Skip to content
1981
Marginalized Identities and ADH Abstracts
  • ISSN: 2050-0726
  • E-ISSN: 2050-0734

Abstract

Mass manufactured garments for women have been around since the beginning of the twentieth century. With mass production, a ‘standardization’ of sizing was needed. Standardization of clothing was difficult as bodies were (and still today) not statistically proportionate and clothing was not one size fits all. To tackle the ‘difficult’ to fit – fat women, known as stout – manufacturers and retailers devised myriad sized numbering systems to accommodate different shaped fat bodies. They introduced half, odd and extra sizes along with stylish, stubby and old-fashioned stouts to create perfectly proportioned and specially designed garments to fit stout women with little to no alterations. These systems were confusing for consumers, retailers and manufacturers as no sizing system corresponded with any sort of standardization among businesses. This frustration further relegated fat women to the fringes of the apparel industry as undesirable and unfashionable.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00164_1
2023-01-11
2026-04-19

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. A. B. C. Co. Inc. (1917), ‘A. B. C. Co Inc. advertisement’, Evening Capital News, 16 October, p. 6.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anon. (1900), ‘Fine cloth jackets’, Harrisburg Telegraph, 2 February, p. 8.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (1911a), ‘Special models of suits in large sizes’, Women’s Wear, 8 March, p. 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. (1911b), ‘The stout woman’s blouse and dress’, Ladies Home Journal, October, p. 29.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anon. (1912), ‘Women’s ready-made dresses in odd sizes’, Women’s Wear, 24 October, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Anon. (1914a), ‘Stout and maternity dresses, Israel and Ashendorf’, Women’s Wear, 31 January, p. 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Anon. (1914b), ‘Stylish though stout’, Ladies Home Journal, June, p. 49.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anon. (1915a), ‘Bernstein Baum Cravis and Co.’, Women’s Wear, 14 September, p. 7.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Anon. (1915b), ‘Making designers’, Women’s Wear, 27 July, pp. 1, 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Anon. (1915c), ‘Scientific specialization in stouts: A Malsin believes that it is impossible to fit all types of stouts according to a single standard’, Women’s Wear, 9 July, pp. 4, 9.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Anon. (1915d), ‘Smart apparel for stout figures by Lane Bryant’, Town & Country, 20 September, p. 36.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Anon. (1915e), ‘Winning the trade of stout women: Manufacturer who specializes says about 35 per cent of women may be classified as stouts’, Women’s Wear, 10 September, pp. 5, 8.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Anon. (1916a), ‘Manufacturers that specialize in clothing for women that can’t reduce’, Sioux City Journal, 12 March, p. 13.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Anon. (1916b), ‘Selling “stouts” in the showroom’, New York Times, 26 November, p. E8.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Anon. (1917a), ‘Developing a stouts department’, Women’s Wear, 3 January, p. 31.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Anon. (1917b), ‘J. A. Goldstein advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 27 September, p. 12.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Anon. (1917c), ‘Miller Maid advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 16 July, p. 9.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Anon. (1918), ‘Cater by method to stout persons’, New York Times, 11 August, p. 28.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Anon. (1919a), ‘Catering to stout model’, Women’s Wear, 13 September, p. 12.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Anon. (1919b), ‘H. and I. Ottenstein advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 18 July, p. 8.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Anon. (1919c), ‘J. Dunn advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 17 December, p. 20.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Anon. (1919d), ‘Testing accuracy of sizes protects retailers against substitution’, Women’s Wear, 4 June, pp. 36–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Anon. (1921a), ‘M. Canady and Sons advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 30 December, p. 7.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Anon. (1921b), ‘M. Gross and Company advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 19 February, p. 19.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Anon. (1921c), ‘The stout woman’s bogus thinness’, Philadelphia Inquirer, 25 September, p. 73.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Anon. (1922a), ‘Business world’, New York Times, 10 August.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Anon. (1922b), ‘Stoutwear: Regular-size models meet underwear demands of large percentage of stout women, according to D. E. Sicher representative’, Women’s Wear, 25 May, p. 30.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Anon. (1923), ‘Says Assn. size standards are incorrect’, Women’s Wear, 19 November, p. 21.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Anon. (1925a), ‘Make “size 36” mean 36 bust, says designer in standardization report’, Women’s Wear, 12 September, p. 9.