(Up)rooted in mobile careers: Impacts of sustained geographic mobilities across Europe on contemporary visual artists from the Baltic States | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

This article explores the embedded and embodied ‘culture of geographic mobility’ across contemporary visual artists’ careers and its impacts on their feelings towards mobility and home. This article uncovers the under-explored aspects about artists’ lifestyles, for whom geographic cross-border mobilities across Europe are a necessity these artists’ careers. In addition to changes in mobility patterns, pace, motives over their careers, there are also changes in their feelings towards mobilities and home across their careers and as they become older (career and age wise). Mobile careers can often start with feelings of freedom and comfort in having mobile homes. However, the effects of having mobile careers long-term can result in feelings of ambivalence, tensions and anguish towards mobility vis-à-vis home. This longitudinal study draws upon two sets of interviews conducted eight years apart with the same fifteen contemporary visual artists from Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. They were first interviewed in 2013 at the emerging stage in their career and they were interviewed again in 2021 at the established stage in their career. The nexus between careers, mobility and home helps to expand the ‘mobilities paradigm’, by sharing new knowledge on contemporary visual artists’ mobilities and its effects on feelings of home across their careers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00081_1
2024-01-23
2024-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andits, P. (2015), ‘Rethinking home, belonging, and the potentials of transnationalism: Australian Hungarians after the fall of the Berlin Wall’, Ethos, 43:4, pp. 31331.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ardittis, S. (1994), The Politics of East-West Migration, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry, K., Southern, J., Baxter, T., Blondin, S., Booker, C., Bowstead, J., Butler, C., Dillon, R., Ferguson, N., Filipska, G., Hieslmair, M., Hunt, L., Ianchenko, A., Johnson, P., Keane, J., Koszolko, M., Qualmann, C., Rumsby, C., Oliveira, C., Schleser, M., Sodero, S., Soliz, A., Wilson, L., Wood, H. and Zinganel, M. (2023), ‘An agenda for creative practice in the new mobilities paradigm’, Mobilities, 18:3, pp. 34973.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker, H. S. (1982), Art Worlds, London: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, C. (2016), ‘Peripatetic artists: Creative mobility and resourceful displacement’, in T. Duncan, S. Cohen and M. Thulemark (eds), Lifestyle Mobilities, London: Routledge, pp. 2134.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blunt, A. and Dowling, R. (2006), Home: Key Ideas in Geography, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brah, A. (1996), Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Buffel, T. (2015), ‘Ageing migrants and the creation of home: Mobility and the maintenance of transnational ties’, Population Space and Place, 23:5, pp. 20528.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Büscher, M. (2014), ‘Nomadic work: Romance and reality: A response to Barbara Czarniawska’s “Nomadic Work as Life-Story Plot”’, Computer Supported Cooperation Work, 23:2, pp. 22338.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butcher, M. (2010), ‘From “fish out of water” to “fitting in”: The challenge of re-placing home in a mobile world’, Population, Space and Place, 16:1, pp. 2336.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Caluwé, C. de, van Dooren, W., Delafortry, A. and Janvier, R. (2014), ‘Mind-sets of boundaryless careers in the public sector: The vanguard of a more mobile workforce?’, Public Personnel Management, 43:4, pp. 490519.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clifford, J. (1997), Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cresswell, T. (2010), ‘Towards a politics of mobility’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28:1, pp. 1731.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Desjarlais, R. (2005), ‘Movement, stillness: On the sensory world of a shelter for the “homeless mentally ill”’, in D. Howes (ed.), Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, Oxford: Berg, pp. 36979.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dorow, S., Roseman, S. R. and Cresswell, T. (2017), ‘Re-working mobilities: Emergent geographies of employment-related mobility’, Geography Compass, 11:12, https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12350.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Duester, E. (2021), Migration and Mobility in the Art World: Transnational Baltic Artistic Practices across Europe, Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Edensor, T. (2016), ‘Commuter: Mobility, rhythm and commuting’, in T. Cresswell and P. Merriman (eds), Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 189203.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Faulconbridge, J. and Hui, A. (2016), ‘Traces of a mobile field: Ten years of mobilities research’, Mobilities, 11:1, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2015.1103534.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gregson, N. (2023), ‘Work, labour and mobility: Opening up a dialogue between mobilities and political economy through mobile work’, Mobilities, 18:6, pp. 888902, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2158041.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gustafson, P. (2009), ‘Mobility and territorial belonging’, Environment and Behavior, 41:4, pp. 490508.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hannam, K. and Roy, S. (2013), ‘Cultural tourism and the mobilities paradigm’, in M. Smith and G. Richards (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Cultural Tourism, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 14147.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hautala, J. and Nordström, P. (2019), ‘Creative city, mobility, and creativity: Finnish artists in Berlin’, Mobilities, 14:6, pp. 85974.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hermelin, B. and Trygg, K. (2012), ‘New geographies of work: A case study from Sweden’, Urbani izziv, 23:1, pp. 12734, https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-supplement-1-012.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Herod, A. (1997), ‘From a geography of labor to a labor geography: Labor’s spatial fix and the geography of capitalism’, Anti-pode, 29:1, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00033.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hislop, D. and Axtell, C. (2007), ‘The neglect of spatial mobility in contemporary studies of work: The case of telework’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 22:1, pp. 3451.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Inkson, K. and Thorn, K. (2010), ‘Mobility and careers’, in S. Carr (ed.), The Psychology of Global Mobility: International and Cultural Psychology, New York: Springer, pp. 25978.