Social media and power in the Arab world: From dominant ideology to popular agency | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research
  4. Volume 12, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1751-9411
  • E-ISSN: 1751-942X

Abstract

Conceptualizing the social and political possibilities of digital mass-mediated communication in modern societies has generated a critical debate, ranging from proponents who conceive of its promising profound potential to sceptics who dismiss it as a trivial sociopolitical vacuity. For some observers in the field, social media has been mobilized to maintain hegemonic structures through a ‘weaponization’ of popular narratives on behalf of the dominant political elite. For others, social media discourse has signalled the end of grand narratives of political ideology, and has ultimately ushered in the age of subjective digital narcissism not unlike that of consumer culture in late capitalist societies. Beyond these two broader frameworks of inquiry, this article seeks to investigate the critical agency, popular sovereignty and transformative possibilities in socio-digital discourse in the modern Arab Gulf region. Recognizing the dominant and residual ideology within social media narratives, the article deploys Raymond Williams’ critical and insightful concept of ‘structures of feeling’ in order to critically assess the alternative emergent collective expressions that diverge from, yet respond to, hegemonic and dominant discourse. One of the main goals of this article, therefore, is to go beyond the conventional analysis of ‘utopian versus dystopian’ binary instrumentalization of social media in the region, to challenge the claim that media (both as technology and as technique) determine social and political consciousness. More specifically, and in contrast to McLuhan’s famed dictum that ‘the medium is the message’, this article contends that digital and social media virtues and contributions are not confined to the instrumental communication that serves practical purposes. Rather, and more fundamentally, digital and social media involve the practices and lived experiences of individuals, culture and society, especially those that constitute the formations of collective and emergent identities.

