Learning ‘flow’: The anatomy of Lulesámi handicraft | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Craft Research
  4. Volume 13, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-4689
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4697

Abstract

While it is acknowledged that craftwork has the potential to generate well-being, relatively few empirical studies explore how this happens in practice. Some scholars have used the theoretical concept and phenomenological experience of ‘flow’ to analyse why craft-makers find their work satisfying and engaging. This article builds on such scholarship by empirically demonstrating how ‘flow experiences’ emerge. Drawing on anthropological fieldwork among Lulesámi craft-makers in Northern Norway, the article argues that ‘flow’ should not be taken for granted or seen as a straightforward and easily achieved benefit of craft. Instead, it is a skilful practice that requires learning, collaboration, time and repeated, embodied effort. It involves the transformation of the body through collaborative learning; something that makes ‘flow experiences’ not only learnt but deeply personal and communal at the same time. Through a detailed ethnographic account of how ‘flow’ emerges through the making of the (characteristic dress), the article provides important insights into contemporary Lulesámi craftsmanship at the same time as it speaks to the wider literature on craft, well-being and learning.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00067_1
2022-03-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adapon, J.. ( 2008), Culinary Art and Anthropology, Oxford:: Berg;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainley, P., and Rainbird, H.. (eds) ( 1999), Apprenticeship: Towards a New Paradigm of Learning, London:: Kogan Page Limited;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aira, E.. ( 2000), Ave, bátteja vuoddaga: Band från lulesamiskt område, Jokkmokk:: Sameslöjdstiftelsen Sámi Duodji, Same Ätnam;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aira, E.,, Tuolja, K., and Sandberg, A.-L. P.. ( 1995), Julevsáme gárvo Jåhkåmåhke suoknan: Lulesamiska dräkter i Jokkmokkssocken, Jokkmokk:: Ájtte Svenskt Fjäll- och Samemuseum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Beach, H.. ( 1994;), ‘ Saami life and handicraft. ’, in B. Klein, and M. Widbom. (eds), Swedish Folk Art: All Tradition Is Change, New York:: Harry N. Abrams in association with Kulturhuset Stockholm, the Swedish Institute and Museum of International Folk Art;, pp. 98–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger, J.. ( [1972] 1990), Ways of Seeing, London:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bunn, S.. ( 1999;), ‘ The importance of materials. ’, Journal of Museum Ethnography, 11, pp. 15–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bunn, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ Materials in making. ’, in T. Ingold. (ed.), Redrawing Anthropology: Materials, Movements, Lines, Farnham:: Ashgate;, pp. 21–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chansky, R.. ( 2010;), ‘ A stitch in time: Third-wave feminist reclamation of needled imagery. ’, The Journal of Popular Culture, 43:4, pp. 681–700.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Corkhill, B.. ( 2014), Knit for Health and Wellness: How to Knit a Flexible Mind and More, Bath:: FlatBear Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Coy, M. W.. (ed.) ( 1989), Apprenticeship: From Theory to Method and Back Again, Albany, NY:: State University of New York Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M.. ( [1992] 2002), Flow: The Psychology of Happiness, London:: Rider;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Csordas, T. J.. (ed.) ( 1996), Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Downey, G.. ( 2005), Learning Capoeria: Lessons in Cunning from an Afro-Brazilian Art, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Downey, G.. ( 2007;), ‘ Seeing with a “sideways glance”: Visuomotor “knowing” and the plasticity of perception. ’, in M. Harris. (ed.), Ways of Knowing: New Approaches in the Anthropology of Knowledge and Learning, Oxford:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 222–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunfjeld, M.. ( 2006), Tjaalehtjimmie: form og innhold I sørsamisk ornamentikk, Snåsa:: Saemien Sijte;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fabian, J.. ( 1983), Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Feld, S.. ( [1982] 1990), Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics and Song in Kaluli Expression, Philadelphia, PA:: University of Pennsylvania Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grasseni, C.. ( 2004), ‘Skilled vision. An apprenticeship in breeding aesthetics’, Social Anthropology, 12:1, pp. 41–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Grasseni, C.. ( 2007;), ‘ Communities of practice and forms of life: Towards a rehabilitation of vision?. ’, in M. Harris. (ed.), Ways of Knowing: New Approaches in the Anthropology of Knowledge and Learning, Oxford:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 203–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Grasseni, C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in C. Grasseni. (ed.), Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards, Oxford:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gustafsson, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Beauty as a capacity: A study of hands-in-craft. ’, in S. Bunn. (ed.), Anthropology and Beauty: From Aesthetics to Creativity, London:: Routledge;, pp. 189–203.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gustafsson, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Invisible craftsmanship: Lulesámi women’s craft production at home. ’, Journal of Modern Craft, 12:2, pp. 109–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Guttorm, G.. ( 2001;), ‘ Duoji bálgát: en studie i duodji: kunsthåndverk som visuell erfaring hos et urfolk. