Publishing in the International Journal of Music in Early Childhood: Key processes and considerations

References

1. Assis, A. J. B. D. de, Holanda, C. A. and Amorim, R. F. B. D. (2019), ‘A new side of an old problem: Self-plagiarism in scientific publications’, Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging, 13:2, https://www.doi.org/10.5327/Z2447-211520191800063.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cajigas, B. Z. L., Gonzáles, J. L. A., Japura, G. A., Sota, C. Q., Tarazona, J. O. G., Muñoz, G. I. S. and Chuyma, R. C. (2022), ‘Self-plagiarism: Reasons and motivations for academic plagiarism or text recycling’, Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6:2, pp. 1697–711.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Committee on Publication Ethics (2022), ‘Text recycling guidelines’, COPE, https://publicationethics.org/text-recycling-guidelines. Accessed 17 February 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Elwick, S., Bradley, B. and Sumsion, J. (2014), ‘Infants as others: Uncertainties, difficulties and (im)possibilities in researching infants’ lives’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27:2, pp. 196–213.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Graham, A., Powell, M. A. and Truscott, J. (2016), ‘Exploring the nexus between participatory methods and ethics in early childhood research’, Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41:1, pp. 82–89.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Green, R. (2009), ‘American and Australian doctoral literature reviewing practices and pedagogies’, Ph.D. thesis, Melbourne: Deakin University.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jalongo, M. R. and Saracho, O. N. (2016), Writing for Publication, Cham: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kamler, B. (2008), ‘Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis’, Studies in Higher Education, 33:3, pp. 283–94.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kornhaber, R., Cross, M., Betihavas, V. and Bridgman, H. (2016), ‘The benefits and challenges of academic writing retreats: An integrative review’, Higher Education Research & Development, 35:6, pp. 1210–27.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kwan, B. S. C. (2013), ‘Facilitating novice researchers in project publishing during the doctoral years and beyond: A Hong Kong-based study’, Studies in Higher Education, 38:2, pp. 207–25.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lee, A. and Kamler, B. (2008), ‘Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13:5, pp. 511–23.
    [Google Scholar]
12. MacLeod, I., Steckley, L. and Murray, R. (2012), ‘Time is not enough: Promoting strategic engagement with writing for publication’, Studies in Higher Education, 37:6, pp. 641–54.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Murray, R. (2013), Writing for Academic Journals, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Pickering, C. and Byrne, J. (2014), ‘The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers’, Higher Education Research & Development, 33:3, pp. 534–48.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Pickering, C., Grignon, J., Steven, R., Guitart, D. and Byrne, J. (2015), ‘Publishing not perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews’, Studies in Higher Education, 40:10, pp. 1756–69, https://doi-org.ezproxy.bu.edu/10.1080/03075079.2014.914907.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Velterop, J. (2015), ‘Peer review: Issues, limitations, and future development’, ScienceOpen Research, https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AYXIPS.v1. Accessed 19 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Wolfenden, H., Sercombe, H. and Tucker, P. (2019), ‘Making practice publishable: What practice academics need to do to get their work published, and what that tells us about the theory-practice gap’, Social Epistemology, 33:6, pp. 555–73.
    [Google Scholar]