA Publisher Corporation;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schön, Donald. ( 1985), The Design Studio: An Exploration of Its Traditions and Potential, London:: Royal Institute of British Architects;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Smith, Kennon M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Conditions influencing the development of design expertise: As identified in interior design student accounts. ’, Design Studies, 36, pp. 77–98.
    [Google Scholar]
31. van Manen, Max. ( 1990), Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy, New York:: State University of New York;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Vowles, Hannah. ( 2005;), ‘ The “crit” as a ritualised legitimation procedure in architectural education. ’, in D. Nicol, and S. Pilling. (eds), Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Professionalism, London and New York:: Taylor & Francis Group;, pp. 223–27.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Webster, Helena. ( 2007;), ‘ The analytics of power. ’, Journal of Architectural Education, 60:3, pp. 21–27.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wilkin, Margaret. ( 2005;), ‘ Reviewing the review. An account of a research investigation of the crit. ’, in D. Nicol, and S. Pilling. (eds), Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Professionalism, London and New York:: Taylor & Francis Group;, pp. 85–89.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Yorgancıoğlu, Derya, and Tunalı, Sevinç. ( 2020;), ‘ Changing pedagogic identities of tutors and students in the design studio: Case study of desk and peer critiques. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 19:1, pp. 19–32, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00011_1
    [Google Scholar]