Navigating ‘modernization’ in craft: Artisan-designers in Gujarat, India | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Decolonizing Fashion as Process
  • ISSN: 2051-7106
  • E-ISSN: 2051-7114

Abstract

Discourses on traditional textile and craft practices, focusing on participatory and emancipatory approaches, disregard epistemologies and ontologies other than that of the researcher and invest in reformation, through new technology and modernization, of traditional practices. While these mainstream narratives have ignored the presence of non-western realities, this article takes the example of Somaiya Kala Vidya, a design institute based in Kutch, India, that provides traditional textile artisans with design education for capability-building, enabling sustenance in the current fashion paradigm: a product of systematic erasure of local systems by the West. Artisans exposed to design education display unique creative identities alongside their collective cultural identities. They challenge fashion hegemonies by navigating the tensions between ‘perceived’ local and global, modernity and tradition. The study brings forth the complexity of modernization processes; a by-product of design education, resulting in the deconstruction and reconstruction of traditional knowledge in the community. This examination of creative identities, aspirations and traditional knowledge of artisans demonstrates the need of decolonizing the fashion industry’s approach to the craft ecosystem, contributing to an essential discussion of pluralistic realities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00073_1
2022-10-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Balaram, S.. ( 2005;), ‘ Design pedagogy in India: A perspective. ’, Design Issues, 21:4, pp. 1122.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beiner, G.. ( 2007), Remembering the Year of the French: Irish Folk History and Social Memory, Madison, WI:: University of Wisconsin Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatt, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Mahatma Gandhi and the model of fashion education, activism and system(s) in India. ’, Clothing Cultures, 5:1, pp. 17782.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlone, H. B.,, Scott, C., and Lowder, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. ’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51:7, pp. 83669.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chatterjee, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ We must revive the villages. ’, Garland Magazine, 7 May, https://bit.ly/3Den1cQ. Accessed 11 November 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Curtis, F.. ( 2003;), ‘ Eco-localism and sustainability. ’, Ecological Economics, 46:1, pp. 83102.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dineen, R., and Collins, E.. ( 2005;), ‘ Killing the goose: Conflicts between pedagogy and politics in the delivery of a creative education. ’, The International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24:1, pp. 4352.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldman, D. H.. ( 1974;), ‘ Universal to unique: A developmental view of creativity and education. ’, in S. Rosner, and L. E. Abt. (eds), Essays in Creativity, Croton-on-Hudson, NY:: North River Press;, pp. 4585.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Frater, J.. ( 2019a;), ‘ Education for artisans: Beginning a sustainable future for craft traditions. ’, in A. Mignosa, and P. Kotipalli. (eds), A Cultural Economic Analysis of Craft, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 27184.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Frater, J.. ( 2019b;), in-person interview with M. Chauhan. , Kutch, Gujarat:, 1 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Frater, J., and Hawley, J. M.. ( 2018;), ‘ A hand-crafted slow revolution: Co-designing a new genre in the luxury world. ’, Fashion, Style & Popular Culture, 5:3, pp. 299311.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gaudelli, W.. ( 2020;), ‘ The trouble of western education. ’, Journal for Research and Debate, 3:7, https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.7.8. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghose, R.. ( 1989;), ‘ Design, development, culture, and cultural legacies in Asia. ’, Design Issues, 6: 1, pp. 3148.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Glăveanu, V. P.. ( 2010;), ‘ Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. ’, New Ideas in Psychology, 28:1, pp. 7993.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Greru, C., and Kalkreuter, B.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design and the evolving tradition of Sanganer hand block printing: Formation and negotiation of artisanal knowledge and identities against the backdrop of intangible cultural heritage. ’, The Journal of Modern Craft, 10:2, pp. 13756.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haynes, D. E.. ( 2000;), ‘ Just like a family? Recalling the relations of production in the textile industries of Surat and Bhiwandi, 1940–60. ’, in J. P. Parry,, J. Breman, and K. Kapadia. (eds), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour, London:: Sage;, pp. 14169.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hughes, P.. ( 2012;), ‘ Towards a post-consumer subjectivity: A future for the crafts in the twenty first century?. ’, craft + design enquiry, 3, pp. 718.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kälviäinen, M.. ( 2000;), ‘ The significance of “craft” qualities in creating experiential design products. ’, The Design Journal, 3:3, pp. 415.