‘Scary Monsters (and Super Creeps?)’: Critiquing representations of women throughout the 1980s in Fangoria magazine

References

1. Archer, D.,, Wilson, A., and Rayson, P.. ( 2002;), ‘ Introduction to the USAS category system. ’, UCREL Semantic Analysis System (USAS), October, https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/usas_guide.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Augustinos, M.,, Walker, L., and Donaghue, N.. ( 2006), Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction, London:: Sage;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, P.. ( 2014), Using Corpora to Analyze Gender, London:: Bloomsbury;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, P.,, Gabrielatos, C.,, Khosravinik, M.,, Krzyzanowski, M.,, McEnery, T., and Wodak, R.. ( 2008;), ‘ A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. ’, Discourse and Society, 19:3, pp. 273–306.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Balun, C.. ( 1989;), ‘ Nalder’s lot. ’, Fangoria, 82, July, pp. 14–17.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brezina, V.. ( 2018;), ‘ Collocation graphs and networks: Selected applications. ’, in P. Cantos-Gómez, and M. Almela-Sánchez. (eds), Lexical Collocation Analysis, Cham:: Springer;, pp. 59–84.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brophy, P.. ( [1983] 1986;), ‘ Horrorality: The textuality of contemporary horror films. ’, Screen UK, 27:1&2, pp. 2–13.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carvalho, A.. ( 2008;), ‘ Media(ted) discourse and society: Rethinking the framework of critical discourse analysis. ’, Journalism Studies, 9:1, pp. 161–77.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Christensen, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ The final girl versus Wes Craven’s A Nightmare on Elm Street. ’, Studies in Popular Culture, 34:1, pp. 23–48.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clover, C. J.. ( 1992), Men, Women and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Darics, E., and Koller, V.. ( 2019;), ‘ Social actors “to go”: An analytical toolkit to explore agency in business discourse and communication. ’, Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 82:2, pp. 214–38.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dixon, B.. ( 1984;), ‘ Buzz. ’ (fan letter), Fangoria, 40, December, p. 8.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fairclough, N.. ( 1989), Language and Power, London:: Longman;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fairclough, N.. ( 1995), Critical Discourse Analysis, London:: Longman;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fangoria ( 2022;), ‘ About Fangoria. ’, https://www.fangoria.com/about-us/. Accessed 1 July 2022.
16. Farrimond, K.. ( 2020;), ‘ “Being a horror fan and being a feminist are often a conflicting business”: Feminist horror, the opinion economy and Teeth’s gendered audiences. ’, Horror Studies, 11:2, pp. 149–68.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Firth, J.. ( 1957), Papers in Linguistics, London:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E.. ( 1991), Social Cognition, , 2nd ed.., New York:: McGraw-Hill;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Freeland, C. A.. ( 1996;), ‘ Feminist frameworks for horror films. ’, in N. Carroll, and D. Bordwell. (eds), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, Madison, WI:: University of Wisconsin Press;, pp. 195–218.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fürsich, E.. ( 2012;), ‘ Lifestyle journalism as popular journalism: Strategies for evaluating its public role. ’, Journalism Practice, 6:1, pp. 12–25.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gabrielatos, C., and Baker, P.. ( 2008;), ‘ Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. ’, Journal of English Linguistics, 36:1, pp. 5–38.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Geeraerts, D., and Cuyckens, H.. ( 2007), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, London:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Golberg, L.. ( 1986;), ‘ Tobe Hooper: Chainsaws and invaders from Mars. ’, Fangoria, 55, July, pp. 34–37.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Halliday, M. A. K.. ( 1994), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London:: Edward Arnold;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. ( 2014), Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, , 4th ed.., Abingdon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Harrington, E.. ( 2018), Women, Monstrosity and Horror Film: Gynaehorror, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hart, C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Argumentation meets adapted cognition: Manipulation in media discourse on cognition. ’, Journal of Pragmatics, 59:B, pp. 200–09.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hasan, R.. ( 1989), Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kendrick, J.. ( 2009;), ‘ Razors in the dreamscape: Revisiting “A Nightmare on Elm Street” and the slasher film. ’, Film Criticism, 33:3, pp. 17–33.