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Anon. (1925b), ‘Standard measurement problem analyzed and remedies suggest in report’, Women’s Wear, 1 July, pp. 27, 39.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Anon. (1926a), ‘Makes analysis of sizes and suggests improvements for merchandising them’, Women’s Wear, 2 March, pp. 35–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Anon. (1926b), ‘Max Schenk and Company advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 2 February, p. 13.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Anon. (1926c), ‘Producer notes retailers cater more and more to special types of women’, Women’s Wear, 1 February, p. 41.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Anon. (1926d), ‘Proposes new plan to use standard scale of size markings for dresses’, Women’s Wear, 2 February, p. 33.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Anon. (1927), ‘Everything new for spring’, Morgan County Democrat, 10 March, p. 11.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Associated Stylish Stout-Wear Makers (1916), ‘Advertisement’, Women’s Wear, 24 July, p. 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Baker, Lilian C. W. (1932), Clothing Selection and Purchase, New York: The Macmillan Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Beazley, Lillian Stoll (1926), Stylish Stouts, Atchison, KS: J. R. Hellener.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. The Bee Hive (1914), ‘The Bee Hive store advertisement’, The Rock Island Argus, 18 June, p. 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Blackwelder, Julia (1997), Now Hiring: The Feminization of Work in the United States, 1900–1995, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Brine’s Bargain (1909), ‘Buy Brine’s Bargains’, Boston Globe, 12 September, p. 13.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Brown, Dorothy M. (1987), Setting a Course: American Women in the 1920s, Boston, MA: Twayne.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Buttrick, Helen Goodrich (1923), Principles of Clothing Selection, New York: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Culver’s Department Store (1900), ‘Culver’s Department Store advertisement’, Yonkers Statesman, 4 January, p. 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Ettenson-Winnig Co. (1916), ‘Ettenson-Winnig store advertisement’, The Leavenworth Post, 6 January, p. 8.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gould, Grace M. (1911), The Magic of Dress, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Grube’s (1916), ‘Four entirely separate and distinct types of stout size garments advertisement’, Logansport Pharos-Tribune, 17 March, p. 12.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hoff, Victoria and Hancock, Olivia (2022), ‘This survey suggests an “ideal” body type: Here’s why that’s problematic’, Byrdie, 1 February, https://www.byrdie.com/body-standards-survey. Accessed 6 June 2022.
  49. Joselit, Jenna Weissman (2001), A Perfect Fit: Clothes, Character, and the Promise of America, New York: Henry Holt.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Kaufman’s (1907), ‘Kaufman’s Underselling Store advertisement’, Harrisburg Daily Independent, 13 March, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Kaufman’s (1909), ‘Kaufman’s Underselling Store advertisement’, Harrisburg Daily Independent, 1 April, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaufman’s (1913a), ‘Kaufman’s Underselling Store advertisement’, Harrisburg Daily Independent, 14 March, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Kaufman’s (1913b), ‘We fit them all: Nobody is hard to fit at Kaufman’s’, Harrisburg Daily Independent, 28 February, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaufman’s (1915), ‘Kaufman’s Underselling Store advertisement’, Harrisburg Telegraph, 10 September, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Kaufman’s (1916), ‘Kaufman’s Underselling Store advertisement’, Harrisburg Daily Independent, 19 October, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kaufman’s (1922), ‘Kaufman’s Underselling Store advertisement’, Harrisburg Evening News, 22 November, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Keist, Carmen (2017), ‘Stout women can now be stylish’, Dress, 43:2, pp. 99–117, https://doi.org/10.1080/03612112.2017.1300474. Accessed 12 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Keist, Carmen N. (2012), ‘The new costumes of odd sizes: Plus-sized women’s fashions, 1910–1929’, Ph.D. dissertation, Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Keist, Carmen N. (2018), ‘How stout women were left out of high fashion: An early twentieth-century perspective’, Fashion, Style & Popular Culture, 5:1, pp. 25–40, https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc.5.1.25_1. Accessed 4 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Keist, Carmen N. and Marcketti, Sara B. (2013), ‘The new costumes of odd sizes: Plus-sized women’s fashions, 1920–1929’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31:4, pp. 259–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X13503184. Accessed 17 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Kessler-Harris, Alice (2004), Out to Work: A History of Wage Earning Women in the United States, New York: Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kidwell, Claudia B. and Christman, Margaret C. (1974), Suiting Everyone: The Democratization of Clothing in America, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Lancaster News (1914), ‘Odd Size Suit Sale’, 7 January.