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Khatri, I. M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Oral history by Dr Ismail Mohammed Khatri. ’, University of Warwick;, 15 February, https://bit.ly/3OPShRM. Accessed 20 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Khatri, I. M.. ( 2019a;), in-person interview with M. Chauhan. , Kutch, Gujarat:, 2 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Khatri, J.. ( 2019b;), in-person interview with M. Chauhan. , Kutch, Gujarat:, 2 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Khatri, K. U.. ( 2019c;), in-person interview with M. Chauhan. , Kutch, Gujarat:, 2 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kohn, M., and Reddy, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Colonialism. ’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://stanford.io/3OKXFpt. Accessed 27 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lave, J.. ( 1991;), ‘ Situating learning in communities of practice. ’, in L. B. Resnick,, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley. (eds), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC:: American Psychological Association;, pp. 6382.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mamidipudi, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Constructing common knowledge: Design practice for social change in craft livelihoods in India. ’, Design Issues, 34:4, pp. 3750.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mamidipudi, A., and Gajjala, R.. ( 2008;), ‘ Juxtaposing handloom weaving and modernity: Building theory through praxis. ’, Development in Practice, 18:2, pp. 23544.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mamidipudi, A.,, Syamasundari, B., and Bijker, W.. ( 2012;), ‘ Mobilising discourses: Handloom as sustainable socio-technology. ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 47:25, pp. 4151.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mathur, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ Charles and Ray Eames in India. ’, Art Journal, 70:1, pp. 3453.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McGowan, A.. ( 2009), Crafting the Nation in Colonial India, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Negus, K., and Pickering, M.. ( 2004), Creativity, Communication, and Cultural Value, London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Prihutomo, A., and Paramita, R.. ( 2020;), ‘ Collaborative fashion project with the artisan: Changing tradition into contemporary design. ’, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium of Arts, Crafts & Design in Southeast Asia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 5 November.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Prime, N., and Delcourt-Itonaga, M.. ( 2010;), ‘ The taste of industrialised societies for traditional products: Socio-cultural and economic paradoxes. ’, in E. Milliot, and N. Tournois. (eds), Paradoxes of Globalisation, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 99118.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Puusa, A., and Eerikäinen, M.. ( 2010;), ‘ Is tacit knowledge really tacit?. ’, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8:3, pp. 30718.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rao M.,, Jain, R., and Thakkar, J.. ( 2018), Community Driven Innovation Project with the Craft Community of Gundiyali, Ahmedabad:: CEPT University;, https://bit.ly/3QDXGNN. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Scrase, T. J.. ( 2003;), ‘ Precarious production: Globalisation and artisan labour in the third world. ’, Third World Quarterly, 24:3, pp. 44961.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Siju, P. R.. ( 2019;), in-person interview with M. Chauhan. , Kutch, Gujarat:, 3 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Somaiya Kala Vidya. ( 2019;), ‘ Ramesh’s collection. ’, Instagram , 10 October, https://bit.ly/3A7sVL9. Accessed 18 August 2021.
  38. Somaiya Kala Vidya. ( 2020;), ‘ Education for artisans. ’, https://bit.ly/3y3rkDs. Accessed 10 December 2020.
  39. Tung, F. W.. ( 2012;), ‘ Weaving with rush: Exploring craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. ’, International Journal of Design, 6:3, pp. 7184.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. van Lieshout, M.,, Bijker, W. E., and Egyedi, T. M.. ( 2001), Social Learning Technologies: The Introduction of Multimedia in Education, Aldershot:, Ashgate;.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Vázquez, R.. ( 2010;), ‘ Modernity, the greatest show on earth: Thoughts on visibility. ’, Borderlands , https://bit.ly/3HMTPty. Accessed 23 June 2022.
  42. Weiner, R. P.. ( 2000), Creativity and Beyond: Cultures, Values, and Change, Albany, NY:: State University of New York Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Woldegiorgis, E. T.. ( 2020;), ‘ Decolonising a higher education system which has never been colonised. ’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53:9, pp. 894906.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Chauhan, Megha. ( 2022;), ‘ Navigating “modernization” in craft: Artisan-designers in Gujarat, India. ’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9:2, pp. 299316, https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00073_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00073_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/infs_00073_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error