Observation of perception, considered through drawing | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2057-0384
  • E-ISSN: 2057-0392

Abstract

The article presents and discusses an observational approach to drawing, where the objective is to articulate some features of visual perception implicated in and by the drawing process. Besides drawing, the author recorded such investigation through an action camera placed in front of his eyes and simultaneously recorded his spoken comment on the activity. The camera became the principle motif of the drawing, along with observation of certain operative biological features of perception, especially binocularity and peripheral vision. The article reflects on a first drawing involving three layers that simultaneously generated three videos and monologues. A second drawing was then developed from a more knowing stance, based on the considerations raised by the first drawing. Of such considerations, these were principally the question of timeframe, framing of experience, procrastination and doubt and, as it were, disengaged focus. The theoretical bases of the latter were founded in part on the author’s existing knowledge brought to the first drawing, and in part explored in the second drawing through what reflection on the article’s question had raised during its development. While the spoken monologues were intended to shed light on the objective of the drawings, consideration is given to how they also shaped the drawings. Sections of the monologues as transcripts are shown in relation to video screenshots and discussed for their contribution to the drawings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00035_1
2020-12-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bailly, L.. ( 2009), Lacan, Oxford:: Oneworld;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Böhme, G.. ( 2003;), ‘ The space of bodily presence and space as a medium of representation. ’, in M. Hård,, A. Lösch, and D. Verdicchio. (eds), Transforming Spaces: The Topological Turn in Technology Studies, Darmstadt:: Technische Universität Darmstadt;, pp. 17, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f5a2/c65023e437eeb398222f601b052ec42875ed.pdf. Accessed 18 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Findlay, J. M., and Gilchrist, L. D.. ( 2001;), ‘ Visual attention: The active vision perspective. ’, in M. Jenkin, and L. Harris. (eds), Vision and Attention, New York:: Springer;, pp. 83103, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-21591-4_5. Accessed 26 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gombrich, E.. ( [1956] 1977), Art and Illusion, London:: Phaidon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Harari, R.. ( 2004), Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, New York:: Other Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, L., and Pashler, H.. ( 2007;), ‘ A Boolean map theory of visual attention. ’, Psychological Review, 114:3, pp. 599631, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Boolean-map-theory-of-visual-attention.-Huang-Pashler/4d9381bf001b05f9b379a76432c98e535156e847. Accessed 28 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lacan, J.. ( [2002] 2006), Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English, London and New York:: Norton;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lacan, J.. ( 2016), The Sinthome. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XXIII (ed. J.-A. Miller.), New York:: Norton;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Noë, A.. ( [2004] 2006), Action in Perception, Cambridge, MA and London:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pallasmaa, J.. ( [2012] 2018), The Eyes of the Skin, London:: Wiley;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Roudinesco, E.. ( [1994] 1997), Jacques Lacan, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tatler, B. W.,, Wade, N. J.,, Kwan, H.,, Findlay, J. M., and Velichkovsky, B. M.. ( 2010;), ‘ Yarbus, eye movements and vision. ’, i-perception, 1:1, pp. 727, https://doi.org/10.1068/i0382. Accessed 27 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yarbus, A. L.. ( 1967), Eve Movements and Vision, New York:: Plenum Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Croft, Michael. ( 2020;) ‘ Observation of perception, considered through drawing. ’, Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice, 5:2, pp. 241259, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00035_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00035_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/drtp_00035_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error