Educating relational thinking to improve design creativity

References

1. Agogué, M.,, Kazakçi, A.,, Hatchuel, A.,, Masson, P.,, Weil, B.,, Poirel, N., and Cassotti, M.. ( 2014a;), ‘ The impact of type of examples on originality: Explaining fixation and stimulation effects. ’, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48:1, pp. 1–12.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agogué, M.,, Poirel, N.,, Pineau, A.,, Houdé, O., and Cassotti, M.. ( 2014b;), ‘ The impact of age and training on creativity: A design-theory approach to study fixation effects. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, pp. 33–41.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alexander, P. A.,, Dumas, D.,, Grossnickle, E. M.,, List, A., and Firetto, C. M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Measuring relational reasoning. ’, The Journal of Experimental Education, 84:1, pp. 119–51.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alipour, L., and Faizi, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ A new strategy to reduce design fixation: The middle sketching stage. ’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Design Creativity, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2–4 November.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Alipour, L.,, Faizi, M.,, Moradi, A. M., and Akrami, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ The impact of designers’ goals on design-by-analogy. ’, Design Studies, 51, pp. 1–24.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alipour, L.,, Faizi, M.,, Moradi, A. M., and Akrami, G.. ( 2018;), ‘ A review of design fixation: research directions and key factors. ’, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6:1&2, pp. 22–35.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Altshuller, G.. ( 1996), And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, Worcester, MA:: Technical Innovation Center, Inc;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ball, L. J., and Christensen, B. T.. ( 2009;), ‘ Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. ’, Design Studies, 30:2, pp. 169–86.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bearman, C.,, Ball, L. J., and Ormerod, T. C.. ( 2002;), ‘ An exploration of real-world analogical problem solving in novices. ’, in W. D. Gray, and C. D. Schunn. (eds), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ:: Erlbaum;, pp. 101–06.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Byrge, C., and Tang, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, pp. 51–61.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cardoso, C., and Badke-schaub, P.. ( 2011a;), ‘ Fixation or inspiration: Creative problem solving in design. ’, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45:2, pp. 77–82.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cardoso, C., and Badke-schaub, P.. ( 2011b;), ‘ The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. ’, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45:2, pp. 130–46.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Casakin, H.. ( 2004;), ‘ Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process: Expert versus novice performance. ’, Journal of Design Research, 4:2, pp. 253–68.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Casakin, H.. ( 2010;), ‘ Visual analogy, visual displays, and the nature of design problems: The effect of expertise. ’, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 37:1, p. 170.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Casakin, H., and Goldschmidt, G.. ( 1999;), ‘ Expertise and the use of visual analogy: Implications for design education. ’, Design Studies, 20:2, pp. 153–75.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Casakin, H. P., and Goldschmidt, G.. ( 2000;), ‘ Reasoning by visual analogy in design problem-solving: The role of guidance. ’, Environment and Planning B, 27:1, pp. 105–20.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chan, J.,, Fu, K.,, Schunn, C.,, Cagan, J.,, Wood, K., and Kotovsky, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. ’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 133:8, p. 081004.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chang, Y.-S.,, Chien, Y.-H.,, Yu, K.-C.,, Chu, Y.-H., and Chen, M. Y.-c.. ( 2016;), ‘ Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, pp. 112–22.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cheong, H., and Shu, L. H.. ( 2013;), ‘ Using templates and mapping strategies to support analogical transfer in biomimetic design. ’, Design Studies, 34:6, pp. 706–28.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chiu, F. C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Improving your creative potential without awareness: Overinclusive thinking training. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 15:0, pp. 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Christensen, B. T., and Schunn, C. D.. ( 2007;), ‘ The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. ’, Memory & Cognition, 35:1, pp. 29–38.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chrysikou, E. G.. ( 2006;), ‘ When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance. ’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32:4, p. 935.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chrysikou, E. G., and Weisberg, R. W.. ( 2005;), ‘ Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. ’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31:5, p. 1134.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dahl, D. W., and Moreau, P.. ( 2002;), ‘ The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. ’, Journal of Marketing Research, 39:1, pp. 47–60.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dean, D. L.,, Hender, J. M.,, Rodgers, T. L., and Santanen, E. L.. ( 2006;), ‘ Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. ’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7:1, p. 30.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dumas, D.,, Alexander, P. A.,, and Grossnickle, E. M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Relational reasoning and its manifestations in the educational context: A systematic review of the literature. ’, Educational Psychology Review, 25:3, pp. 391–427.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dumas, D.,, Schmidt, L. C., and Alexander, P. A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, pp. 50–66.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gentner, D.. ( 1983;), ‘ Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. ’, Cognitive Science, 7:2, pp. 155–70.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gentner, D., and Markman, A. B.. ( 1997;), ‘ Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. ’, American Psychologist, 52:1, p. 45.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gentner, D., and Medina, J.. ( 1998;), ‘ Similarity and the development of rules. ’, Cognition, 65:2, pp. 263–97.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gick, M. L., and Holyoak, K. J.. ( 1980;), ‘ Analogical problem solving. ’, Cognitive Psychology, 12:3, pp. 306–55.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Goel, A. K.. ( 1997;), ‘ Design, analogy, and creativity. ’, IEEE Expert, 12:3, pp. 62–70.