Youth-powered or empowered: How self-determination theory can help us better understand youth media dynamics with adult facilitators during the pandemic | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2634-4726
  • E-ISSN: 2206-5857

Abstract

Youth media literature celebrates youth voice but rarely discusses the power dynamics between adult mentors and youth. This case study explores these power dynamics in cultivating trust between teenagers creating community media and their adult mentors on Chicago’s South Side. The authors identified three self-determination themes relating to these power dynamics between the youth and adults in the production process during the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) generating routines to foster a sense of competency; (2) having a sense of belonging by creating caring interactions; (3) allowing participants to voice their opinion to increase their sense of autonomy. Being Black teenagers in the middle of the pandemic along with the social unrest was challenging. Creating their own media for a specific target audience in their community, instead of a cable TV channel, supported the youth’s sense of power to come intrinsically and not from the adult facilitators.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00115_1
2023-10-14
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blum-Ross, Alicia (2015), ‘Filmmakers/educators/facilitators? Understanding the role of adult intermediaries in youth media production in the UK and the USA’, Journal of Children and Media, 9:3, pp. 30824, https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1058280.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blum-Ross, Alicia (2017), ‘Voice, empowerment and youth-produced films about “gangs”’, Learning, Media and Technology, 42:1, pp. 5473, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1111240.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boggs, George L., Fendler, Rachel, Shields, Sara S., Tripp, Lisa M. and Pengelley, Ivanna R. (2017), ‘Partnership literacies: Who’s got the camera?’, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61:2, pp. 21316, https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.680.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyatzis, Richard E. (1998), Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke, Kevin J., Greene, Stuart and McKenna, Maria (2017), ‘Youth voice, civic engagement and failure in participatory action research’, The Urban Review, 49, pp. 585601, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0410-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl, Ingrid H. (2009), ‘Report: State of the youth media field’, Youth Media Reporter, 3:6, http://www.youthmediareporter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/SOF-FINAL-Nov24.pdf. Accessed 21 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraenkel, Jack R., Wallen, Norman E. and Hyun, Helen H. (2012), How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th ed., New York: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Friesem, Yonty (2015), ‘On becoming a digital literacy mentor: Self-determination and media production in elementary education’, Ph.D thesis, University of Rhode Island, https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/399/. Accessed 21 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Friesem, Yonty (2019), ‘Youth media’, in R. Hobbs and P. Mihailidis (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 116, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0246.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodman, Steve (2003), Teaching Youth Media: A Critical Guide to Literacy, Video Production, and Social Change, New York: Teachers College Press and Columbia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hauge, Chelsey (2014), ‘Youth media and agency’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35:4, pp. 47184, https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.871225.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Herring, Susan C. (2008), ‘Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity’, in D. Buckingham (ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 7392.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jennings, Louise B., Parra-Medina, Deborah M., Hilfinger-Messias, Deanne K. and McLoughlin, Kerry (2008), ‘Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment’, Journal of Community Practice, 14:1&2, pp. 3155, https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_03.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kennelly, Jacqueline (2018), ‘Envisioning democracy: Participatory filmmaking with homeless youth’, Canadian Review of Sociology, 55:2, pp. 190210, https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12189.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Levine, Peter (2008), ‘A public voice for youth: The audience problem in digital media and civic education’, in W. Lance Bennett (ed.), Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 11938, https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262524827.119.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Liou,  Al and Literat, Ioana (2020), ‘“We need you to listen to us”: Youth activist perspectives on intergenerational dynamics and adult solidarity in youth movements’, International Journal of Communication, 14, pp. 466282, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15807/3209. Accessed 21 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Merriam, Sharan B. (2001), Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Patton, Michael Q. (2015), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pienimäki, Mari (2019), ‘Improving the wellbeing of at-risk youth through media participation’, Media Practice and Education, 20:4, pp. 36477, https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1541371.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Przybylski, Andrew K., Rigby, Scott C. and Ryan, Richard M. (2010), ‘A motivational model of video game engagement’, Review of General Psychology, 14:2, pp. 15466, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodríguez, Clemencia (2021), ‘Community media’, in M. Baker, B. B. Blaagaard, H. Jones and L. Pérez-González (eds), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, New York: Routledge, pp. 8085.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rogers, Theresa, Winters, Kari-Lynn, LaMonde, Anne-Marie and Perry, Mia (2010), ‘From image to ideology: Analysing shifting identity positions of marginalized youth across the cultural sites of video production’, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5:4, pp. 298312, https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2010.509473.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ryan, Richard and Deci, Edward L. (2000), ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being’, American Psychologist, 55:1, pp. 6878, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Seal, Mike (2018), Participatory Pedagogic Impact Research: Co-production with Community Partners in Action, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tyner, Kathleen (2003), A Closer Look 2003: Special Edition on Youth Media, San Francisco, CA: National Alliance of Media Arts and Culture.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00115_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error