Exploratory factor analysis of sustainable craft theory among Finnish craft hobbyists

References

1. Bamford, R. (2011), ‘Ecology and the aesthetics of imperfect balance’, Craft + Design Enquiry, 3:3, pp. 1–28.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brundtland, G. H. (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dillon, P. (2018), ‘Making and its cultural ecological foundations’, in S. Walker, M. Evans, T. Cassidy, J. Jung and A. T. Holroyd (eds), Design Roots, Culturally Significant Designs, Products and Practices, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 71–82.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dillon, P. and Kokko, S. (2017), ‘Craft as cultural ecologically located practice: Comparative case studies of textile crafts in Cyprus, Estonia and Peru’, Craft Research, 8:2, pp. 193–222.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017), ‘A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future’, 10 December, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/A-New-Textiles-Economy_Full-Report_Updated_1-12-17.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2022.
6. Fabrigar, L. R. and Wegener, D. T. (2012), Exploratory Factor Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Finch, W. H. (2013), ‘Exploratory factor analysis’, in T. Teo (ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research, Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp. 167–86.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fletcher, K. (2008), Sustainable Fashion & Textiles, London: Earthscan.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fry, T. (2009), Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice, Oxford: Berg.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gauntlett, D. (2011), Making Is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Craftivity, from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Groth, C. (2017), ‘Making sense through hands: Design and craft practice analysed as embodied cognition’, Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki: Aalto University.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Guion, R. M. (2002), ‘Validity and reliability’, in S. G. Rogelberg (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 57–76.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hackney, F. (2013), ‘Quiet activism and the new amateur’, Design and Culture, 5:2, pp. 169–93.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Harrison, K. and Ogden, C. A. (2019), ‘“Grandma never knit like this”: Reclaiming older women’s knitting practices from discourses of new craft in Britain’, Leisure Studies, 38:4, pp. 453–67.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hughes, P. (2011), ‘Towards a post-consumer subjectivity: A future for the crafts in the twenty first century?’, Craft + Design Enquiry, 3:3, pp. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hutcheson, G. D. and Sofroniou, N. (1999), The Multivariate Social Scientist: Introductory Statistics Using Generalized Linear Models, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ihatsu, A.-M. (2002), ‘Making sense of contemporary American craft’, Ph.D. thesis, Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
    [Google Scholar]
18. ‘Immaterial’ (2022a), Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/immaterial. Accessed 15 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ‘Intangible’ (2022b), Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intangible. Accessed 15 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Iwasaki, Y. (2008), ‘Pathways to meaning-making through leisure-like pursuits in global contexts’, Journal of Leisure Research, 40:2, pp. 231–49.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jakob, D. (2012), ‘Crafting your way out of the recession? New craft entrepreneurs and the global economic downturn’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6:1, pp. 127–40.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kenning, G. (2015), ‘“Fiddling with threads”: Craft-based textile activities and positive well-being’, Textile, 13:1, pp. 50–65.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kim, J.-O. and Mueller, C. W. (1995), ‘Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it’, in M. S. Lewis-Beck (ed.), Factor Analysis and Related Techniques, International Handbook of Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences, London: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 75–156.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kokko, S. and Kaipainen, M. (2015), ‘The changing role of cultural heritage in traditional textile crafts from Cyprus’, Craft Research, 6:1, pp. 9–30.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kokko, S. and Räisänen, R. (2019), ‘Craft education in sustaining and developing craft traditions: Reflections from Finnish craft teacher education’, Techne Series A, 26:1, pp. 27–43.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kotimaisten kielten keskus ja Kielikone Oy (2022), ‘Aineeton’ (‘Immaterial’), Kotimaisten kielten keskus, 15 December, https://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/#/aineeton?searchMode=all. Accessed 15 December 2022.
