Digital China and its discontents: On the politics of Sinofuturism and image building at the Venice Biennale | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

This article examines how the China Pavilion at the 2022 Venice Biennale attempts to reimagine a new ontology between contemporary Chinese art, artificial intelligence-generated art and artistic practices, as well as the official Chinese discourse on technological positivity. It argues that the China Pavilion can be read through the lens of a Sinofuturist discourse and how the pavilion is spatially and temporally situated in contemporary digital Chinese art. Taking the title ‘Meta-Scape’, the China Pavilion can be understood as a futuristic phototype that the Chinese state mobilizes in formulating a rhetoric of a cohesive digital civilization. This underlines the ways the pavilion not only generates technological inquiries to imagine new paths for artistic practices but also manifests the role that Chinese new media art has on rendering the nation’s international image. In exploring one of the AI-generated artworks titled (2022), this article investigates how the ‘techno-turn’ in contemporary Chinese art illuminates the digitalization of cultural memory in relation to the dynamics and discontents between technological aestheticism and China’s national image building process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00086_1
2023-12-08
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aronczyk, Melissa (2013), Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlant, Lauren (2011), Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao, Jenifer (2022), ‘The visual politics of brand China: Exceptional history and speculative future’, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 19:3, pp. 30516, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00270-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Choudary, Sangeet Paul (2020), ‘China’s country-as-platform strategy for global influence’, Brookings Institution, 19 November, https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/chinas-country-as-platform-strategy-for-global-influence/. Accessed 28 September 2023.
  5. Conn, Virginia L. (2020), ‘Sinofuturism and Chinese science fiction: An introduction to the alternative Sinofuturisms’, SFRA Review, 50:2, pp. 6670.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidson, Jane Chin (2020), Staging Art and Chineseness: The Politics of Trans/Nationalism and Global Expositions, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Nigris, Ornella (2019), ‘Continuum generation by generation: The representation of Chinese traditions at the China Pavilion of the 57th Venice Biennale’, Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 6:2, pp. 34366, https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00011_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Derrida, Jacques (1995), Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Diep, Van Thi (2017), ‘The landscape of the void: Truth and magic in Chinese landscape painting’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 16:1, pp. 7786, https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2016.1245489.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dinerstein, Joel (2006), ‘Technology and its discontents: On the verge of the posthuman’, American Quarterly, 58:3, pp. 56995, https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2006.0056.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding, Sheng ([2007] 2008), ‘Digital diaspora and national image building: A new perspective on Chinese diaspora study in the age of China’s rise’, Pacific Affairs, 80:4, pp. 62748, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40377433. Accessed 7 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fan, Ying (2016), ‘Branding the nation: What is being branded?’, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 12:1, pp. 514.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitzgerald, Scott and Kattan, Bana (2016), Invisible Threads: Technology and Its Discontents, exhibition catalogue, NYUAD Art Gallery, Abu Dhabi, 22 September– 31 December.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Foster, Hal (1996), The Return of the Real: The Avant-Garde at the End of the Century, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gere, Charlie (2004), ‘New media art and the gallery in the digital age’, Tate Papers, Autumn, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gladston, Paul (2019), Contemporary Chinese Art, Aesthetic Modernity and Zhang Peili: Towards a Critical Contemporaneity, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodman, Steve (1998), ‘Fei ch’ien rinse out: Sino-futurist under-currency’, Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 7, pp. 15571.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenspan, Anna (2014), Shanghai Future: Modernity Remade, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall, Stuart (2001), ‘Encoding, decoding’, in S. During (ed.), The Cultural Studies Reader: Second Edition, London: Routledge, pp. 50717.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hui, Yuk (2016), The Question Concerning Technology in China, Falmouth: Urbanomic Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hui, Yuk (2017), ‘On cosmotechnics: For a renewed relation between technology and nature in the Anthropocene’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21:2, pp. 31941.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hui, Yuk (2021), Art and Cosmotechnics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jacques, Martin (2011), ‘Civilization state versus nation-state’, Martin Jacques, 15 January, http://www.martinjacques.com/articles/civilization-state-versus-nation-state-2/. Accessed 7 May 2023.
  24. Jasanoff, Sheila (2015), ‘Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity’, in S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim (eds), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 133.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jasanoff, Sheila and Kim, Sang-Hyun (2009), ‘Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the U.S. and South Korea’, Minerva, 47:2, pp. 11946.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Keane, Michael (2021), ‘Digital civilisation in the making (Part 1)’, MichaelKeane.com, 11 October, https://michael-keane.com/2021/10/11/digital-civilisation-in-the-making-part-1/. Accessed 15 November, 2022.
  27. Keane, Michael and Zhao, Elaine Jing (2014), ‘The reform of the cultural system: Culture, creativity and innovation in China’, in H.-K. Lee and L. Lam (eds), Cultural Policies in East Asia: Dynamics between the State, Arts and Creative Industries, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15573.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Koch, Franziska (2016), ‘“Chineseness” in contemporary art discourse and practice: Negotiating multiple agencies, localities and vocalities’, Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 3:1, pp. 311, https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca.3.1-2.3_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. La Biennale di Venezia (2022), 59th International Art Exhibition: The Milk of Dreams – Participating Countries and Collateral Events, exhibition catalogue, Biennale Arte 2022, Venice, 23 April–27 November.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lek, Lawrence (2016), ‘Sinofuturism (1839–2046 AD)’, Vimeo, 21 August, https://vimeo.com/179509486. Accessed 8 December 2022.
