The dynamics of practice and their relevance for the development of an open studio culture in design education

References

1. Anthony, Kathryn H.. ( 2012), Design Juries on Trial, , 20th anniversa.ry ed., Champaign:: Kathryn H. Anthony;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Argyris, Chris, and Schön, Donald A.. ( 1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA:: Addison-Wesley;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bason, Christian. ( 2014), Design for Policy, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Billet, Stephen. ( 2006;), ‘ Work, subjectivity and learning. ’, in S. Billet,, T. Fenwick, and M. Somerville. (eds), Work, Subjectivity and Learning: Understanding Learning through Working Life, Dordrecht:: Springer;, pp. 1–20.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Body, John. ( 2008;), ‘ Design in the Australian tax office. ’, Design Issues, 24:1, pp. 55–67.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, Tim, and Wyatt, Jocelyn. ( 2010;), ‘ Design thinking for social innovation. ’, Development Outreach, 12:1, pp. 29–43.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Buchanan, Richard. ( 2004), Management and Design: Interaction Pathways in Organizational Life, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burrell, Gibson, and Morgan, Gareth. ( 1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, Farnham:: Ashgate;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caldwell, Elizabeth, and Gregory, Jodi. ( 2016;), ‘ Internationalizing the art school: What part does the studio have to play?. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15:2, pp. 117–33.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Carr, Valerie L.,, Sangiorgi, Daniela,, Büscher, Monika,, Junginger, Sabine, and Cooper, Rachel. ( 2011;), ‘ Integrating evidence-based design and experience-based approaches in healthcare service design. ’, HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4:4, pp. 12–33.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cottam, Hilary, and Leadbeater, Charles. ( 2004), Open Welfare Designs on the Public Good, London:: Design Council;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dearing, Ron. ( 1997), Higher Education in the Learning Society: Main Report, London:: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office;, http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/dearing1997/dearing1997.html. Accessed 2 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Easterby-Smith, Mark,, Thorpe, Richard, and Jackson, Paul. ( 2012), Management Research, , 4th ed.., London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eteläpelto, Anneli,, Vähäsantanen, Katja,, Hökkä, Päivi, and Paloniemi, Susanna. ( 2013;), ‘ What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. ’, Educational Research Review, 10, December, pp. 45–65.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Freeman, R. Edward, and McVea, John. ( 2001;), ‘ A stakeholder approach to strategic management. ’, in M. A. Hitt,, R. E. Freeman, and J. S. Harrison. (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, Oxford:: Blackwell;, pp. 189–207.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gale, Cathy. ( 2020;), ‘ Art school as a transformative locus for risk in an age of uncertainty. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 19:1, pp. 107–18.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Glaser, Barney G.. ( 1978), Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory, Mill Valley, CA:: Sociology Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Green, Lance N., and Bonollo, Elivio. ( 2003;), ‘ Studio-based teaching: History and advantages in the teaching of design. ’, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2:2, pp. 269–72.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heapy, Joe,, King, Oliver, and Samperi, James. ( 2018), Customer-Driven Transformation: How Being Design-Led Helps Companies Get the Right Services to Market, London and New York:: Kogan Page;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hedberg, Bo L. T.,, Bystrom, Paul C., and Starbuck, William H.. ( 1976;), ‘ Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. ’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, March, pp. 41–65.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Herfurth, Lorenz, and Sinclair, Kirsty. ( 2018;), ‘ From user-centred to stakeholder-oriented service design: Implications for the role of service designers and their education based on an example from the public sector. ’, in Service Design Proof of Concept, Politecnico di Milano, 18–20 June, Linköping:: Linköping University Electronic Press;, pp. 91–104.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ioannou, Olga. ( 2018;), ‘ Opening up design studio education using blended and networked formats. ’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15:47, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jelinek, Mariann,, Romme, A. Georges L., and Boland, Richard J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Introduction to the Special Issue: Organization studies as a science for design: Creating collaborative artifacts and research. ’, Organization Studies, 29:3, pp. 317–29.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jones, Derek. ( 2022;), ‘ Exploring studio proximities: Space, time, being. ’, in D. Lockton,, S. Lenzi,, P. Hekkert,, A. Oak,, J. Sádaba, and P. Lloyd. (eds), DRS2022: Bilbao, Bilbao;, 25 June–3 July, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.344.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jones, Peter. ( 2013), Design for Care: Innovating Healthcare Experience, Brooklyn, NY:: Rosenfeld Media;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Junginger, Sabine. ( 2009;), ‘ Design in the organization: Parts and wholes. ’, Design Research Journal, 9:2, pp. 23–29.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Junginger, Sabine. ( 2017), Transforming Public Services by Design: Re-Orienting Policies, Organizations and Services around People, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kolb, David A.. ( 1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:: Prentice-Hall;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Koskinen, Ilpo, and Hush, Gordon. ( 2016;), ‘ Utopian, molecular and sociological social design. ’, International Journal of Design, 10:1, pp. 65–71.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Krippendorff, Klaus. ( 1997;), ‘ A trajectory of artificiality and new principles of design for the information age. ’, in K. Krippendorff. (ed.), Design in the Age of Information: A Report to the National Science Foundation (NSF), Raleigh, NC:: School of Design;, pp. 91–96, http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/95/. Accessed 27 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Krippendorff, Klaus. ( 2005), Semantic Turn: New Foundations for Design, Boca Raton, FL and London:: CRC;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne. ( 1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Manzini, Ezio. ( 2014;), ‘ Making things happen: Social innovation and design. ’, Design Issues, 30:1, pp. 57–66.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Marc ( 2017), in-person interview with L. Herfurth, London, 6 September.