27. Kouhia, A. (2016), ‘Unrevealing the meaning of textile hobby craft’, Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Morse, J. M. (2017), ‘Developing quantitative theory’, in J. M. Morse (ed.), Analyzing and Conceptualizing the Theoretical Foundation of Nursing, New York: Spinger Publishing Company, pp. 509–27.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Niinimäki, K. (2011), ‘From disposable to sustainable’, Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki: Aalto University.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Niinimäki, K. (2015), ‘Ethical foundations in sustainable fashion’, Textiles and Clothing Sustainability, 1:1, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Niinimäki, K., Durrani, M. and Kohtala, C. (2021), ‘Emerging DIY activities to enable well-being and connected societies’, Craft Research, 12:1, pp. 9–29.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Norton, B. G. (2015), Sustainable Values, Sustainable Change: A Guide to Environmental Decision Making, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nugraha, A. (2012), ‘Transforming tradition’, Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki: Aalto University.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Orton-Johnson, K. (2014), ‘Knit, purl and upload: New technologies, digital mediations and the experience of leisure’, Leisure Studies, 33:3, pp. 305–21.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R. and Sullivan, J. J. (2003), Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pfister, C. (2010), ‘The “1950s syndrome” and the transition from a slow-going to a rapid loss of global sustainability’, in F. Uekoetter (ed.), The Turning Point of Environmental History, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 90–118.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pöllänen, S. (2013), ‘The meaning of craft: Craft makers’ descriptions of craft as an occupation’, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20:3, pp. 217–27.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pöllänen, S. H. (2015a), ‘Crafts as leisure-based coping: Craft makers’ descriptions of their stress-reducing activity’, Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31:2, pp. 83–100.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pöllänen, S. (2015b), ‘Elements of crafts that enhance well-being’, Journal of Leisure Research, 47:1, pp. 58–78.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pöllänen, S. and Weissmann-Hanski, M. K. (2019), ‘Hand-made well-being: Textile crafts as a source of eudaimonic well-being’, Journal of Leisure Research, 51:3, pp. 348–65.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Räisänen, R. (2019), ‘Promoting Finnwool with green production and sustainability: Aspects from the past to the future, from crafts to industry’, Textile, 17:3, pp. 259–76.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Riley, J., Corkhill, B. and Morris, C. (2013), ‘The benefits of knitting for personal and social wellbeing in adulthood: Findings from an international survey’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76:2, pp. 50–57.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Risatti, H. (2007), Theory of Craft: Function and Aesthetic Expression, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rissanen, T. (2014), ‘The fashion system through a lens of zero-waste fashion design’, in K. Fletcher and M. Tham (eds), Routledge Handbook of Sustainability and Fashion, London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 201–09.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sajn, N. (2020), Sustainable Consumption: Helping Consumers Make Eco-Friendly Choices, n.p.: European Parliament, European Parliamentary Research Service, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2020)659295. Accessed 8 April 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Salonen, A. O. (2019), ‘Transformative responses to sustainability’, in W. Leal Filho (ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Salonen, A. O. and Konkka, J. (2015), ‘An ecosocial approach to well-being: A solution to the wicked problems in the era of anthropocene’, Foro de Educación, 13:19, pp. 19–34.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sandhu, A. (2020), ‘Fashioning wellbeing through craft: A case study of Aneeth Arora’s strategies for sustainable fashion and decolonizing design’, Fashion Practice, 12:2, pp. 172–92.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sennett, R. (2008), The Craftsman, London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sherburne, A. (2009), ‘Achieving sustainable textiles: A designer’s perspective’, in R. S. Blackburn (ed.), Sustainable Textiles Life Cycle and Environmental Impact, Oxford: Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp. 3–32.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Solomon, E. (2013), ‘Homemade and hell raising through craft, activism, and do-it-yourself culture’, PsychNology Journal, 11:1, pp. 11–20.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Suoheimo, M., Tang, T. and Juvonen, T. (2021), ‘A visual tool for understanding wicked problems in design research: A case study of marginalized youth unemployment’, Design Journal, 24:6, pp. 955–76.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Suomen virallinen tilasto (SVT) (2018), Vapaa-ajan osallistuminen (‘Leisure-time participation’), Helsinki: Tilastokeskus, https://www.stat.fi/til/vpa/. Accessed 2 December 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tung, F.-W. (2012), ‘Weaving with rush: Exploring craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft’, International Journal of Design, 6:3, pp. 71–84.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tung, F.-W. (2021), ‘An entrepreneurial process to build a sustainable business for indigenous craft revitalization’, Design Journal, 24:3, pp. 363–83.
