Skip to content
1981
Childhoods in Transition: Mediating “In-Between Spaces”
  • ISSN: 1757-2681
  • E-ISSN: 1757-269X

Abstract

The move from adolescence to adulthood is a pivotal transitional period rife with cultural, social and personal changes. It also involves an era of in-between moments: rather than a sudden change, teenagers spend years navigating the grey areas between adolescence and adulthood. This transition has been further complicated by the use of digital technologies (DTs) and computer-mediated communication (CMC) shaping teenagers’ experiences during this period. By utilizing UK communication regulator Ofcom’s Adults’ Media Lives dataset, this study longitudinally studies the same teenagers between 2006 and 2018. It observes how they are both aided and hindered by the use of DT and CMC over time, identifying three key aspects of their lives that are shaped during this transition – relationships with their parents, their friends and their move from school to work – as they strive for independence, agency and individuality.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • University of Nottingham and Ofcom (Award Project 1805200)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00028_1
2020-12-01
2024-10-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baym, Nancy. ( 2010), Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Cambridge:: Polity;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. boyd, danah. ( 2006;), ‘ Friends, friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. ’, First Monday, 11:12, n.pag., https://firstmonday.org/article/view/1418/1336. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. boyd, danah. ( 2007;), ‘ Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. ’, in D. Buckingham. (ed.), Youth, Identity and Digital Media, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 119142.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. boyd, danah. ( 2014), It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. boyd, danah, and Donath, Judith. ( 2004;), ‘ Public displays of connection. ’, BT Technology Journal, 22:4, pp. 7182, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chambers, Deborah. ( 2013), Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Daly, Kerry. ( 2007), Qualitative Methods for Family Studies & Human Development, Los Angeles:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deacon, David, and Stanyer, James. ( 2014;), ‘ Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon?. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 36:7, pp. 103244, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163443714542218. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Elsaesser, Caitlin,, Russell, Beth,, Ohannessian, Christine, and Patton, Desmond. ( 2017;), ‘ Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. ’, Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 35, pp. 6272, https://safelab.socialwork.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/1-s2.0-S1359178917301878-main.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffman, Erving. ( 1969), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London:: Allen Lane;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Graber, Julia,, Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne, and Petersen, Anne. (eds) ( 1996), Transitions through Adolescence: Interpersonal Domains and Context, Hillsdale, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guest, Greg,, Macqueen, Kathleen, and Namey, Emily. ( 2012), Applied Thematic Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hepp, Andreas,, Hjarvard, Stig, and Lundby, Knut. ( 2015;), ‘ Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 37:2, pp. 31424, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163443715573835. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hines, Alice. ( 1997;), ‘ Divorce-related transitions, adolescent development, and the role of the parent–child relationship: A review of the literature. ’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 59:2, pp. 37588, https://www.jstor.org/stable/353477?seq=1. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jarvis, Jeff. ( 2011), Public Parts: How Sharing in the Digital Age Improves the Way We Work and Live, New York:: Simon & Schuster;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambert, Alexander. ( 2013), Intimacy and Friendship on Facebook, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lanier, Jaron. ( 2010), You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto, New York:: Alfred A. Knopf;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Larson, Reed,, Moneta, Giovanni,, Richards, Maryse, and Wilson, Suzanne. ( 2002;), ‘ Continuity, stability and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. ’, Child Development, 73:4, pp. 115165, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3696277?seq=1. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Leventhal, Tama,, Graber, Julia, and Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne. ( 2001;), ‘ Adolescent transitions to young adulthood: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences of adolescent employment. ’, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11:3, pp. 297323, https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-18812-004. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lievrouw, Leah, and Livingstone, Sonia. ( 2006), Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Livingstone, Sonia,, Bober, Magdalena, and Helsper, Ellen. ( 2005), Internet Literacy among Children and Young People: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project, London:: LSE Research Online;, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/397. