Fumbling towards community-engaged opera creation: A reflexive dialogue | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1752-6299
  • E-ISSN: 1752-6302

Abstract

This article analyses reflections of two years of an opera creation project that integrated professional artists with community participants. The authors, who were involved as artists in the project, explore one line of inquiry guiding the larger project: can the perceived exclusive, high-cultured opera medium welcome amateur performers successfully? What is the nature of the collaboration? The authors integrated critical discourse studies (CDS) with arts-informed research practices to inform methodology. The analysis is presented as a scripted dialogue, focusing on three interconnected themes: the relationship of opera to community music; tensions of inclusivity in a creative project occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic; and considering creative and decision-making processes in co-creation. We examine how our experiences were organized though language and connected to discourses of inclusivity and excellence in community music.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Award #435-2020-1157)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ijcm_00087_1
2024-02-05
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArtWorks Cymru (2015), Quality Principles Booklet, Cardiff: ArtWorks Cymru, https://artworks.cymru/uploads/documents/frameworkDownloads/QualityPrinciples-Booklet-v7-ENGLISH.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, G. (2021), Rethinking Social Action through Music: The Search for Coexistence and Citizenship in Medellín’s Music Schools, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartleet, B.-L. (2009), ‘Sound links: Exploring the social, cultural and educational dynamics of musical communities in Australia’, International Journal of Community Music, 1:3, pp. 33556, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm.1.3.335_1. Accessed 15 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartleet, B.-L. and Higgins, L. (2018), ‘Introduction: An overview of community music in the twenty-first century’, in B.-L. Bartleet and L. Higgins (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Community Music, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bau Graves, J. (2018), ‘Why public culture fails at diversity’, in B.-L. Bartleet and L. Higgins (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Community Music, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 42148.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bjørnsen, E. and Woddis, J. (2020), ‘Music in our lives: Using the concept of “Bildung” to understand the role of music education policy in England’, Research Studies in Music Education, 42:2, pp. 192207, https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X19841918. Accessed 24 August 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boeskov, K. (2019), ‘Music and social transformation: Exploring ambiguous musical practice in a Palestinian refugee camp’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo: Norges musikkhøgskole.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bush, J. and Krikun, A. (2013), ‘Community music in North America: Historical foundations’, in D. Elliott, S. Messenger, M. Silverman and K. Veblen (eds), Community Music Today, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education, pp. 1314.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Camlin, D., Caulfield, L. and Perkins, R. (2020), ‘Capturing the magic: A three-way dialogue on the impact of music on people and society’, International Journal of Community Music, 13:2, pp. 15772, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00017_1. Accessed 18 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Caton, K. (2022), ‘Participatory opera: Performing and creating audiences’, Ph.D. thesis, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Clements, J. (2016), ‘Opera as a community arts project: Strategies for engagement and participation’, The International Journal of Social, Political, and Community Agendas in the Arts, 11:1, pp. 5768, https://doi.org/10.18848/2326-9960/CGP/57-68. Accessed 30 August 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clift, S. (2021), ‘Editorial’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 12528, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00041_2. Accessed 30 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Concordia Department of Music (2021), ‘Personal pandemic: A socially distanced opera’, YouTube, 28 June, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av0nOz6GPe4. Accessed 22 September 2022.
  14. Concordia Department of Music (2022), ‘Why do we dream? A lucid dream opera by RISE and CLOrk’, YouTube, 25 April, https://youtu.be/2rfVF1Ixjgg?si=NT0e7PmLPir7l75z. Accessed 28 May 2022.