    [Google Scholar]
56. United Nations (2019), The Future Is Now: Science for Achieving Sustainable Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
57. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2013), UNESCO Science: For Peace and Sustainable Development, Paris: UNESCO.
    [Google Scholar]
58. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2018), Basic Texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2018 Edition, Paris: UNESCO, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/2003_Convention_Basic_Texts-_2018_version-EN.pdf. Accessed 4 November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Väänänen, N. (2020), ‘Sustainable craft dismantled and reassembled’, Ph.D. thesis, Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Väänänen, N. and Pöllänen, S. (2020), ‘Conceptualizing sustainable craft: Concept analysis of literature’, Design Journal, 23:2, pp. 263–85.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Väänänen, N. and Pöllänen, S. (2021), ‘Sustainability in Finnish craft education: United Nations sustainable development goals of the 2030’, in W. Leal Filho, A. L. Salvia and F. Frankenberger (eds), Teaching Sustainable Development, Hamburg: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 121–32.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Väänänen, N., Pöllänen, S., Kaipainen, M. and Vartiainen, L. (2017), ‘Sustainable craft in practice: From practice to theory’, Craft Research, 8:2, pp. 257–84.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Väänänen, N., Vartiainen, L., Kaipainen, M., Pitkäniemi, H. and Pöllänen, S. (2018), ‘Understanding Finnish student craft teachers’ conceptions of sustainability’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19:5, pp. 963–86.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Vilhunen, K. (2018), ‘Neuleblogi osana käsitöitä: Neulebloggaajien kokemuksia blogin ja käsitöiden yhdistämisestä’ (‘Knitting blog as part of craft’), Ph.D. thesis, Joensuu: Itä-Suomen yliopisto.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Vilhunen, K., Pöllänen, S. and Pitkäniemi, H. (2021), ‘Reasons for knitting blogging and its importance for crafting’, Techne Series, 28:3, pp. 48–62.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Walker, S., Evans, M. and Mullagh, L. (2019), ‘Meaningful practices: The contemporary relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures’, Craft Research, 10:2, pp. 183–210.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Watson, M. and Shove, E. (2008), ‘Product, competence, project and practice: DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 8:1, pp. 69–89.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T. and Steinberger, J. K. (2020), ‘Scientists’ warning on affluence’, Nature Communications, 11:3107, pp. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Yair, K. and Schwarz, M. (2011), ‘Making value: Craft in changing times’, Cultural Trends, 20:3–4, pp. 309–16.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Zafarmand, S. J., Sugiyama, K. and Watanabe, M. (2003), ‘Aesthetic and sustainability: The aesthetic attributes promoting product sustainability’, Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 3:3–4, pp. 173–86.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Zhan, X. and Walker, S. (2018), ‘Value direction: Moving crafts toward sustainability in the Yangtze River delta, China’, Sustainability, 10:4, pp. 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Zhan, X., Walker, S., Hernandez-Pardo, R. and Evans, M. (2017), ‘Craft and sustainability: Potential for design intervention in crafts in the Yangtze River delta, China’, Design Journal, 20:supplement 1, pp. S2919–S2934.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Zhang, W., Walker, S., Evans, M. and Bennett, J. (2021), ‘Inheritors of the Yellow River: The relationship of heritage making practices to cultural self-confidence in China’, International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 5:1, pp. 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]