    [Google Scholar]
30. King, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ A regiment of monstrous women: Female horror archetypes and life history theory. ’, Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9:3, pp. 170–85.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Koller, V.. ( 2012;), ‘ How to analyse collective identity in discourse: Textual and contextual parameters. ’, Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 5:2, pp. 19–38.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Markovitz, J.. ( 2000;), ‘ Female paranoia as survival skill: Reason or pathology in A Nightmare on Elm Street. ’, Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 17:3, pp. 211–20.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Martin, B.. ( 1981;), ‘ Jamie Lee Curtis: In her final encounter – only this time, the maniac is carrying a tape recorder!. ’, Fangoria, 15, October, pp. 20–25.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Matthiessen, C., and Halliday, M. A. K.. ( 2009), Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory, Beijing:: Higher Education Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McClain, J. M., and Lascity, M. E.. ( 2020;), ‘ Toward the study of framing found in music journalism. ’, Popular Music and Society, 43:1, pp. 20–33.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Moscovici, S., and Duveen, G.. ( 2000), Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology, New York:: New York University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Murnen, S. K., and Byrne, D.. ( 1991;), ‘ Hyperfemininity: Measurement and initial validation of the construct. ’, Journal of Sex Research, 28:3, pp. 479–89.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nowell, R.. ( 2014;), ‘ “A kind of Bacall quality”: Jamie Lee Curtis, stardom and gentrifying non-Hollywood horror. ’, in R. Nowell. (ed.), Merchants of Menace: The Business of Horror Cinema, New York:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 129–46.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nutman, P.. ( 1988;), ‘ Jennifer Rubin dreams again. ’, Fangoria, 73, May, pp. 45–47.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pisters, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Carrie’s sisters: New blood in contemporary female horror cinema. ’, in N. Chare,, J. Hoorn, and A. Yue. (eds), Re-Reading the Monstrous-Feminine: Art, Film, Feminism and Psychoanalysis, New York:: Routledg;e, pp. 121–38.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Platts, T. K.. ( 2015;), ‘ The new horror movie. ’, in B. Cogan, and T. Gencarelli. (eds), Baby Boomers and Popular Culture: An Inquiry into America’s Most Powerful Generation, Santa Barbara, CA:: Praeger;, pp. 147–64.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Rabkin, W.. ( 1986;), ‘ The monstrous makeup FX of A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge. ’, Fangoria, 52, March, pp. 26–29.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Samuel, P.. ( 2011;), ‘ Heather Langenkamp (Part 2). ’, Static Mass Emporium: The Essence of Film, 8 August, http://staticmass.net/exclusive-interviews/exclusive-interview-with-heather-langenkamp-part-2/. Accessed 1 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Trencansky, S.. ( 2001;), ‘ Final girls and terrible youth: Transgression in 1980s slasher horror. ’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 29:2, pp. 63–73.
    [Google Scholar]
45. van Dijk, T. A.. ( 1993;), ‘ Principles of critical discourse analysis. ’, Discourse & Society, 4:2, pp. 249–83.
    [Google Scholar]
46. van Dijk, T. A.. ( 1995;), ‘ Aims of critical discourse analysis. ’, Japanese Discourse, 1:1, pp. 17–27.
    [Google Scholar]
47. van Dijk, T. A.. ( 2009;), ‘ Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. ’, in R. Wodak, and M. Meyer. (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, , 2nd ed.., London:: Sage;, pp. 62–86.
    [Google Scholar]
48. van Dijk, T. A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. ’, in R. Wodak, and M. Meyer. (eds), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, London:: Sage;, pp. 62–85.
    [Google Scholar]
49. van Leeuwen, T.. ( 1996;), ‘ The representation of social actors. ’, in C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, and M. Coulthard. (eds), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 32–70.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wales, K.. ( 1996), Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Warren, B.. ( 1988;), ‘ Not of this earth: Take two. ’, Fangoria, 75, July, pp. 14–17, 66.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Webster, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ “I wanna be a toy”: Self-sexualisation in gender-variant Twitter users’ biographies. ’, Journal of Language and Sexuality, 7:2, pp. 205–36.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Webster, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ “I am I”: Self-constructed transgender identities in internet-mediated forum communication. ’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019:256, pp. 129–46.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Webster, L.. ( 2021;), ‘ “Erase/rewind”: How transgender Twitter discourses challenge and (re)politicise lesbian identities. ’, Journal of Lesbian Studies, 26:2, pp. 174–91.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Wooley, J.. ( 1985;), ‘ Nightmare: After A Nightmare on Elm Street, star Heather Langenkamp is now being touted as the successor to Jamie Lee Curtis. ’, Fangoria, 45, June, pp. 10–12.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Webster, Lexi. ( 2022;), ‘ “Scary Monsters (and Super Creeps?)”: Critiquing representations of women throughout the 1980s in Fangoria magazine. ’, Horror Studies, 13:2, pp. 209–29, https://doi.org/10.1386/host_00055_1
    [Google Scholar]