Celebrating the variety, fighting the confusion: An integrative review of the design teacher’s pedagogical roles

References

1. AboWardah, E. S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Bridging the gap between research and schematic design phases in teaching architectural graduation projects. ’, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9:1, pp. 82–105.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adams, R. S.,, Forin, T.,, Chua, M., and Radcliffe, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Making visible the “how” and “what” of design teaching. ’, in R. S. Adams, and J. A. Siddiqui. (eds), Analyzing Design Review Conversations, West Lafayette, IN:: Purdue University Press;, pp. 431–56.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adams, R. S.,, Forin, T.,, Chua, M., and Radcliffe, D.. ( 2016;), ‘ Characterizing the work of coaching during design reviews. ’, Design Studies, 45, pp. 30–67.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Adams, R. S.,, Radcliffe, D.,, Forin, T., and Chua, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Making design pedagogical content knowledge visible within design reviews. ’, DTRS 10: Design Thinking Research Symposium 2014, West Lafayette, IN, 12–15 October.
   [Google Scholar]
5. An, J., and Powell, N.. ( 2014;), ‘ Korean University students’ perceptions of design critique. ’, Journal of Korea Design Knowledge, 31, pp. 1–10.
   [Google Scholar]
6. An, J. S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Korean University students’ attitudes towards anonymous peer critiques in graphic design education. ’, Korea Science & Art Forum (KSAF), 22, pp. 207–20.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Anderson, L. W.,, Krathwohl, D.,, Airasian, P.,, Cruikshank, K.,, Maver, R.,, Pintrich, P.,, Raths, J., and Wittrock, M.. ( 2001), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York:: Longman;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ashkan, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ The phenomenological evaluation of teaching professionalism in the architecture design studio culture: A case at the University of Kansas. ’, ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 10:1, pp. 41–61.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Attoe, W., and Mugerauer, R.. ( 1991;), ‘ Excellent studio teaching in architecture. ’, Studies in Higher Education, 16:1, pp. 41–50.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Austerlitz, N.,, Aravot, I., and Ben-Ze’ev, A.. ( 2002;), ‘ Emotional phenomena and the student–instructor relationships. ’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 60:2, pp. 105–15.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Barrett, T.. ( 2000;), ‘ Studio critiques of student art: As they are, as they could be with mentoring. ’, Theory into Practice, 39:1, pp. 29–35, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3901_5. Accessed 6 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bejtic, Z.. ( 2019;), ‘ The pedagogy of creative disciplines: Teaching techniques and approaches that increase students’ intrinsic motivation in a studio classroom. ’, Proceeding of International Conference on Advanced Research in Education, 7–9 March, London:: Diamond Scientific Publishing;, pp. 2–16.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Belluigi, D. Z.. ( 2016;), ‘ Constructions of roles in studio teaching and learning. ’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35:1, pp. 21–35.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bloom, B. S.,, Englehart, M. D.,, Furst, E. J.,, Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. R.. ( 1956), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York:: Longmans Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Boucher, L.. ( 2007;), ‘ Creative learning: Supporting design education in the 21st century. ’, master's thesis, Winnipeg:: University of Manitoba;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Brandt, C. B.,, Cennamo, K.,, Douglas, S.,, Vernon, M.,, McGrath, M., and Reimer, Y.. ( 2013;), ‘ A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. ’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23:2, pp. 329–48.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Broome, M. E.. ( 2000;), ‘ Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts. ’, in B. L. Rodgers, and K. A. Knafl. (eds), Concept Development in Nursing, Philadelphia, PA:: Saunders;, pp. 231–50.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cardoso, C.,, Eriş, Ö.,, Badke-Schaub, P., and Aurisicchio, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Question asking in design reviews: How does inquiry facilitate the learning interaction?. ’, DTRS 10: Design Thinking Research Symposium 2014, West Lafayette, IN, 12–15 October.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cardoso, C.,, Hurst, A., and Nespoli, O. G.. ( 2020;), ‘ Reflective inquiry in design reviews: The role of question-asking during exchanges of peer feedback. ’, International Journal of Engineering Education, 36:2, pp. 614–22.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cho, J. Y.. ( 2011;), ‘ Pedagogy of aesthetics: A study of three architectural design studios. ’, doctoral dissertation, Columbia, MO:: University of Missouri;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cifuentes, L.. ( 1997;), ‘ From sages to guides: A professional development study. ’, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5:1, pp. 67–77.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Çıkış, Ş., and Çil, E.. ( 2009;), ‘ Problematization of assessment in the architectural design education: First year as a case study. ’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1:1, pp. 2103–10.