35. McAra, Marianne, and Ross, Kirsty. ( 2020;), ‘ Expanding studio boundaries: Navigating tensions in multidisciplinary collaboration within and beyond the higher education design studio. ’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39:4, pp. 795–810.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Michael ( 2017), in-person interview with L. Herfurth, London, 1 September.
37. Mintzberg, Henry. ( 1979;), ‘ An emerging strategy of “direct” research. ’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24:4, pp. 582–89.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Morgan, Gareth. ( 2006), Images of Organization, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mortati, Marzia. ( 2022;), ‘ New design knowledge and the fifth order of design. ’, Design Issues, 38:4, pp. 21–34.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Noel, Lesley-Ann M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Here’s what we really want your class to be about! A design thinking class responds to the pandemic. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 50–70.
    [Google Scholar]
41. O’Dowd, Liam. ( 2003;), ‘ Social constructionism. ’, in R. Miller, and J. Brewer. (eds), The A-Z of Social Research, London:: Sage;, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020024.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Orr, Susan. ( 2017), Art and Design Pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, Values and Ambiguity in the Creative Curriculum, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Osborn, Alex F.. ( 1963), Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving, New York:: Scribner;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Richards, Aisha, and Finnigan, Terry. ( 2015), Embedding Equality and Diversity in the Curriculum: An Art and Design Practitioner’s Guide, York:: Higher Education Academy;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rieple, Alison,, Haberberg, Adrian, and Gander, Jonathan. ( 2005;), ‘ Hybrid organizations as a strategy for supporting new product development. ’, Design Management Review, 16:1, pp. 48–55.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Romme, A. Georges L.. ( 2003;), ‘ Making a difference: Organization as design. ’, Organization Science, 14:5, pp. 558–73.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sanders, Elizabeth, and Stappers, Pieter Jan. ( 2008;), ‘ Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. ’, CoDesign, 4:1, pp. 5–18.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N.. ( 2014;), ‘ Co-designing can seed the landscape for radical innovation and sustainable change. ’, in P. Rind Christensen, and S. Junginger. (eds), The Highways and Byways to Radical Innovation: Design Perspectives, Kolding:: Design School Kolding and University of Southern Denmark;, pp. 131–52.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sangiorgi, Daniela,, Particio, Lia, and Fisk, Raymond. ( 2017;), ‘ Designing for interdependence, participation and emergence in complex service systems. ’, in D. Sangiorgi, and A. Prendiville. (eds), Designing for Service: Key Issues and New Directions, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;, pp. 49–64.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sangiorgi, Daniela, and Prendiville, Alison. (eds) ( 2017), Designing for Service: Key Issues and New Directions, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Saviranta, Lauri, and Eloranta, Eero. ( 2014;), ‘ Transforming organizations: Linking design practices to managing organizational capabilities. ’, in Proceedings of the 19th DMI: Academic Design Management Conference, 2–4 September, London:: Design Management Institute:, pp. 2008–31.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schein, Edgar H.. ( 2004), Organizational Culture and Leadership, , 3rd ed.., San Francisco, CA:: John Wiley and Sons;.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Schön, Donald A.. ( 1992;), ‘ Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. ’, Research in Engineering Design, 3:3, pp. 131–47.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Shreeve, Alison,, Wareing, Shân, and Drew, Linda. ( 2009;), ‘ Key aspects of teaching and learning in the visual arts. ’, in H. Fry,, S. Ketteridge, and S. Marshall. (eds), A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice, , 3rd ed.., New York and London:: Routledge;, pp. 345–62.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Simon, Herbert. ( 1996), The Sciences of the Artificial, , 3rd ed.., Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Stolterman, Erik. ( 2008;), ‘ The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. ’, International Journal of Design, 2:1, pp. 55–65.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Suchman, Lucy A.. ( 2007), Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication, , 2nd ed.., Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Thoelen, Annelies,, Cleeren, Steven,, Denis, Alain,, Peters, Koen,, Van Ael, Kristel, and Willems, Helga. ( 2015), Public Service Design: A Guide for the Application of Service Design in Public Organizations (ed. A. Thoelen, and S. Cleeren.), Brussels:: Design Flanders;.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Tim ( 2017), in-person interview with L. Herfurth, London, 25 August.
60. Tovey, Mike. (ed.) ( 2015), Design Pedagogy: Developments in Art and Design Education, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Webster, Helena. ( 2008;), ‘ Architectural education after Schön: Cracks, blurs, boundaries and beyond. ’, Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3:2, pp. 63–74.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Weick, Karl E.. ( 1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Random House;.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Whicher, Anna. ( 2020), AHRC Design Fellows Challenges of the Future: Public Policy, Swindon:: Arts and Humanities Research Council;.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Yorgancıoglu, Derya, and Tunalı, Sevinç. ( 2020;), ‘ Changing pedagogic identities of tutors and students in the design studio: Case study of desk and peer critiques. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 19:1, pp. 19–32.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Herfurth, Lorenz. ( 2023;), ‘ The dynamics of practice and their relevance for the development of an open studio culture in design education. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 22:1, pp. 89–106, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00063_1
    [Google Scholar]