  64. Lane Bryant (1930–31), ‘Instrument for taking measurements’, in Style Book for Stout Women and Misses, Fall/Winter, Indianapolis, IN: Lane Bryant Company, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Louis (1914), ‘Styles for stouts’, Women’s Wear, 20 November, pp. 1, 7.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lundt and Company (1921), ‘Lundt and Co advertisement’, The Rock Island Argus, 14 September, p. 10.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Mahoney, Tom and Sloane, Leonard (1966), The Great Merchants: America’s Foremost Retail Institutions and the People Who Made Them Great, New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. McCann, Jane (2014), ‘“Older consumers”: Understanding sizing, body shapes and requirements of apparel for this niche’, in M. E. Faust (ed.), Designing Apparel for Consumers: The Impact of Body Shape and Size, Cambridge: Woodhead, pp. 132–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Miller’s (1916), ‘Quality garments for large women advertisement’, Bangor Daily News, 2 March, p. 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Montgomery Ward (1902), Montgomery Ward Catalogue, Chicago, IL: Montgomery Ward Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Montgomery Ward (1912), Montgomery Ward Catalogue, Chicago, IL: Montgomery Ward Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Montgomery Ward (1916–17), Montgomery Ward Catalogue, Chicago, IL: Montgomery Ward Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Montgomery Ward (1921), Montgomery Ward Catalogue, Chicago, IL: Montgomery Ward Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Montgomery Ward (1926), Montgomery Ward Catalogue, Chicago, IL: Montgomery Ward Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Nystrom, Paul H. (1928), The Economics of Fashion, New York: Ronald Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Parsons, Jean (2002), ‘No longer a “frowsy drudge”: Woman’s wardrobe management: 1880–1930’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 20:1, pp. 33–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Peiss, Kathy (1985), Cheap Amusements: Working Women and Leisure in Turn-of-the-Century New York, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Picken, Mary Brooks (1918), The Secrets of Distinctive Dress, Scranton, PA: Women’s Institute of Domestic Arts and Sciences.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Picken, Mary Brooks (1924), Harmony in Dress, Scranton, PA: Women’s Institute of Domestic Arts and Sciences.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Prager’s (1904), ‘Prager’s always reliable’, San Francisco Chronicle, 28 February, p. 11.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Rathbone, Lucy and Tarpley, Elizabeth (1931), Fabrics and Dress, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Robey, Tracy E. (2019), ‘Anyone with a body knows that clothing sizes are flawed: Could there be a fix?’, Vox, 17 October, https://www.vox.com/2019/10/17/20898585/sizing-fit-prediction-clothing-bodyscan-made-to-order. Accessed 13 June 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Scanlon, Jennifer (1995), Inarticulate Longings: The Ladies Home Journal and the Promises of Consumer Culture, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. The Sears and Roebuck Company (1900), The Sears and Roebuck Catalogue, Fall, Chicago, IL: Sears, Roebuck, & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. The Sears and Roebuck Company (1910a), The Sears and Roebuck Catalogue, Fall, Chicago, IL: Sears, Roebuck, & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. The Sears and Roebuck Company (1910b), The Sears and Roebuck Catalogue, Spring, Chicago, IL: Sears, Roebuck, & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. The Sears and Roebuck Company (1917), The Sears and Roebuck Catalogue, Spring, Chicago, IL: Sears, Roebuck, & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. The Sears and Roebuck Company (1919), The Sears and Roebuck Catalogue, Spring, Chicago, IL: Sears, Roebuck, & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. The Sears and Roebuck Company (1923), The Sears and Roebuck Catalogue, Fall, Chicago, IL: Sears, Roebuck, & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Simmons, Karla, Istook, Cynthia and Deverajan, Priya (2004), ‘Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for apparel, part I: Describing female shapes’, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 4:1, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Sokolowski, Susan L. and Bettencourt, Chrissy (2020), Proceedings of #DBODY.TECH 2020: 11th International Conference and Exhibition of 3D Body Scanning and Processing Technologies, online/virtual conference, 17–18 November, https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/25863. Accessed 30 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Tamburrino, Nicola (1992), ‘Apparel sizing issues, part 1’, Bobbin, April, pp. 44–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Valley Dry Goods (1907), ‘Valley Dry Goods advertisement’, The Vicksburg Herald, 24 February, p. 7.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Woodson, Eleanor M. and Horridge, Patricia E. (1990), ‘Apparel sizing as it relates to women age sixty-five plus’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8:5, pp. 7–15.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00164_1
Loading
The nuances of sizing for stouts in the early twentieth century
Fashion, Style & Popular Culture 11, 103 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00164_1
/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00164_1
/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00164_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): clothing; fashion; fat; history; plus-size; ready-to-wear; standardization; women

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test