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cuff, D.. ( 1991), Architecture: The Story of Practice, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dannels, D. P.. ( 2005;), ‘ Performing tribal rituals: A genre analysis of “crits” in design studios. ’, Communication Education, 54:2, pp. 136–60.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Demirbaş, Ö. O.. ( 2001;), ‘ The relation of learning styles and performance scores of the students in interior architecture education. ’, doctoral dissertation, Ankara:: Bilkent University;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Demirkan, H.. ( 2016;), ‘ An inquiry into the learning-style and knowledge-building preferences of interior architecture students. ’, Design Studies, 44:3, pp. 28–51.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dinham, S. M.. ( 1987;), ‘ An ongoing qualitative study of architecture studio teaching: analyzing teacher-student exchanges. ’, ASHE Annual Meeting Paper, Baltimore, MD, 21–24 November.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Drew, L.. ( 2003;), ‘ The experience of teaching in art, design and communication. ’ Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster:: Lancaster University;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. D’Souza, N.. ( 2007;), ‘ Design intelligences: A case for multiple intelligences in architectural design. ’, ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 1:2, pp. 15–34.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Dutton, T. A.. ( 1987;), ‘ Design and studio pedagogy. ’, Journal of Architectural Education, 41:1, pp. 16–25.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Echols, S. P.. ( 1994;), ‘ Teaching design: A qualitative study of design studio instruction. ’, doctoral dissertation, Blacksburg, VA:: Virginia Tech;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Edström, A. M.. ( 2008;), ‘ Art students making use of studio conversations. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7:1, pp. 31–44.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ferreira, J.,, Christiaans, H., and Almendra, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ A visual tool for analysing teacher and student interactions in a design studio setting. ’, CoDesign, 12:1, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1135246. Accessed 6 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fitch, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Critiques, credits and credibility: Assessment practices in higher education studio art courses. ’, doctoral dissertation, Montréal:: Concordia University;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gelmez, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Delving into curriculum content and pedagogy of the first-year industrial design studio through reflective writing: A study on cognitive and affective processes. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Istanbul:: Istanbul Technical University;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gelmez, K., and Bağlı, H.. ( 2018;), ‘ Tracing design students’ affective journeys through reflective writing. ’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28:4, pp. 1061–81.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Goldschmidt, G.. ( 2002;), ‘ “One-on-one”: A pedagogic base for design instruction in the studio. ’, in D. Durling, and J. Shackleton. (eds), Design Research Society International Conference, 5–7 September, London:: Staffordshire University Press;, pp. 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Goldschmidt, G.,, Casakin, H.,, Avidan, Y., and Ronen, O.. ( 2014;), ‘ Three studio critiquing cultures: Fun follows function or function follows fun?. ’, DTRS 10: Design Thinking Research Symposium 2014, West Lafayette, IN, 12–15 October.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Goldschmidt, G.,, Hochman, H., and Dafni, I.. ( 2010;), ‘ The design studio “Crit”: Teacher-student communication. ’, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24:3, pp. 285–302.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Grasha, A. F.. ( 1996), Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles, Pittsburgh, PA:: Alliance Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Harwood, E.. ( 2007;), ‘ Artists in the academy: Curriculum and instruction. ’, in L. Bresler. (ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, Dordrecht:: Springer;, pp. 313–34.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hsiao, H. C., and Cheng, Y. S.. ( 2006;), ‘ The impact of ideology on the interaction between tutors and students in the education of industrial design: A case study in Taiwan. ’, International Journal of Educational Development, 26:1, pp. 6–23.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Janesick, V. J.. ( 1982;), ‘ Constructing grounded theory: Reflections on a case study of a professor of architectural design. ’, Studies in Art Education, 24:1, pp. 16–24.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kahvecioglu, H. L.,, Erdem, A., and Paker-Kahvecioglu, N.. ( 2002;), ‘ Short term workshop: An alternative strategy in architectural design education. ’, DS 30: Proceedings of DESIGN 2002, the 7th International Design Conference, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb;, Dubrovnik, 14–17 May.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Karslı, U. T.. ( 2015;), ‘ Factors influencing function and form decisions of interior architectural design studio students. ’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, pp. 1090–98.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Khorshidifard, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ A paradigm in architectural education: Kolb’s Model and learning styles in studio pedagogy. ’, ARCC Conference Repository, Detroit, Michigan, 20–23 April, pp. 621–34.