  15. Creech, A. (2014), ‘Community opera in a centre of excellence: An instrumental case study’, in L. O’Farrell, S. Schonmann and E. Wagner (eds), International Yearbook for Research in Arts Education 2/2014, Münster: Waxmann Verlag, pp. 200202.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Crooke, A., Hara, M., Davidson, J., Fraser, T. and DeNora, T. (2021), ‘Fractured bonds and crystal capital: Social capital among COVID-era music communities’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2&3, pp. 24772, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00047_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cunliffe, A. (2016), ‘“On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner” redux: What does it mean to be reflexive?’, Journal of Management Education, 40:6, pp. 74046, https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916668919. Accessed 30 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Deane, K. (2018), ‘Community music in the United Kingdom: Politics or policies?’, in B.-L. Bartleet and L. Higgins (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Community Music, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32342.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Deane, K. and Mullen, P. (2013), ‘Community music in the United Kingdom’, in K. Veblen, S. Messenger, M. Silverman and D. Elliott (eds), Community Music Today, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education, pp. 2540.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dullea, R. (2017), ‘Engagement, participation, and situated learning in a children’s opera chorus program’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 65:1, pp. 7294, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417695751. Accessed 30 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Evrard, Y. (1997), ‘Democratizing culture or cultural democracy?’, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 27:3, pp. 16775, https://doi.org/10.1080/10632929709596961. Accessed 30 August 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Harries, G. (2020), ‘Opera, devising and community: A creative and pedagogical methodology’, International Journal of Community Music, 13:3, pp. 27182, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00027_1. Accessed 30 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Helms, J. (2015), Everybody In? Critical Perspectives on Participatory Online Classical Music Projects, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Henley, J. and Higgins, L. (2020), ‘Redefining excellence and inclusion’, International Journal of Community Music, 13:2, pp. 20716, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00020_1. Accessed 10 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Higgins, L. (2012), Community Music: In Theory and in Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Higgins, L. and Willingham, L. (2017), Engaging in Community Music: An Introduction, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Howell, G., Higgins, L. and Bartleet, B.-L. (2017), ‘Community music practice: Intervention through facilitation’, in R. Mantie and G. D. Smith (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Music Making and Leisure, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60118.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Irwin, R. L., LeBlanc, N., Ryu, J. Y. and Belliveau, G. (2017), ‘A/r/tography as living inquiry’, in P. Leavy (ed.), Handbook of Arts-Based Research, New York: Guilford Publications, pp. 3753.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jaber, H., Garry, F. and Phelan, H. (2021), ‘“We are all facing the same problem”: Lived experiences of online participation in the Irish World Music Café community music initiative in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2, pp. 27393, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00048_1. Accessed 16 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Leavy, P. (2017), ‘Introduction to arts-based research’, in P. Leavy (ed.), Handbook of Arts-Based Research, New York: Guilford Publications, pp. 321.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mallett, A. (2019), ‘Company voice: A collaborative approach to the evaluation of a participatory arts project’, Social Value of Music Conference, London, UK, 2–3 December.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mantie, R. (2018), ‘Community music and rational recreation’, in B.-L. Bartleet and L. Higgins (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Community Music, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 54354.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Matarasso, F. (2019), A Restless Art: How Participation Won, and Why It Matters, Strasbourg: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Matarasso, F. and Landry, C. (1999), Balancing Act: Twenty-one Strategic Dilemmas in Cultural Policy, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D. and Joseph, G. O. (2005), ‘Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature’, Review of Educational Research, 75:3, pp. 365416, https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003365. Accessed 18 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Röggla, T., Striner, A., Rivas Pagador, H. and Cesar, P. (2022), ‘The co-creation space: An online safe space for community opera creation’, in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, IMX ’22, New York, USA, 22–24 June, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 22932, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3505284.3532814. Accessed 22 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rudland, O. (2021), ‘How a community told its story through opera: Exploring the techniques and methods in a co-created production’, Sounding Board (Journal of Community Music), 1, pp. 47, https://www.academia.edu/50199231/How_a_community_told_its_story_through_opera_exploring_the_techniques_and_methods_in_a_co_created_production. Accessed 8 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Springgay, S., Irwin, R. and Kind, S. (2005), ‘A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text’, Qualitative Inquiry, 11:6, pp. 897912, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405280696. Accessed 20 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Talbert, M. and Edelman, P. (2021), ‘COVID-19 and community band participation: Impacts and the road forward’, International Journal of Community Music, 14:2&3, pp. 191203, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm_00044_1. Accessed 20 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Turner, K. (2021), ‘Words of choice: Challenging a discourse of disadvantage and social change in community music’, in L. Willingham (ed.), Community Music at the Boundaries, Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp. 2645.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Vaugeois, L. (2013), ‘Colonization and the institutionalization of hierarchies of the human through music education: Studies in the education of feeling’, Ph.D. dissertation, Toronto: University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Veblen, K. (2008), ‘The many ways of community music’, International Journal of Community Music, 1:1, pp. 521, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm.1.1.5/1. Accessed 10 January 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wodak, R. (1999), ‘Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century’, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32:1, pp. 18593, https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683622. Accessed 23 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Wodak, R. (2001), ‘What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments’, in M. Meyer and R. Wodak (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage Publications, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds) (2016), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed., New York: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Yerichuk, D. and Krar, J. (2021), ‘The problem of community: What does it really mean to be inclusive?’, in L. Willingham (ed.), Community Music at the Boundaries, Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp. 725.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ijcm_00087_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error