Comparative study on digital inclusion among socially vulnerable activists and leaderships of organized social movements in Brazil | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1539-7785
  • E-ISSN: 2048-0717

Abstract

This article analyses the challenges experienced by activists with social vulnerabilities who continued their activism online or face-to-face during the pandemic, focusing especially on Black and Indigenous women. I have also studied the types of resistance found in the period between March 2020 and July 2021. On the other hand, I will analyse leaders of organized social movements – or those in the process of formalization – to understand how these leaders organized themselves in the digital world. This qualitative and quantitative research was carried out through online questionnaires and online focus groups composed by activists with social vulnerabilities and leaders of organized social movements in different parts of Brazil. Due to a long period of turmoil, social division, self-isolation and perpetual stress have become the daily norm in our country. As we faced various political conflicts and social trials, the strength of our relationships and associations allowed us to endure. This research will also follow the digital difficulties in Brazil, finding levels of partial and total digital exclusion among the analysed groups. Despite the difficulties of navigating the digital world, activists and leaders of Brazilian social movements sought alternatives through resistance and solidarity, including sharing access to the internet via cell phones. This reflection is based on the research finished in December 2021 for the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Foundation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00147_1
2023-03-21
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Castells, M. (2002), A Sociedade em Rede, vol. 1, São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Castro, C. (2022), Democracy and Representation: New Forms of Representation While Facing Digital Transformation, Instituto Lula and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Brasil, https://institutolula.org/2022_politicaerepresentacao_livreto01.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavenaghi, S. and Diniz, J. (2018), ‘Mulheres Chefes de Família no Brasil: Avanços e desafios’, Revista Estudos Sobre Seguros, 32, pp. 5354, https://www.ens.edu.br/arquivos/mulheres-chefes-de-familia-no-brasil-estudo-sobre-seguro-edicao-32_1.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (CGI.br) (2020), Metodologia adaptada, São Paulo: CGI.br.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (CGI.br) (2021), ‘Pesquisa Sobre o Uso das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação nos Domicílios Brasileiros’, TIC Domicílios, 21 June, https://cetic.br/pt/noticia/uso-da-internet-avanca-em-areas-rurais-durante-a-pandemia-revela-nova-edicao-da-tic-domicilios. Accessed 19 November 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crenshaw, K. (1989), ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989:1, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/. Accessed 25 October 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gatti, B. A. (2005), Grupo focal na pesquisa em Ciências sociais e humanas, Brasília: Líber Livro.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Indicador de Alfabetismo Funcional (INAF) (2018), ‘Série Histórica’, https://alfabetismofuncional.org.br/alfabetismo-no-brasil/. Accessed 19 November 2021.
  9. Marques de Melo, J. (2003), História do Pensamento Comunicacional: Cenários e personagens, São Paulo: Paulus.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Morin, E (2005), Introdução ao Pensamento Complexo, Porto Alegre: Ed. Meridional/Sulina.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosi, A. (2019), ‘Dia do Índio é Data Folclórica e Preconceituosa, Diz Escritor Indígena Daniel Mundukurum’, BBC News, https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-4797196. Accessed 25 November 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sales, A. L., Fontes, F. and Yasui, S. (2019), ‘Militância e ativismo no Brasil depois de Junho de 2013: Entre repertórios, estratégias e Instituições’, Revista Psicologia Política, 19:45, pp. 15469.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Castro, Cosette (2023), ‘Comparative study on digital inclusion among socially vulnerable activists and leaderships of organized social movements in Brazil’, Explorations in Media Ecology, 22:1, pp. 514, https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00147_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/eme_00147_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error