Skip to content
1981
Childhoods in Transition: Mediating “In-Between Spaces”
  • ISSN: 1757-2681
  • E-ISSN: 1757-269X

Abstract

This article explores the use of digital images as part of the adoption process. Based on a series of semi-structured interviews with adoptive parents, social workers and foster carers, it explores the responses of these stakeholders and reflects on the value and effect of digital images as they are employed when a child is placed for adoption. The research reveals how the kinds of information ‘moving images’ can offer become significant, not just as introductory material for potential adoptive parents – operating within the in-between space for the parent waiting to adopt and the child waiting to be placed – but as facilitating a virtual, present-tense dialogue (in-between adopters, foster carers and the child) once a placement has been agreed. Another unanticipated revelation was the extent to which clips were valued beyond their instrumental use in these in-between spaces and resonated within the future life narrative of the adopted child.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • University of Glasgow
  • Big Lottery Awards for All Scotland
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00027_1
2020-12-01
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adoption and Fostering Alliance Scotland ( 2018), Using Video Clips in Finding Adoptive Families for Children: A Practice Guide, Edinburgh:: AFA Scotland;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John Langshaw. ( [1955] 2011), How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bletchly, Rachael. ( 2017;), ‘ Alfie, 6, finds his “forever” family as he reveals he’s found a loving home a year after featuring in adoption campaign. ’, Mirror , 15 October, https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/alfie-6-finds-forever-family-11348362?ICI=FB_mirror_vid. Accessed 3 October 2019.
  4. Boswell, Sophie, and Cudmore, Lynne. ( 2014;), ‘ “The children were fine”: acknowledging complex feelings in the move from foster care into adoption. ’, Adoption & Fostering, 38:1, pp. 521.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brodzinsky, David M.,, Schechter, Marshall, and Henig, Robin Marantz. ( 1993), Being Adopted: The Lifelong Search for Self, New York:: Anchor;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brookfield, Helen,, Brown, Steven D., and Reavey, Paula. ( 2008;), ‘ Vicarious and post‐memory practices in adopting families: The re‐production of the past through photography and narrative. ’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18:5, pp. 47491.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler, Judith. ( 1988;), ‘ Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. ’, Theatre Journal, 40:4, pp. 51931.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Caron, E. B.,, Weston-Lee, Patria,, Haggerty, Danielle, and Dozier, Mary. ( 2016;), ‘ Community implementation outcomes of attachment and biobehavioral catch-up. ’, Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, pp. 12837.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chou, Shihning,, Browne, Kevin, and Kirkaldy, Melanie. ( 2007;), ‘ Intercountry adoption on the internet. ’, Adoption & Fostering, 31:2, pp. 2231.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cousins, Jennifer. ( 2003;), ‘ Are we missing the match?: Rethinking adopter assessment and child profiling. ’, Adoption & Fostering, 27:4, pp. 718.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dibben, Elaine. ( 2018;), ‘ Adoption: Knowledge and practice hub. ’, Community Care Inform Children, 28 February, https://www.ccinform.co.uk/knowledge-hubs/adoption-knowledge-and-practice-hub/. Accessed 3 October 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Doughty, Julie,, Meakings, Sarah, and Shelton, Katherine. ( 2019;), ‘ Rights and relationships of children who are adopted from care. ’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 33:1, pp. 123.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Floersch, Jerry,, Longhofer, Jeffrey L.,, Kranke, Derrick, and Townsend, Lisa. ( 2010;), ‘ Integrating thematic, grounded theory and narrative analysis: A case study of adolescent psychotropic treatment. ’, Qualitative Social Work, 9:3, pp. 40725.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giles, David C.. ( 2002;), ‘ Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. ’, Media Psychology, 4:3, pp. 279305.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Grant, Margaret. ( 2011), Seeing the Difference? Using Video Profiling in Family Finding, London:: BAAF;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grant, Margaret,, Whincup, Helen, and Burgess, Cheryl. ( 2019), Perspectives on Kinship Care, Foster Care and Adoption: The Voices of Children, Carers and Adoptive Parents, Research Report for the Study ‘Permanently Progressing? Building Secure Futures for Children in Scotland’, Stirling:: University of Stirling;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gupta, Anna, and Featherstone, Brid. ( 2019;), ‘ On hope, loss, anger, and the spaces in between: Reflections on living with/in adoption and the role of the social worker. ’, Child & Family Social Work, 25:1, pp. 16572.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hammond, Simon, and Cooper, Neil. ( 2013), Digital Life Story Work: Using Technology to Help Young People Make Sense of Their Experiences, London:: BAAF;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hardy, Ruth. ( 2017;), ‘ Adoption family finding: Tips for writing a child’s profile. ’, Community Care, 11 December, https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2017/12/11/adoption-family-finding-tips-writing-childs-profile/. Accessed 3 October 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Horton, Donald, and Wohl, R. Richard. ( 1956;), ‘ Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. ’, Psychiatry, 19:3, pp. 21529.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Howard, Jeanne. ( 2012), Untangling the Web: The Internet’s Transformative Impact on Adoption, New York:: Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute;, https://njarch.org/wpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/UntanglingtheWeb21.pdf. Accessed 11 December 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson, Dana. ( 2019), Adoption Advocate No 131: The Role of Pre-Placement Medical Review in Contemporary Adoptions: Setting Expectations, Assessing a Child’s Needs, and Supporting Successful Family Formation, Alexandria, VA:: National Council for Adoption;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kavka, Misha, and West, Amy. ( 2004;), ‘ Temporalities of the real: Conceptualising time in reality TV. ’, in S. Holmes, and D. Jermyn. (eds), Understanding Reality Television, London:: Routledge;, pp. 13654.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirk, H. David. ( 1964), Shared Fate: A Theory of Adoption and Mental Health, London and New York:: Collier-Macmillan and The Free Press of Glenco;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Marriott, Stephanie. ( 2007), Live Television: Time, Space and the Broadcast Event, London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McWhinnie, Alexina M.. ( 1967), Adopted Children: How They Grow Up, London:: Routledge & Kegan Paul;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Neil, Elsbeth,, Beek, Mary, and Ward, Emma. ( 2015), Contact After Adoption: A Longitudinal Study of Post Adoption Contact Arrangements, London:: CoramBAAF;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nichols, Bill. ( 1992), Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary, Indianapolis, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Quinton, David. ( 2012), Rethinking Matching in Adoptions from Care: A Conceptual and Research Overview, London:: BAAF;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rasmussen, Leslie. ( 2018;), ‘ Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities. ’, The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7:1, pp. 28094.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Riessman, Catherine Kohler. ( 2008), Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications, Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Samuels, Julia. ( 2018), Adoption in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges for the 21st Century, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Silverstone, Roger. ( 1994), Television and Everyday Life, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Triseliotis, John. ( 1973), In Search of Origins: The Experiences of Adopted People, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Triseliotis, John,, Feast, Julia, and Kyle, Fiona. ( 2005), The Adoption Triangle Revisited, London:: BAAF;.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Grant, Maggie, and Lury, Karen. ( 2020;), ‘ In-between and beyond: Moving images and finding families – Using digital media in the adoption process. ’, Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 11:3, pp. 307324, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc_00027_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00027_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error