© 2019 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00003_1
2019-11-01
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abu Toameh, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ After Warsaw Summit, Arabs launch “Anti-Normalization” campaign. ’, Jerusalem Post, 16 February, https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/After-Warsaw-summit-Arabs-launch-anti-normalization-campaign-580855. Accessed 13 March 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, S.. ( 2004;), ‘ Affective economies. ’, Social Text, 79 , 22:2 (Summer), pp. 117–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Asimi, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ If your friend deceives you, place him in your enemy camp. ’, Al-Riyadh Newspaper, 6 June, http://www.alriyadh.com/1600304. Accessed 2 March 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Jazeera ( 2019;), ‘ Palestine is not for sale. Widespread rejection to the Bahrain workshop on social media. ’, Al-Jazeera, 25 June, https://www.aljazeera.net/programs/aja-interactive/2019/6/25/%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B7%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D9%84%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B9-%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B6-%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%B9-%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B4%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%84. Accessed 27 June 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. al-Rashid, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Do you stand with Iran or Israel?. ’, Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, 11 May, London , https://aawsat.com/home/article/1264566/%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%AF/%D9%85%D8%B9-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%82%D9%81-%D8%A5%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A3%D9%85-%D8%A5%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%9F. Accessed 1 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbrook, R., and Cameron, A.. ( 1996;), ‘ The Californian ideology. ’, Science as Culture, 6:1, pp. 44–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett, W. L., and Segerberg, A.. ( 2012;), ‘ The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 15:5, pp. 739–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Best, B.. ( 2012;), ‘ Raymond Williams and the structure of feeling of reality TV. ’, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2:7, April, pp. 192–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Boxerman, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ In Saudi media, a tug of war over relations with Israel. ’, The Times of Israel, 26 May, https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-saudimedia-a-tug-of-war-over-relations-with-israel/. Accessed 30 March 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyd-Barrett, O.. ( 2016), Media Imperialism, Los Angeles, CA:: SAGE Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Castells, M.. ( 2009), Communication Power, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Castells, M.. ( 2012), Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, Cambridge:: Polity;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Christensen, C.. ( 2011;), ‘ Discourses of technology and liberation: State aid to net activists in an era of “Twitter Revolutions”. ’, The Communication Review, 14:3, pp. 233–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Christiansen, S.. ( n.d;.), ‘ Structures of feeling and the popular. ’, self-published , https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/221130330/Structures_of_Feeling_and_the_Popular.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019.
  15. Coleman, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Theorizing the present: Digital media, pre-emergence and infra-structures of feeling. ’, Cultural Studies, 32:4, pp. 600–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Curran, J.,, Fenton, N., and Freedman, D.. ( 2012), Misunderstanding the Internet, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Elseewi, T. A.. ( 2011;), ‘ A revolution of the imagination. ’, International Journal of Communication, 5, pp. 1197–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Fenton, N., and Barassi, V.. ( 2011;), ‘ Alternative media and social networking sites. ’, The Communication Review, 14:3, pp. 179–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Filmer, P.. ( 2003;), ‘ Structures of feeling and socio-cultural formations: The significance of literature and experience to Raymond Williams’s sociology of culture. ’, British Journal of Sociology, 54:2 (June), pp. 199–219.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuchs, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Labor in informational capitalism and on the internet. ’, The Information Society, 26:3, pp. 179–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuchs, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ The political economy of privacy on Facebook. ’, Television & New Media, 13:2, pp. 139–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fuchs, C.. ( 2014), Digital Labour and Karl Marx, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fuchs, C.. ( 2015), Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibbs, D.. ( 2004;), ‘ Pretexts and US foreign policy: The war on terrorism in historical perspective. ’, New Political Science, 26:3, pp. 293–321.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Haaretz ( 2018;), ‘ Arab Gulf country of Bahrain: Israel has “right” to defend itself against Iran. ’, Haaretz, 10 May, https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/bahrain-defends-israel-s-right-to-defend-itself-against-iran-1.6075271. Accessed 13 January 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Habermas, J.. ( 1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge:: Polity;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hardt, M., and Negri, A.. ( 2000), Empire, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Harding, D.. ( 2017;), ‘ Qatar crisis turns hostile on social media. ’, ABS-CBN News, 14 June, https://news.abs-cbn.com/trending/06/13/17/qatar-crisis-turns-hostile-on-social-media. Accessed 18 September 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hebblethwaite, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ Why Twitter is so big in Saudi Arabia. ’, BBC Trending, 23 January, https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-25864558. Accessed 2 January 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Iosifidis, P., and Wheeler, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ The public sphere and network democracy: Social movements and political change?. ’, Global Media Journal, 13:25, pp. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Jones, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Propaganda, fake news, and fake trends: The weaponization of Twitter bots in the Gulf crisis. ’, In International Journal of Communication, 13, pp. 1389–415.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones, M., and Abrahams, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ A plague of Twitter bots is roiling the Middle East. ’, The Washington Post, 5 June, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/06/05/fighting-the-weaponization-of-social-media-in-the-middle-east/?utm_term=.6cd0e18c431b. Accessed 2 June 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jowett, G. S., and O’Donnell, V.. ( 2015), Propaganda and Persuasion, Los Angeles, CA:: SAGE Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Juris, J.. ( 2008), Networking Futures: The Movements against Corporate Globalization, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lindsey, R.. ( 2013;), ‘ What the Arab Spring tells us about the future of social media in revolutionary movements. ’, Small Wars Journal, https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/what-the-arab-spring-tells-us-about-the-future-of-social-media-in-revolutionary-movements. Accessed 16 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lister, M.,, Dovey, J.,, Giddings, S.,, Grant, I., and Kelly, K.. ( 2009), New Media: A Critical Introduction, , 2nd ed.., London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lovink, G.. ( 2011), Networks without a Cause: A Critique of Social Media, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lynch, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ After Egypt: The limits and promise of online challenges to the authoritarian Arab state. ’, Perspectives on Politics, 9:2, pp. 301–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lynch, M.. ( 2013), The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East, New York, NY:: Public Affairs;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lynch, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ How media trashed the transitions. ’, Journal of Democracy, 26:4, pp. 90–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Markham, T.. ( 2014;), ‘ Social media, protest cultures and political subjectivities of the Arab Spring. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 36:1, pp. 89–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Morozov, E.. ( 2011), The Dark Side of Internet Freedom, New York, NY:: Public Affairs;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Murphy, D., and White, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ Propaganda: Can a word decide a war?. ’, Parameters, 37:14, pp. 15–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Oxford Reference ( n.d;.), ‘ Structures of feeling. ’, Oxford Reference, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100538488. Accessed 9 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Perry, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ The Arab world: Against Iran, with Israel. ’, Al-Quds Al-Arabi, 13 May, https://www.alquds.co.uk/%EF%BB%BF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A-%D8%B6%D8%AF-%D8%A5%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%B9-%D8%A5%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84/. Accessed 2 June 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Pinnell, O.. ( 2018;), ‘ The online war between Qatar and Saudi Arabia. ’, BBC Trending, 3 June, https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-44294826. Accessed 11 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Sassen, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Interactions of the technical and the social: Digital formations of the powerful and the powerless. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 15:4, pp. 455–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Saudis Against Normalization ( n.d.;), ’ Twitter #. ’ https://twitter.com/hashtag/%D8%B3%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86_%D8%B6%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B7%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B9?src=hash&lang=en. Accessed 11 April 2019.
  49. Sawa News ( 2019;), ‘ Bahrainis raise the Palestinian flag in opposition to the Mana workshop [summit]. ’, Sawa News, 25 June, https://palsawa.com/post/212056/%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B9%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B7%D9%8A%D9%86%D9%8A-%D9%81%D9%88%D9%82-%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%84%D9%87%D9%85-%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B6%D8%A7-%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B4%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A9. Accessed 1 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Schäfer, M. S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Digital public sphere. ’, in G. Mazzoleni,, K. Barnhurst,, K. Ikeda,, M. Rousiley, and H. Wessler. (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, London:: Wiley Blackwell;, pp. 322–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Seib, P.. ( 2012), Real-Time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era, New York:: Palgrave-Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Sharma, D., and Tygstrup, F.. (eds) ( 2015), Structures of Feeling: Affectivity and the Study of Culture, Berlin:: De Gruyter;.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Stiegler, B.. ( 2008), Acting Out, Stanford:: Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Street, J.. ( 1996;), ‘ Remote control: Politics, technology and culture. ’, in I. Hampsher-Monk, and J. Stanyer. (eds), Contemporary Politics Studies, vol. 1, London:: Political Studies Association;.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Williams, R.. ( 1968), Culture and Society, London:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Williams, R.. ( 1974), Television: Technology and Cultural Form, London:: Fontana;.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Williams, R.. ( 1977), Marxism and Literature, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Williams, R.. ( 1980), Culture and Materialism, London:: Verso Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Williams, R.. ( 1983), Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, London:: Fontana;.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Williams, R.. ( 1989), Resources of Hope, London:: Verso Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Al-Zo’by, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Social media and power in the Arab world: From dominant ideology to popular agency. ’, Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 12:2, pp. 191–211, doi: 10.1386/jammr_00003_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00003_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): agency; Arab world; dominant ideology; popular sovereignty; social media

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error