Ways we are connected to the world: Craft and/or science? | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Craft Research
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Craft Sciences
  • ISSN: 2040-4689
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4697

Abstract

Craft research is becoming an established, but sometimes also controversial, part of the international academic community. Consequently, it is a science in the socially accepted sense. However, as the experience from Sweden shows, there are also doubts about whether craft research is yet to be considered as a full-blown science, because it has not yet reached a ‘theoretical level’. In this article, I focus on the notion of science in order to find meeting points between the methodological and the epistemological aspects of the sciences and the crafts, that is the human aspects of the sciences and the crafts. In particular, I want to throw light on the human aspects of theories, with reference to Thomas Kuhn’s ideas of normal science. A main point is that ‘theories’ may be expressed in and by practices, not only by words, but that we should not ask if a theory is expressed in words or practices or in other ways. I argue that the most important entrance to the understanding of the notions of science, craft and theory is through the notion of communities of mutual learning, which cannot grow and develop without both agreements and disagreements, sometimes perhaps unsolvable disagreements. However, ‘unsolvable’ is not a final stop, but rather a point of departure for further, or other, questions.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00077_1
2022-09-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Drake, S.. ( 1980), Galileo, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Dreyfus, H., and Dreyfus, S.. ( 1986), Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, New York:: Free Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Gadamer, H.-G.. ( 1988;), ‘ On the circle of understanding. ’, in J. M. Connolly, and T. Keutner. (eds), Hermeneutics versus Science: Three German Views (trans. J. M. Connolly, and T. Keutner.), Notre Dame:: Notre Dame University Press;, pp. 68–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibson, J. J.. ( 2015), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, New York and London:: Psychology Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Groth, C.. ( 2017), Making Sense through Hands: Design and Craft Practice Analysed as Embodied Cognition, Alto University Publication Series: Doctoral Dissertations 1/2017, Helsinki:: Alto ART Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Høgseth, H. B.. ( 2013;), ‘ The language of craftmanship. ’, in M. Sørensen, and K. Rebay-Salisbury. (eds), Embodied Knowledge: Historical Perspectives on Belief and Technology, Oxford:: Oxbow Books;, pp. 95–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ingold, T.. ( 2000), The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kokko, S.,, Almevik, G.,, Høgseth, H. B., and Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Mapping the methodologies of the craft sciences in Finland, Sweden and Norway. ’, Craft Research, 11:2, pp. 177–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuhn, T. S.. ( 1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, , 2nd ed.., Chicago, IL:: Chicago University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Mills, C. W.. ( 1959;), ‘ On intellectual craftsmanship. ’, in The Sociological Imagination, New York:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 195–226.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Molander, B.. ( 2015), The Practice of Knowing and Knowing in Practices, Frankfurt am Main:: Peter Lang;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Molander, B.. ( 2017;), ‘ Tankens frihet och längtan efter verklighet. Om “teori” som idé, begrepp och retorik. ’, in G. Almevik. (ed.), Hantverksvetenskap, Göteborgs:: Hantverkslaboratoriet, Göteborgs universitet;, pp. 15–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Molander, B.. ( 2022;), ‘ Freedom of thought and the longing for reality: About “theory” as an idea, a concept, and rhetoric. ’, in T. Westerlund,, C. Groth, and G. Almevik. (eds), Craft Sciences, Gothenburg Studies in Conservation, Gothenburg:: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis;, pp. 374–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Niedderer, K., and Roworth-Stokes, S.. ( 2007;), ‘ The role and use of creative practice in research and its contribution to knowledge. ’, in S. Poggenpohl. (ed.), Proceeding of the Second Conference of International Association of Societies of Design Research, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 12–15 November, Hong Kong:: Hong Kong Polytechnic University, School of Design;, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Niedderer, K., and Townsend, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ Designing craft research: Joining emotion and knowledge. ’, The Design Journal, 17:4, pp. 624–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Nightingale, A. W.. ( 2004), Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Polanyi, M.. ( 1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London:: Routledge & Kegan Paul;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Polanyi, M.. ( 1966), The Tacit Dimension, Chicago, IL:: Chicago University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Putnam, R. A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Taking pragmatism seriously. ’, in D. Macarthur,, H. Putnam, and R. A. Putnam (eds)., Pragmatism as a Way of Life: The Lasting Legacy of William James and John Dewey, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;, pp. 13–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Tempte, T.. ( 1982), Arbetets Ära: Om hantverk, arbete och några rekonstruerade verktyg och maskiner, Stockholm:: Arbetslivscentrum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Thorstensen, O.. ( 2015), En snekkers dagbok, Stavanger:: Pelikanen;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Westerlund, T.. ( 2017), Trädgårdsmästarens förökningsmetoder, Göteborg:: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Westerlund, T.,, Groth, C., and Almevik, G.. ( 2022;), ‘ Explorations in the craft sciences. ’, in T. Westerlund,, C. Groth, and G. Almevik. (eds), Craft Sciences, Gothenburg Studies in Conservation, Gothenburg:: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis;, pp. 2–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Wittgenstein, L.. ( 2009), Philosophical Investigations (eds P. M. S. Hacker, and J. Schulte., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe,, P. M. S. Hacker, and J. Schulte.), , 4th ed.., Oxford:: Wiley-Blackwell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Molander, Bengt. ( 2022;), ‘ Ways we are connected to the world: Craft and/or science?. ’ Craft Research, 13:2, pp. 221–36, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00077_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00077_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): craft practices; craft science; learning communities; normal science; philosophy; scientific practices; theory

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error