Drawing dust | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2057-0384
  • E-ISSN: 2057-0392

Abstract

Over the last few years, I have become increasingly interested in how the material power of dust can be explored through the affective process of drawing to generate a new way of looking at the inevitable disintegration of the material world around us. This paper will discuss a body of drawings and prints that show how art and science have very different ways of investigating and communicating with the world around us. I am looking to science to provide an image, a particular view of the world, generating otherwise inaccessible information, but I then use a material art practice to incorporate things that are beyond the reach of science, things that science cannot engage with – the emotional, irrational, imaginative and historical ways in which we live. The body of work under discussion emerges from a research project undertaken in collaboration with an expert in the field of scientific imaging and analysis to examine particles of dust. The project considers dust as an overlooked and valuable material archive that can speak in a new way about human history and our material lives. Using state-of-the-art scientific technologies, I am able to make visible otherwise invisible particles of dust, the material that persists and remains, the omnipresent evidence of past existence. Key to the project is how the technological image that emerges from scientific analysis looks unlike anything we ordinarily see around us. The technology used to produce the scientific image creates something that seems distant, disconnected from our experience. It is this disconnection that drives me to use the slow pace and the tactile, material body of graphite drawing to transform the image using the eye and the hand in order to reconnect it with a more human, understandable way of knowing about the world.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00032_1
2020-12-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amato, J. A.. ( 2000), A History of the Small & the Invisible, Berkeley, LA and London:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, J.. ( 2008), John Berger: Berger on Drawing (ed. J. Savage.), Ireland:: Occasional Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Denes, A.. ( 1989), Book of Dust: The Beginning and the End of Time and Thereafter, Rochester, NY:: Visual Studies Workshop Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dillon, B.. ( 2009;), ‘ A dry black veil. ’, Cabinet Magazine, 35, Fall, www.cabinetmagazone.org/issues/35/dillon.php. Accessed 9 February 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Focillon, H.. ( [1989] 2007), The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies (ed. M. Paterson.), Oxford and New York:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van Fraassen B. C.. ( 1999;), ‘ The manifest image and the scientific image. ’, in D. Aerts,, J. Broekaert, and E. Mathijs. (eds), Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol. 1, Dordrecht:: Springer;, p.1. www.princeton.edu/~fraassen/abstract/MANIFEST.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Grazioli, E.. ( 2004), La Polvere nell’arte, Milano:: Bruno Mondadori;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Holmes, H.. ( 2001), The Secret Life of Dust: From the Cosmos to the Kitchen Counter, the Big Consequences of Little Things, New York:: John Wiley & Sons;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. The Holy Bible ( n.d.), King James version, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
  10. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ( [1964] 2004;), ' Eye and mind. ', in T. Baldwin. (ed.), Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Basic Writings, London and New York:: Routledge Press;, p. 121.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Merleau-Ponty, M.. ( 2002), The Phenomenology of Perception, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nancy, J. L.. ( 2008), Corpus (trans. R. A. Rand.), New York:: Fordham University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Newman, M.. ( 2004;), ‘ Sticking to the world – Drawing as contact. ’, in C. De Zegher. (ed.), Guiseppe Penone: The Imprint of Drawing, New York:: The Drawing Center;, pp. 2942.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Paterson, M.. ( 2007), The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies, Oxford and New York:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sebald, W. J.. ( 2012), On the Natural History of Destruction, London:: Notting Hill Editions;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sellars, W.. ( 1963), Science, Perception, and Reality, New York:: Humanities Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Steedman, C.. ( 2001), Dust, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wittgenstein, L.. ( 2007), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, New York:: Cosimo;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Love, Johanna. ( 2020;), ‘ Drawing dust. ’, Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice, 5:2, pp. 193208, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00032_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00032_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00032_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): art and science collaboration; drawing; dust; history; perception; time
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error