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Krathwohl, D. R.. ( 2002;), ‘ A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. ’, Theory into Practice, 41:4, pp. 212–18.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Krathwohl, D. R.,, Bloom, B. S., and Masia, B. B.. ( 1964), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain, New York:: David Mckay Company Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kucko, J. K., and Caldwell, L. F.. ( 1994;), ‘ Redesigning the design studio to foster critical thinking. ’, Journal of Interior Design, 20:2, pp. 48–55.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kurt, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ The motivational consequences of students’ emotional responses to desk critiques in architectural design studio. ’, International Journal of Teaching & Education, 7:1, pp. 105–14.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Lecy, J., and Beatty, K. E.. ( 2012;), ‘ Representative literature reviews using constrained snowball sampling and citation network analysis. ’, SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1992601. Accessed 14 October 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Ledewitz, S.. ( 1985;), ‘ Models of design in studio teaching. ’, Journal of Architectural Education, 38:2, pp. 2–8.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lipsky, M.. ( 2010), Street-Level Bureaucracy, 30th Ann. Ed.: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service, New York:: Russell Sage Foundation;.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Lueth, P. L. O.. ( 2008;), ‘ The architectural design studio as a learning environment: A qualitative exploration of architecture design student learning experiences in design studios from first-through fourth-year. ’, retrospective theses and dissertations, Ames, IA:: Iowa State University;.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Masatlıoğlu, C. S. E., and Takkeci, M. S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Self-constructive learning in preliminary design studio. ’, Journal of Teaching Education, 5:2, pp. 95–105.
    [Google Scholar]
56. McLaren, P.. ( 1988;), ‘ The liminal servant and the ritual roots of critical pedagogy. ’, Language Arts, 65:2, pp. 164–79.
    [Google Scholar]
57. McLaren, P.. ( 1993), Schooling as a Ritual Performance: Towards a Political Economy of Educational Symbols and Gestures, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
58. McPeek, K. T.. ( 2009;), ‘ Collaborative design pedagogy: A naturalistic inquiry of architectural education. ’, doctoral dissertation, College Station, TX:: Texas A&M University;.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Mewburn, I.. ( 2011;), ‘ Lost in translation: Reconsidering reflective practice and design studio pedagogy. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11:4, pp. 363–79.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Mitchell, S. E.. ( 1996;), ‘ Institutions, individuals and talk: The construction of identity in fine art. ’, Journal of Art & Design Education, 15:2, pp. 143–54.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Moore, K. D.. ( 2001;), ‘ The scientist, the social activist, the practitioner and the cleric: Pedagogical exploration towards a pedagogy of practice. ’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 18:1, pp. 59–79.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Oak, A., and Lloyd, P.. ( 2014;), ‘ “Wait, wait, Dan, your turn”: Assessment in the design review. ’, DTRS 10: Design Thinking Research Symposium 2014, West Lafayette, IN, 12–15 October.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ochsner, J. K.. ( 2000;), ‘ Behind the mask: A psychoanalytic perspective on interaction in the design studio. ’, Journal of Architectural Education, 53:4, pp. 194–206.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Oh, Y.,, Ishizaki, S.,, Gross, M. D., and Yi-Luen Do, E.. ( 2013;), ‘ A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. ’, Design Studies, 34:3, pp. 302–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004. Accessed 6 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Onal, G. K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Teaching designing: From concept to space. ’, ARCHDESIGN’16: III. International Architectural Design Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 17–18 June.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Oxman, R.. ( 1999;), ‘ Educating the designerly thinker. ’, Design Studies, 20:2, pp. 105–22.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Paker Kahvecioğlu, N.. ( 2007;), ‘ Architectural design studio organization and creativity. ’, AZ ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 4:2, pp. 6–26.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Park, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Rethinking design studios as an integrative multi-layered collaboration environment. ’, Journal of Urban Design, 25:4, pp. 523–50.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Pektaş, Ş. T., and Gürel, M. Ö.. ( 2014;), ‘ Blended learning in design education: An analysis of students’ experiences within the disciplinary differences framework. ’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30:1, pp. 31–44.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Peterson, J. M.. ( 1979;), ‘ Me and my critics: Students’ responses to architectural jury criticism. ’, Studies in Art Education, 20:2, pp. 64–67.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Quayle, M.. ( 1985), Ideabook for Teaching Design, Mesa, AZ:: PDA Publishers Corporation;.
