Developing pedagogy for plant study in art and design¹

References

1. Allen, W.. ( 2003;), ‘ Plant blindness. ’, BioScience, 53:10, p. 926.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, D.. ( 2011), Art, Equality and Learning: Pedagogies against the State, New York:: Springer;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biggs, M., and Karlsson, H.. ( 2010;), ‘ Evaluating quality in artistic research. ’, in M. Biggs, and H. Karlsson. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, London:: Routledge;, pp. 405–24.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bose, N.. ( 1999), Vision and Creation (trans. K. G. Subramanyan.), Calcutta:: Visva-Bharati;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Burgess, A.. ( 1967;), ‘ The modicum is the messuage. ’, The Spectator, 13 October, p. 427.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Charmantier, I.. ( 2011;), ‘ Carl Linnaeus and the visual representation of nature. ’, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 41:4, pp. 365–404.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chawla, R., and Varma, R. R.. ( 2010), Raja Ravi Varma: Painter of Colonial India, Ahmedabad:: Mapin;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cowell, C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Plant blindness and conservation implications: Wildlife includes plants too. ’, Kew Royal Botanic Gardens , 3 March, https://www.kew.org/read-and-watch/plant-blindness-conservation-implications. Accessed 9 May 2020.
9. Dewey, J.. ( 1934), Art as Experience, New York:: Perigree;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dewey, J.. ( [1938] 1997), Experience and Education, New York:: Touchstone;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Drucker, J.. ( 2014), Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Flannery, M.. ( 1988;), ‘ Eye on biology. ’, American Biology Teacher, 50:5, pp. 300–03.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Freire, P.. ( 2018), Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare Teach, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gardner, H.. ( 1983), The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, London:: Heinemann;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gardner, H.. ( 1999), Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gardner, H.. ( 2011;), ‘ The theory of multiple intelligences: As psychology, as education, as social science. ’, transcript , International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 4:2, 22 October https://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/article/view/30/465. Accessed 4 April 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gupta, U. D.. (ed.) ( 2009), The Oxford India Tagore: Selected Writings on Education and Nationalism, Delhi:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gushue, W. J.. ( 1969;), ‘ Marshall McLuhan: Educational implications. ’, McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 4:001, pp. 3–21.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hannula, M.,, Suoranta, J., and Vadén, T.. ( 2014), Artistic Research Methodology: Narrative, Power and the Public, New York:: Peter Lang;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hershey, D. R.. ( 1993;), ‘ Plant neglect in biology education. ’, BioScience, 43:7, p. 418.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hershey, D. R.. ( 2005;), ‘ Plant content in the national science education standards. ’, American Institute of Biological Sciences, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501357.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Irwin, R. L.. ( 2007;), ‘ Studio practice as a state of mind: A/r/tographic commitments as a way of being. ’, Knowhow/Minds Making Symposium, Reykjavik, 19–21 April.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kiefer, M., and Trumpp, N. M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. ’, Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1:1, pp. 15–20.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kramer, A. T.,, Zorn-Arnold, B., and Havens, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Report in brief: Assessing botanical capacity to address grand challenges in the United States. ’, Natural Areas Journal, 35:1, pp. 83–89, https://www.jstor.org/stable/90008726. Accessed 15 October 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Leshkovska, E. A., and Spaseva, S. M.. ( 2016;), ‘ John Dewey’s educational theory and educational implications of Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory. ’, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 4:2, p. 57.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mayer, R. E.. ( 2002;), ‘ Multimedia learning. ’, in B. Ross. (ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 41, San Diego, CA:: Academic Press;, pp. 85–139.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McLuhan, M., and McLuhan, M. A.. ( 1994), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Parsley, K. M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. ’, Plants, People, Planet, 2:6, pp. 598–601.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Perkins, D.. ( 1998;), ‘ What is understanding. ’, in M. Stone-Wiske. (ed.), Teaching for Understanding: Linking Research with Practice, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;, pp. 39–57.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pilgrim, S.,, Smith, D., and Pretty, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ A cross-regional assessment of the factors affecting ecoliteracy: Implications for policy and practice. ’, Ecological Applications, 17:6, pp. 1742–51.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pinney, C.. ( 2004), ‘Photos of the Gods’: The Printed Image and Political Struggle in India, New Delhi:: Reaktion Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Richards, J. H., and Lee, D. W.. ( 2002;), ‘ “To see... heaven in a wild flower”: Teaching botany in the 21st century. ’, American Journal of Botany, 89:1, pp. 172–76.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rix, M.. ( 2013), The Golden Age of Botanical Art, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sachdev, G.. ( 2019a;), ‘ Engaging with plants in an urban environment through street art and design. ’, Plants, People, Planet, 1:3, pp. 271–89.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sachdev, G.. ( 2019b;), ‘ Introduction. ’, ‘Encounters with the Botanical’, catalogue , Bangalore:: Print Brew;, https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/1QLSgHKQ-8XdIg. Accessed 24 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sanders, D. L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Standing in the shadows of plants. ’, Plants, People, Planet, 1:3, pp. 130–38.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sanders, H. M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Modes of Representation: Art exhibition. ’, University of Cincinnati, Blue Ash College;, https://ucblueash.edu/about/community/art-gallery/past-exhibits/modes-of-representation.html. Accessed 24 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Saunders, G.. ( 1995), Picturing Plants: An Analytical History of Botanical Illustration, Berkeley, CA:: Zwemmer;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Scagnetti, G.. ( 2011;), ‘ Visual epistemology for communication design education. ’, DesignEd Asia Conference 2011 Business of Design Week (BODW), Hong Kong Convention & Exhibition Center, Hong Kong, 29–30 November.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schussler, E. E., and Olzak, L. A.. ( 2008;), ‘ It’s not easy being green: Student recall of plant and animal images. ’, Journal of Biological Education, 42:3, pp. 112–19.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Stagg, B. C., and Donkin, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Teaching botanical identification to adults: experiences of the UK participatory science project “Open Air Laboratories”. ’, Journal of Biological Education, 47:2, pp. 104–10.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Stagg, B. C.,, Donkin, M. E., and Smith, A. M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Bryophytes for beginners: The usability of a printed dichotomous key versus a multi-access computer-based key for bryophyte identification. ’, Journal of Biological Education, 49:3, pp. 274–87.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Tomkins, S. S., and Alexander, I. E.. ( 1995), Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. TRRVHF ( 2019;), ‘ Introduction. ’, ‘Encounters with the Botanical’, catalogue , Bangalore:: Print Brew;, https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/1QLSgHKQ-8XdIg. Accessed 24 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wandersee, J. H., and Schussler, E. E.. ( 1999;), ‘ Preventing plant blindness. ’, American Biology Teacher, 61:2, pp. 82–86.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wandersee, J. H., and Schussler, E. E.. ( 2001;), ‘ Toward a theory of plant blindness. ’, Plant Science Bulletin, 47:1, pp. 2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sachdev, Geetanjali. ( 2021;), ‘ Developing pedagogy for plant study in art and design. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 20:2, pp. 201–22, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00039_1
    [Google Scholar]