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Livingstone, Sonia, and Byrne, Jasmina. ( 2018;), ‘ Parenting in the digital age. The challenges of parental responsibility in comparative perspective. ’, in G. Mascheroni,, C. Ponte, and A. Jorge. (eds), Digital Parenting: The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age, Göteborg:: Nordicom;, pp. 1930.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Livingstone, Sonia, and Sefton-Green, Julian. ( 2016), The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age (Connected Youth and Digital Futures), New York:: NYU Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lundby, Knut. (ed.) ( 2014), Mediatization of Communication, Mouton:: De Gruyter;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meikle, Graham. ( 2016), Social Media: Communication, Sharing and Visibility, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mendelson, Andrew, and Papacharissi, Zizi. ( 2010;), ‘ Look at us: Collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries. ’, in Z. Papacharissi. (ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, Oxford:: Routledge;, pp. 25173.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nesi, Jacqueline, and Prinstein, Mitchell. ( 2019;), ‘ In search of likes: Longitudinal associations between adolescents’ digital status seeking and health-risk behaviours. ’, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48:5, pp. 74048, https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2018.1437733. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Notley, Tanya. ( 2009;), ‘ Young people, online networks, and social inclusion. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14:4, pp. 120827, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01487.x. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ofcom ( 2006), Media Literacy Audit: Report on Adult Media Literacy, London:: Ofcom;, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/adults/medialit_audit. Accessed 3 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ofcom ( 2009), UK Adults Media Literacy: 2009 Interim Report, London:: Ofcom;, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/adults. Accessed 3 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ofcom ( 2019), Adults’ Media Use and Attitudes Report 2019, London:: Ofcom;, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/adults/adults-media-use-and-attitudes. Accessed 26 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Petersen, Anne. ( 1988;), ‘ Adolescent development. ’, Annual Review of Psychology, 39:1, pp. 583607, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.003055. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pitcan, Mikaela,, Marwick, Alice, and boyd, danah. ( 2018;), ‘ Performing a vanilla self: Respectability politics, social class, and the digital world. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23:3, pp. 16379, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy008. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Quan-Haase, Anabel. ( 2015), Technology and Society: Social Networks, Power, and Inequality, Don Mills, ON:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rainie, Lee, and Wellman, Barry. ( 2012), Networked: The New Social Operating System, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rosen, Christine. ( 2007;), ‘ Virtual friendship and the new narcissism. ’, The New Atlantis – A Journal of Technology & Society, 17, pp. 1531, https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/virtual-friendship-and-the-new-narcissism. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Smetana, Judith,, Campione-Barr, Nicole, and Metzger, Aaron. ( 2006;) ‘ Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. ’, Annual Review of Psychology, 57:1, pp. 25584, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7449567_Adolescent_Development_in_Interpersonal_and_Societal_Contexts. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Steinberg, Laurence, and Morris, Amanda. ( 2001;), ‘ Adolescent development. ’, Annual Review of Psychology, 52:1, pp. 83110, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Turkle, Sherry. ( 2011), Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Walther, Joseph,, Van Der Heide, Brandon,, Kim, Sang-Yeon,, Westerman, David, and Tong, Stephanie. ( 2008;), ‘ The role of friends’ appearance and behaviour on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep?. ’, Human Connection Research, 34:1, pp. 2849, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227674008_The_Role_of_Friends’_Appearance_and_Behavior_on_Evaluations_of_Individuals_on_Facebook_Are_We_Known_by_the_Company_We_Keep. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Weinstein, Sally,, Mermelstein, Robin,, Hankin, Benjamin,, Hedeker, Donald, and Flay, Brian. ( 2007;), ‘ Longitudinal patterns of daily affect and global mood during adolescence. ’, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17:3, pp. 587600, https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc2373258. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. White, Allison,, Weinstein, Emily, and Selman, Robert. ( 2018;), ‘ Adolescent friendship challenges in a digital context: Are new technologies game changers, amplifiers, or just a new medium?. ’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24:3, pp. 26988, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856516678349. Accessed 7 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Dempsey, Lauren. ( 2020;), ‘ Growing up in a digital era: The journey towards independence, agency and individuality. ’, Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 11:3, pp. 325342, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc_00028_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00028_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/iscc_00028_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error