    [Google Scholar]
72. ‘role’ ( 2020), Cambridge Dictionary, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/role. Accessed 6 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Sachs, A.. ( 1999;), ‘ Stuckness in the studio. ’, Design Studies, 20:2, pp. 195–209.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Sawyer, R. K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Teaching creativity in art and design studio classes: A systematic literature review. ’, Educational Research Review, 22, pp. 99–113.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Schön, D. A.. ( 1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Schön, D. A.. ( 1984;), ‘ The architectural studio as an exemplar of education for reflection-in-action. ’, Journal of Architectural Education, 38:1, pp. 2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Schön, D. A.. ( 1987), Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco:: John Wiley & Sons;.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Schön, D. A.. ( 1988;), ‘ Toward a marriage of artistry and applied science in the architectural design studio. ’, Journal of Architectural Education, 41:4, pp. 4–10.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Shreeve, A. J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Transitions: Variation in tutors’ experience of practice and teaching relations in art and design. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster:: Lancaster University;.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Shreeve, A., and Batchelor, R.. ( 2012;), ‘ Designing relations in the studio: Ambiguity and uncertainty in one to one exchanges. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 3:17, pp. 20–26.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Shreeve, A.,, Sims, E., and Trowler, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ “A kind of exchange”: Learning from art and design teaching. ’, Higher Education Research & Development, 29:2, pp. 125–38.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Sipahioglu, I. R.. ( 2012;), ‘ Opening the “black-box” of interior design education: The assessment of basic design project work. ’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, pp. 420–26.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Torraco, R. J.. ( 2005;), ‘ Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. ’, Human Resource Development Review, 4:3, pp. 356–67, https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283. Accessed 6 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Uluoglu, B.. ( 2000;), ‘ Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. ’, Design Studies, 21:1, pp. 33–58.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Utaberta, N.,, Hassanpour, B.,, Ani, A. C., and Surat, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Retracted: Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio. ’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, pp. 94–102.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Utaberta, N.,, Hassanpour, B.,, Handryant, A. N., and Ani, A. I. C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Upgrading education architecture by redefining critique session in design studio. ’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, pp. 42–47.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Vanada, D. I.. ( 2016;), ‘ An equitable balance: Designing quality thinking systems in art education. ’, International Journal of Education & the Arts, 17:11, pp. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Vaughan, S.,, Austerlitz, N.,, Blythman, M.,, Grove-White, A.,, Jones, B.,, Jones, C.,, Morgan, S.,, Orr, S., and Shreeve, A.. ( 2008;), ‘ Mind the gap: Expectations, ambiguity and pedagogy within art and design in higher education. ’, in L. Drew. (ed.), The Student Experience in Art and Design Higher Education: Drivers for Change, Cambridge:: Jill Rogers Associates Limited;, pp. 125–48.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Webster, H.. ( 2004;), ‘ Facilitating critically reflective learning: Excavating the role of the design tutor in architectural education. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2:3, pp. 101–11.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Webster, H.. ( 2006;), ‘ Power, freedom and resistance: Excavating the design jury. ’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25:3, pp. 286–96.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Whittemore, R., and Knafl, K.. ( 2005;), ‘ The integrative review: Updated methodology. ’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52:5, pp. 546–53.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Wolff, K. A.. ( 2009;), ‘ The architecture studio: Its implications for instructional design education. ’, Ph.D. thesis, New York:: Teachers College, Columbia University;.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Yilmaz, S., and Daly, S. R.. ( 2014;), ‘ Influences of feedback interventions on student concept generation and development practices. ’, DTRS 10: Design Thinking Research Symposium 2014, West Lafayette, IN, 12–15 October.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Yilmaz, S., and Daly, S. R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Feedback in concept development: Comparing design disciplines. ’, Design Studies, 45 (Part A), pp. 137–58.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Yorgancıoğlu, D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Reconsidering learning-oriented assessment in design education: Challenges and opportunities. ’, The 10th International Conference on Humanities, Psychology and Social Sciences, Berlin, Germany, 20–22 March, n.p.: Diamond Scientific Publishing, pp. 68–84 .
    [Google Scholar]
96. Efilti, Pelin, and Gelmez, Koray. ( 2021;), ‘ Celebrating the variety, fighting the confusion: An integrative review of the design teacher’s pedagogical roles. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 20:2, pp. 243–87, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00041_1
    [Google Scholar]