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Katz, C. and Monk, J. (1993), Full Circles: Geographies of Women over the Life Course, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaufmann, V. (2002), Rethinking Mobility: Contemporary Sociology, Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaufmann. V. and Viry, G. (2015), ‘High mobility as social phenomenon’, in V. Kaufmann and G. Viry (eds), High Mobility in Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kelly, P. F. (2012), ‘Labor, movement: Migration, mobility, and geographies of work’, in T. J. Barnes, J. Peck and E. Sheppard (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Economic Geography, vol. 21, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 43143.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelly, M. (2013), Onward Migration: The Transnational Trajectories of Iranians Leaving Sweden, Geographica 1, Uppsala: Uppsala University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. King, R. (2002), ‘Towards a new map of European migration’, International Journal of Population Geography, 8:2, pp. 89106.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Korpela, M. (2020), ‘Searching for a countercultural life abroad: Neo-nomadism, lifestyle mobility or bohemian lifestyle migration?’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46:15, pp. 335269.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Leese, M. and Wittendorp, S. (2017), Security/Mobility: Politics of Movement, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lindström, S. (2016), ‘Artists and multiple job holding: Breadwinning work as mediating between Bohemian and entrepreneurial identities and behavior’, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 6:3, pp. 4358, https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v6i3.5527.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lingo, E. and Tepper, S. (2013), ‘Looking back, looking forward: Arts-based careers and creative work’, Work and Occupations, 40:4, pp. 33763.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lipphardt, A. (2012), ‘Artists on the move: Theoretical perspectives, empirical implications’, in A. Hollywood and A. Schmid (eds), a.rtists in Transit/How to Become an Artist in Residence, Berlin: IGBK, pp. 10922.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Marcu, S. (2014), ‘Geography of belonging: Nostalgic attachment, transnational home and global mobility among Romanian immigrants in Spain’, Journal of Cultural Geography, 31:1, pp. 32645.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McGahern, U. (2023), ‘Cross-border mobilities: Mobility capital and the capital accumulation strategies of Palestinian citizens of Israel’, Mobilities, 18:6, pp. 90319, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2161932.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Morgan, G. and Nelligan, P. (2018), The Creativity Hoax: Precarious Work in the Gig Economy, London and New York: Anthem Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Moskalewicz, M. (2017), The Travelers: Voyage and Migration in New Art from Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn: Lugemik.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nekby, L. (2006), ‘The emigration of immigrants, return vs onward migration: evidence from Sweden’, Journal of Population Economics, 19:1, pp. 197226.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Nochlin, L. (1996), ‘Art and the conditions of exile: Men/women, emigration/expatriation’, Poetics Today, 17:3, pp. 31737.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nowicka, M. (2007), ‘Mobile locations: Construction of home in a group of mobile transnational professionals’, Global Networks, 7:1, pp. 6986.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ong, A. (1999), Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ossman, S. (2013), Moving Matters: Paths of Serial Migration, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ralph, D. and Staeheli, L. (2011), ‘Home and migration: Mobilities, belongings and identities’, Geography Compass, 5:7, pp. 51730.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rapport, N. and Dawson, A. (1998), Migrants of Identity: Perceptions of Home in a World of Movement, London: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Razzoli, D., Montanari, F., Mizzau, L. and Rodighiero, S. (2020), ‘Need for space: How artists rely on space to face precarious work conditions’, Sociologia del Lavoro, 157:1, pp. 16485, https://doi.org/10.3280/SL2020-157009.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rhode, B. (1993), ‘Brain drain, brain gain, brain waste: Reflections on the emigration of highly educated and scientific personnel from Eastern Europe’, in R. King (ed.), The New Geography of European Migrations, London: Belhaven, pp. 22845.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Roos, H. (2013), ‘In the rhythm of the global market: Female expatriates and mobile careers: A case study of Indian ICT professionals on the move’, Gender, Work, & Organization, 20:2, pp. 14757, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12016.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ross, A. (2008), ‘The new geography of work: Power to the precarious?’, Theory, Culture & Society, 25:7&8, pp. 3149.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sandu, D. (2010), ‘Home orientation in transnational spaces of Romanian migration’, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai: Sociologia, 2:1, pp. 1536.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006), ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38:2, pp. 20726, https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2016), ‘Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm’, Applied Mobilities, 1:1, pp. 1025.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Shirmohammadi, M., Beigi, M. and Stewart, J. (2018), ‘Understanding skilled migrants’ employment in the host country: A multidisciplinary review and a conceptual model’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30:1, pp. 96121.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Thornton, S. (2014), ‘Introduction’, in 33 Artists in 3 Acts, London: Granta Publications, pp. xiiixviii.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Toplak, K. (2017), ‘Artists’ mobility in the EU: Between opportunities and impediments’, Dve domovini, 46:46, pp. 7185, http://twohomelands.zrc-sazu.si/uploads/articles/1507449912_Kristina_Toplak.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Vargas-Silva, C. and Rienzo, C. (2019), ‘Migrants in the UK: An overview’, in C. Vargas-Silva and C. Rienzo (eds), Briefing Paper: Migration Observatory, Oxford: University of Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Vertovec, S. (2009), Transnationalism, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Waite, L. (2009), ‘A place and space for a critical geography of precarity?’, Geography Compass, 3:1, pp. 41233.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00081_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error