Art, assessment and uncertainty

References

1. Barrett, T. (1988), ‘A comparison of the goals of studio professors conducting critiques and art education goals for teaching criticism’, Studies in Art Education, 30:1, pp. 22–27.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barrett, T. (2000), ‘Studio critiques in college art courses: As they are and as they could be with mentoring’, TIP: Theory into Practice, 39:1, pp. 29–35.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bersson, R. (2005), ‘Building the literature of art pedagogy’, CAA News, 30:5, pp. 1–40.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blair, L. and Fitch, S. (2015), ‘Threshold concepts in art education: Negotiating the ambiguity in pre-service teacher identity formation’, International Journal of Education through Art, 11:1, pp. 91–102.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bogdan, R. and Biklen, S. (2007), Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, 5th ed., Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Budge, K. (2012), ‘A question of values: Why we need art and design in higher education’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 11:1, pp. 5–16.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bulka, M. (1996), ‘You call that art? A critique of the critique’, New Art Examiner, 23:6, pp. 22–25.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cannatella, H. (2001), ‘Art assessment’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26:4, pp. 319–26.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caroll, J. (2006), ‘An investigation of the relationship between artistic practice, teaching practice and research in universities’, Working Papers in Design, 4:1, https://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/12383/WPIAAD_vol4_carroll.pdf. Accessed 16 November 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cohen-Evron, N. (2002), ‘Why do good art teaches find it hard to stay in the public school system?’, Studies in Art Education, 44:1, pp. 79–94.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. L. (2008), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dineen, R. and Collins, E. (2005), ‘Killing the goose: Conflicts between pedagogy and politics in the delivery of a creative education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24:1, pp. 43–52, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00422.x.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Edstrom, A. (2008), ‘Art students making use of studio conversations’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7:1, pp. 31–44.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Elkins, J. (2001), Why Art Cannot Be Taught: A Handbook for Art Students, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Elkins, J. (2014), ‘Artists with PHDs’, personal website, http://www.jameselkins.com/yy/?page_id=305. Accessed 15 March 2019.
16. Ellmers, G. (2006), ‘Assessment practice in the creative arts: Developing a standardized assessment framework’, in Teaching and Learning Scholars Report, Wollongong: Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Elton, L. (2006), ‘Assessing creativity in an unhelpful climate’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 5:2, pp. 119–30.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fitch, S. (2016), ‘Critiques, credits and credibility: Assessment practices in higher education studio courses’, Ph.D. dissertation, Montreal: Concordia University.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Glaser, B. G. and Holton, J. (2004), ‘Remodeling grounded theory: Article 4’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5:2, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Harland, R. and Sawdon, P. (2011), ‘From fail to first: Revising assessment criteria in art and design’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 10:1, pp. 67–88.
    [Google Scholar]
22. de la Harpe, B., Peterson, J. F., Frankham, N., Zehner, R., Neale, D., Musgrave, E. and McDermott, R. (2009), ‘Assessment focus in studio: What is most prominent in architecture, art and design?’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28:1, pp. 37–51.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Harwood, E. (2007), ‘Artists in the academy: Curriculum and instruction’, in L. Bresler (ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 313–30.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hope, S. and Wait, M. (2013), ‘Assessment on our own terms’, Arts Education Policy Review, 114:1, pp. 2–12.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Johnson, B. and Christenson, L. (2008), Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Klebesadel, H. (2006), ‘Reframing studio art production and critique’, in J. Marstine (ed.), New Museum Theory and Practice: An Introduction, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 247–65.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Klebesadel, H. and Kornetsky, L. (2009), ‘Critique as signature pedagogy in the arts’, in R. A. R. Gurung, N. L. Chick and A. Haynie (eds), Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, Sterling, VA: Stylus, pp. 99–120.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kushins, J. (2007), ‘Brave new basics: Case portraits of innovation in undergraduate studio art foundations curriculum’, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lachapelle, J. R. (1991), ‘In the night studio: The professional artist as an educational role model’, Studies in Art Education, 32:3, pp. 160–70.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lavender, R. (2003), ‘The subordination of aesthetic fundamentals in college art instruction’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37:3, pp. 41–57.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lichtman, M. (2006), Qualitative Research in Education: A User’s Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Merriam, S. (2009), Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Morrisroe, J. and Roland, C. (2008), ‘A collaborative approach to preparing MFA art students to teach at the university level’, Art Journal, 67:4, pp. 87–91.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Nan, L. (2009), ‘Teaching painting and drawing at Florida State University’, Ph.D. dissertation, Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Owens, K. (2007), ‘Classroom critiques: Transforming conformity into creativity’, Industry and Higher Education, 21:5, pp. 345–51.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Salazar, S. M. (2013a), ‘Laying a foundation for artmaking in the 21st century: A description and some dilemmas’, Studies in Art Education, 54:3, pp. 246–59.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Salazar, S. M. (2013b), ‘Studio interior: Investigating undergraduate studio art teaching and learning’, Studies in Art Education, 55:1, pp. 64–78.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Salazar, S. M. (2014), ‘Educating artists: Theory and practice in college studio art’, Art Education, 67:5, pp. 32–39.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Shreeve, A., Sims, E. and Trowler, P. (2010), ‘“A kind of exchange”: Learning from art and design teaching’, Higher Education Research & Development, 29:2, pp. 125–38.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Torraco, R. J. (2005), ‘Theory development research methods’, in R. A. Swanson and E. F. Holton III (eds), Research in Organizations: Foundations and Methods of Inquiry, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler, pp. 351–74.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Vaughan, S., Austerlitz, N., Blythman, M., Grove-White, A., Jones, B., Jones, C., Morgan, S., Orr, S. and Shreeve, A. (2008), ‘Mind the gap: Expectations, ambiguity and pedagogy within art and design higher education’, in L. Drew (ed.), The Student Experience in Art and Design Higher Education: Drivers for Change, Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates, pp. 125–48.
    [Google Scholar]