Learning drawing: Sustaining the primacy of visualcy within a neo-liberal artschool curriculum

References

1. Bourriaud, Nicolas. (1998), Relational Aesthetics, Paris:: Les Presses du Reel;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Flew, Terry. (2014);, 'Six theories of neoliberalism'. , Thesis Eleven, 122:1, pp. 49-71.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Halliday, Michael A. K.. (2005);, 'On matter and meaning: The two realms of human experience', Linguistics and the Human Sciences. , 1: 1, pp. 59-82.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Harvey, David. (2016);, 'Neoliberalism is a political project', Jacobin. , 23 July, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/07/david-harvey-neoliberalism-capitalism-labor-crisis-resistance/. Accessed 1 June 2019 .
5. Jelinek, Alana. (2013), This Is Not Art, London:: I.B.Tauris.;
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kenning, Dean. (2018);, 'Art world strategies: Neoliberalism and the politics of professional practice in fine art education'. , Journal of Visual Art Practice, 18:2, pp. 115-31.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kester, Grant. (2013);, 'The device laid bare: On some limitations in current art criticism'. , e-flux, 50, December, pp. 1-11.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Martin, Ben. (2016);, 'What's happening to our universities?', Science Policy Research Papers, Working Paper Series, 2016-03. , Brighton:: Sussex University;, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/research/swps. Accessed 3 August 2018 .
   [Google Scholar]
9. Maynard, Patrick. (2005), Drawing Distinctions: The Varieties of Graphic Expression, Ithaca and London:: Cornell University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. McGettigan, Andrew. (2013), The Great University Gamble: Money, Markets and the Future of Higher Education, London:: Pluto Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Petherbridge, Deanna. (2010), The Primacy of Drawing: Histories and Theories of Practice, New Haven and London:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Petherbridge, Deanna. (2019);, 'The drawing experiment at the Royal College of Art, 1995-2001'. , in R. Hickman. (ed.), The International Encyclopaedia of Art and Design Education, London:: John Wiley & Sons;, pp. 1-20.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Radice, Hugh. (2013);, 'How we got here: UK Higher Education under neoliberalism'. , ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 12:3, pp. 407-18.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rancière, Jacques. (2009), Aesthetics and its Discontents, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Rawson, Philip. (1979), Seeing Through Drawing, London:: BBC;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Riley, Howard. (2013);, 'Visual art and social structure: The social semiotics of relational art'. , Visual Communication, 12:2, pp. 207-16.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Riley, Howard. (2019);, 'Drawing as language: The systemic-functional semiotic argument'. , Journal of Visual Art Practice, 18:2, pp. 132-44, https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2018.1537640. Accessed 8 January 2019 .
    [Google Scholar]
18. Sher, Benjamin. ([1925] 1990);, 'Translator's introduction'. , in V. Shklovsky. (ed.), Theory of Prose, Elmwood Park, IL:: Dalkey Archive Press;, pp. xv-xxi.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Shklovsky, Viktor. ([1917] 1977);, 'Art as device'. , in M. O'Toole, and A. Shukman. (eds), Russian Poetics in Translation: Vol. 4 Formalist Theory, Oxford:: Holdan Books;, pp. 92-99.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Willett, John. (ed.) (1964), Brecht on Theatre, New York:: Hill and Wang;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Witkin, Robert W.. (1995), Art and Social Structure, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Riley, H.. (2019);, 'Learning drawing: Sustaining the primacy of visualcy within a neo-liberal artschool curriculum'. , Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice, 4:2, pp. 299-309, doi: 10.1386/drtp_00009_1
    [Google Scholar]