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Tromsø:: University of Tromsø.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Guttorm, G.. ( 2007;), ‘ Duodji – hvem eier kunskapen og verkene?. ’, in J. T. Solbakk. (ed.), Tradisjonell kunnskap og opphavsrett, Karasjok:: Sámikopiija;, pp. 61–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Herzfeld, M.. ( 2004), The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Howes, D.. ( 1991;), ‘ Sensorial anthropology. ’, in D. Howes. (ed.), The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;, pp. 167–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Howes, D.. ( [2003] 2006), Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory, Ann Arbor, MI:: University of Michigan Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ingold, T.. ( 2000), The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ingold, T.. ( 2011;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in T. Ingold. (ed.), Redrawing Anthropology: Materials, Movements, Lines, Farnham:: Ashgate;, pp. 21–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Jackson, M.. ( 1989), Paths Toward a Clearing: Radical Empiricism and Ethnographic Inquiry, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kihlberg, K.. ( 1994), Samernas Slöjd: Virtuoserna och legenderna, Rosvik:: Förlagshuset Nordkalotten;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kihlberg, K.. ( 1996), Dáiddaduodji: En bok om samiskt konsthantverk: The Art Handicraft of the Sami, Rosvik:: Förlagshuset Nordkalotten;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kihlberg, K.. ( 1999), Den stora boken om Samernas slöjd, Giheta Dáidu: The Great Book of Sámi Handicraft, Rosvik:: Förlagshuset Nordkalotten;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lampitt, A. K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Understanding why women knit: Finding creativity and “flow”. ’, TEXTILE, 16:1, pp. 84–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee Potter, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Knitting: A craft and a connection. ’, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38:7, pp. 600–02.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Makovicky, N.. ( 2010;), ‘ “Something to talk about”: Notation and knowledge-making among Central Slovak lace-makers. ’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 16:1, pp. 80–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Marchand, T.. ( 2001), Minaret Building and Apprenticeship in Yemen, Richmond:: Curzon Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Marchand, T.. ( 2008;), ‘ Muscles, morals and mind: Craft apprenticeship and the formation of person. ’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 56:3, pp. 245–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Marchand, T.. ( 2009), The Masons of Djenné, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Marchand, T.. ( 2010;), ‘ Making knowledge: Explorations of the indissoluble relation between minds, bodies, and environment. ’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 16:1, pp. 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Meløe, J.. ( 1998;), ‘ The two landscapes of Northern Norway. ’, Inquiry, 1998:3, pp. 387–401.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Nemorovsky, R.. ( 2020;), ‘ On the continuities between craft and mathematical practices. ’, in S. Bunn, and V. Mitchell. (eds), The Material Culture of Basketry: Practice, Skill and Embodied Knowledge, London:: Bloomsbury Visual Arts;, pp. 57–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pallasmaa, J.. ( 2005), The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses, Chichester:: John Wiley & Sons Ltd;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Pallasmaa, J.. ( 2009), The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture, Chichester:: John Wiley & Sons Ltd;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Pálsson, G.. ( 1994;), ‘ Enskilment at sea. ’, Man (N.S.), 29:4, pp. 901–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Riley, J.,, Corkhill, B., and Morris, C.. ( 2013;), ‘ The benefits of knitting for personal and social wellbeing in adulthood: Findings from an international survey. ’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76:2, pp. 50–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Robertson, K., and Vinebaum, L.. ( 2016;), ‘ Crafting community. ’, TEXTILE, 14:1, pp. 2–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Stoller, P.. ( 1989), The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Senses in Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA:: University of Pennsylvania Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Waldén, L.. ( 1994), Handen och Anden: De textila studiecirklarnas hemligheter, Stockholm:: Carlsson Bokförlag;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Willerslev, R.. ( 2009;), ‘ “To have the world at a distance”: Reconsidering the significance of vision for social anthropology. ’, in C. Grasseni. (ed.), Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards, Oxford:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 23–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Gustafsson, Anna. ( 2022;), ‘ Learning “flow”: The anatomy of Lulesámi handicraft. ’, Craft Research, 13:1, pp. 89–108, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00067_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00067_1
Loading
Learning ‘flow’: The anatomy of Lulesámi handicraft
Craft Research 13, 89 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00067_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00067_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00067_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Circumpolar North; craft; dress; learning; skilled practice; well-being

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error