  31. Li, Hua (2015), ‘The political imagination in Liu Cixin’s critical utopia: China 2185’, Science Fiction Studies, 42:3, pp. 51940, https://doi.org/10.5621/sciefictstud.42.3.0519.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Xing and Shaw, Timothy M. (2013), ‘The political economy of Chinese state capitalism’, Journal of China and International Relations, 1:1, pp. 88113, https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jcir.v1i1.218.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, Jerry C. Y. (2014), ‘Reorienting cultural policy: Cultural statecraft and cultural governance in Taiwan and China’, in H.-K. Lee and L. Lam (eds), Cultural Policies in East Asia: Dynamics between the State, Arts and Creative Industries, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 12038.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, Jiayu (2022b), ‘Streaming Stillness’, Vimeo, 20 April, https://vimeo.com/713085431?embedded=true&source=vimeo_logo&owner=14230389. Accessed 6 December 2022.
  35. Liu, Ziyu Kevin (2019), ‘Commercial-state empire: A political economy perspective on social surveillance in contemporary China’, Political Economy of Communication, 7:1, pp. 329.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu Jiayu Studio (2022a), ‘Streaming Stillness’, https://www.jiayuliu.studio/2022-streaming-stillness-虚极静笃. Accessed 18 November 2022.
  37. Meng, Liuxi Louis (2015), ‘Idea-scape (yijing): Understanding imagery in the Chinese poetic tradition’, Comparative Literature: East & West, 23:1, pp. 2948, https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2015.12015443.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ministry of Culture and Tourism of People’s Republic of China (2016), ‘Belt and Road Cultural Development Action Plan (2016–2020)’, 9 January, http://www.eamcp.net/en/beltandroad/supportpolicies/20200706418.html. Accessed 7 May 2023.
  39. Nye, David E. (1996), American Technological Sublime, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nye, Joseph S. (2022), The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pollio, Andrea (2022), ‘The digital silk road as planetary intelligence: A story of China in Africa’, in R. Singh, R. L. Guzmán and P. Davison (eds), Parables of AI in/from the Majority World, New York: Data & Society Research Institute, pp. 8999.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sobchack, Vivian (2004), ‘Science fiction film and the technological imagination’, in M. Sturken, D. Thomas and S. J. Ball-Rokeach (eds), Technological Visions: The Hopes and Fears That Shape New Technologies, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 14558.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Song, Bing (2021), ‘Introduction: How Chinese philosophers think about artificial intelligence?’, in B. Song (ed.), Intelligence and Wisdom: Artificial Intelligence Meets Chinese Philosophers, London: Springer, pp. 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tsu, Jing (2022), Kingdom of Characters: The Language Revolution That Made China Modern, New York: Riverhead Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ullens Centre for Contemporary Art (2017), ‘“The new normal: China, art, and 2017” artist talk series: Sonic fiction Sinofuturism in contemporary music’, https://ucca.org.cn/en/program/sonic-fiction-sinofuturism-in-contemporary-music-2/. Accessed 8 December 2022.
  46. Wang, Jiabo (2021), ‘Folk culture China in the China Pavilion, Venice Biennale: Repositioning “Chineseness” in contemporary art discourse’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 20:1&2, pp. 8196, https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2021.1921484.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, Xiaoguang (2020), ‘The “techno-turn” of China’s official discourse on nationalism’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 53:4, pp. 22039, https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2020.53.4.220.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, Xin (2017), ‘Asian futurism and the non-other’, e-flux Journal, 81, pp. 110, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/81/126662/asian-futurism-and-the-non-other/. Accessed 27 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Winter, Tim (2021), ‘Geocultural power: China’s belt and road initiative’, Geopolitics, 26:5, pp. 137699, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1718656.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wong, Mimi (2020), ‘The aesthetic project of remaking “yellow” identity’, Asia Art Archive, https://aaa.org.hk/en/ideas-journal/ideas-journal/the-aesthetic-project-of-remaking-yellow-identity. Accessed 27 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Xi, Jingping (2021), ‘Xi focus: Xi stresses sci-tech self-strengthening at higher levels’, Xinhua, 29 May, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-05/29/c_139976311.htm. Accessed 5 May 2023.
  52. Yang, Fan (2016), Faked in China: Nation Branding, Counterfeit Culture and Globalization, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Ge (2021), ‘Sino-no-futurism’, Verge: Studies in Global Asias, 7:2, p. 92, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A667600085/AONE?u=lond95336&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=f94f5a3f. Accessed 9 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, Gary Zhexi (2017), ‘Where next? Imagining the dawn of the “Chinese century”’, Frieze, 22 April, https://www.frieze.com/article/where-next-imagining-dawn-chinese-century. Accessed 8 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, Gary Zhexi (2021), ‘Sinofuturism and its uses: Contemporary art and diasporic desire’, Verge: Studies in Global Asias, 7:2, p. 86, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A667600084/AONE?u=lond95336&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=3e04e0ee. Accessed 9 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, Zikang (2022), ‘Presenting the development system of Chinese art, combining technology with art’, Central Academy of Fine Arts, 15 April, https://www.cafa.com.cn/en/news/details/8331333. Accessed 8 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00086_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00086_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error