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Goldschmidt, G.. ( 2011;), ‘ Avoiding design fixation: Transformation and abstraction in mapping from source to target. ’, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45:2, pp. 92–100.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gonçalves, M.,, Cardoso, C., and Badke-Schaub, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ Inspiration peak: exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli. ’, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1:4, pp. 215–32.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gordon, W. J.. ( 1961), Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, New York:: Harper;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Guilford, J. P.. ( 1987;), ‘ Creativity research: Past, present and future. ’, in J. P. Guilford. (ed.), Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics, Buffalo, NY:: Bearly;, pp. 33–65.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hargrove, R.. ( 2012;), ‘ Fostering creativity in the design studio: A framework towards effective pedagogical practices. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 10:1, pp. 7–31.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hernandez, N. V.,, Schmidt, L. C., and Okudan, G. E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Systematic ideation effectiveness study of TRIZ. ’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 135:10, p. 101009.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Holyoak, K. J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Analogy and relational reasoning. ’, in K. J. Holyoak. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, New York:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 234–59.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Holyoak, K. J., and Thagard, P.. ( 1996), Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Holyoak, K. J., and Thagard, P.. ( 1997;), ‘ The analogical mind. ’, American Psychologist, 52:1, p. 35.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Jablansky, S.,, Alexander, P. A.,, Dumas, D., and Compton, V.. ( 2016;), ‘ Developmental differences in relational reasoning among primary and secondary school students. ’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 108:4, p. 592.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Jansson, D. G., and Smith, S. M.. ( 1991;), ‘ Design fixation. ’, Design Studies, 12:1, pp. 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Karwowski, M., and Soszynski, M.. ( 2008;), ‘ How to develop creative imagination?: Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3:2, pp. 163–71.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kohn, N. W., and Smith, S. M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. ’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25:3, pp. 359–71.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Linsey, J.,, Markman, A., and Wood, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Design by analogy: A study of the WordTree method for problem re-representation. ’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 134:4, p. 041009.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Linsey, J.,, Tseng, I.,, Fu, K.,, Cagan, J.,, Wood, K., and Schunn, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. ’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 132:4, p. 041003.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Moreno, D. P.,, Hernández, A. A.,, Yang, M. C.,, Otto, K. N.,, Hölttä-Otto, K.,, Linsey, J. S.,, Wood, K. L., and Linden, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: A focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. ’, Design Studies, 35:3, pp. 232–72.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Moreno, D. P.,, Yang, M. C.,, Hernández, A. A.,, Linsey, J. S., and Wood, K. L.. ( 2015;), ‘ A step beyond to overcome design fixation: A design-by-analogy approach. ’, Design Computing and Cognition, 14, pp. 607–24.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ozkan, O., and Dogan, F.. ( 2013;), ‘ Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: Differences between expert and novice designers. ’, Design Studies, 34:2, pp. 161–92.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Peeters, J.,, Verhaegen, P. A.,, Vandevenne, D., and Duflou, J. R.. ( 2010;), ‘ Refined metrics for measuring novelty in ideation. ’, Proceedings of the IDMME – Virtual Concept 2010 – Research in Interactive Design, vol. 3, Bordeaux:: IDMME;, pp. 127–31.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Perttula, M., and Sipila, P.. ( 2007;), ‘ The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. ’, Journal of Engineering Design, 18:1, pp. 93–102.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sarkar, P., and Chakrabarti, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Assessing design creativity. ’, Design Studies, 32:4, pp. 348–83.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Segers, N. M.,, de Vries, B., and Achten, H. H.. ( 2005;), ‘ Do word graphs stimulate design?. ’, Design Studies, 26:6, pp. 625–47.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Shah, J. J.,, Smith, S. M., and Hernandez, N. V.. ( 2003;), ‘ Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. ’, Design Studies, 24:2, pp. 111–34.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tsenn, J.,, Atilola, O.,, McAdams, D. A., and Linsey, J. S.. ( 2014;), ‘ The effects of time and incubation on design concept generation. ’, Design Studies, 35:5, pp. 500–26.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Ulger, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ The creative training in the visual arts education. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, pp. 73–87.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Vosniadou, S., and Ortony, A.. ( 1989), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Ward, T. B.. ( 1998;), ‘ Analogical distance and purpose in creative thought: Mental leaps versus mental hops. ’, in K. J. Holyoak,, D. Gentner, and B. Kokinov. (eds), Advances in Analogy Research: Integration of Theory and Data from the Cognitive, Computational, and Neural Sciences, Sofia:: New Bulgarian University Press;, pp. 221–30.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Youmans, R. J.. ( 2011;), ‘ The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation. ’, Design Studies, 32:2, pp. 115–38.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Youmans, R. J., and Arciszewski, T.. ( 2014;), ‘ Design fixation: Classifications and modern methods of prevention. ’, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 28:2, pp. 129–37.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Zhao, F., and Maher, M. L.. ( 1988;), ‘ Using analogical reasoning to design buildings. ’, Engineering with Computers, 4:3, pp. 107–19.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Alipour, Leyla. ( 2020;), ‘ Educating relational thinking to improve design creativity. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 19:1, pp. 81–106, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00015_1
    [Google Scholar]