Capitalizing on art and artifying capitals: China’s journey to Venice and scandal around the Kenya Pavilion | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art
  4. Volume 10, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

Embedded in a globalized framework, contemporary Chinese art operates as a powerful network of socio-economic and ideological relationships. Both China and Chinese artists have been assimilated into the global art system, which is firmly built on the basis of capitalism. The world saw a surge in artistic activism in the years between 2008 and 2014, with biennales emerging as the gravitational field in which left-wing theories critically addressed economic and cultural exploitation, as well as the disparities arising from the global capitalist system. While western discourses on contemporary art rejected complicity with the neo-liberal order, refusing to be reduced to ‘a consumable sign of opposition’, the Chinese artworld still upheld neo-liberal values at the Venice Biennale. The incidents involving Chinese artists ‘renting’ the Kenya Pavilion and representing Kenya for the 55th and 56th Venice Biennales in 2013 and 2015 became viral media sensations, prompting accusations of ‘neo-liberalism’ and ‘neo-colonialism’. This article takes the Venetian farce, with a focus on the Kenya Pavilion, as the point of departure to investigate the fame-driven image of China.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00089_1
2023-12-08
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boswell, Phoebe (2015),‘The Venice hustle: How an Italian hotelier came to represent Kenya at the Venice Biennale’, Africa Is a Country, 23 March, https://africasacountry.com/2015/03/the-italian-hotelier-representing-kenya-at-the-venice-biennale. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, Nicholas (2019), Autonomy: The Social Ontology of Art under Capitalism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Change.org (2015a), ‘Petition update: Kenya government disowns national pavilion in 56th Venice Biennale, calls organizers “imposters”’, Change.org, 14 April, https://www.change.org/p/government-of-kenya-ministry-of-sports-culture-and-the-arts-kenya-renounce-kenya-s-fraudulent-representation-at-56-venice-biennial-2015-commit-to-support-the-realisation-of-a-national-pavilion-in-2017/u/10470441. Accessed 19 May 2023.
  4. Change.org (2015b), ‘Renounce Kenya’s fraudulent representation at 56th Venice Bienniale 2015 and commit to support the realization of a national pavilion in 2017’, Change.org, 18 March, https://chng.it/9fPhMJBB9n. Accessed 19 May 2023.
  5. Chao, Jenifer (2019), ‘China’s ancient past in its contemporary art: On the politics of time and nation branding at the Venice Biennale’, Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 6:2, pp. 321–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Danto, Arthur (1964), ‘The artworld’, The Journal of Philosophy, 61:19, pp. 571–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dimitrakaki, Angela (2012), ‘Art, globalization and the exhibition form: What is the case? What is the challenge?’, Third Text, 26:3, pp. 305–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Erickson, Britta (2002), ‘The reception in the West of experimental mainland Chinese art of the 1990s’, in H. Wu (ed.), Reinterpretation: A Decade of Experimental Chinese Art, Guangzhou: Guangdong Museum of Art, pp. 105–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Eyene, Christine (2014), ‘Africa at the 55th Venice Biennale: Of achievements and illusions’, African Arts, 47:1, pp. 1, 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferguson, Bruce and Hoegsberg, Milena (2010), ‘Talking and thinking about biennials: The potential of discursivity’, in E. Filipovic, M. van Hal and S. Øvstebø (eds), The Biennial Reader, Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, pp. 360–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Guangdong Museum of Art Website (2013), ‘Chinese independent art exhibition: Voice of the Unseen landed in Venice’, Guangdong Museum of Art Website, 28 April, https://www.gdmoa.org/exhibition/exhibitions/2013/xgwd_2013/201304/t20130428_12414.shtml. Accessed 19 May 2023.
  12. Klein, Alyssa (2015), ‘The shame in Venice: Michael Soi responds to the Chinese takeover of Kenya’s art pavilion’, Okay Africa, 30 March, https://www.okayafrica.com/venice-biennale-2015-kenyan-art-pavilion-michael-soi/. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kolb, Lucie and Flückinger, Gabriel (2013), ‘New institutionalism revisited’, On Curating, 21, pp. 6–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kompatsiaris, Panos (2014), ‘Curating resistances: Ambivalences and potentials of contemporary art biennials’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 7:1, pp. 76–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, Jianya (2015), ‘Weinisi shuangnianzhan: Zhongguo yishujia fengkuang shua cunzaigan’ (‘Venice Biennale: Chinese artists wholeheartedly crafted a publicity stunt’), Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, 6 May, http://www.rmzxb.com.cn/c/2015-05-06/494868.shtml. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Liao, Dongyun (2013), ‘Mian Bu: Weinisi jiushi yige kaifangxing bowuguan’ (‘Mian Bu: Venice is exactly an open museum’), hiart.cn, 19 June, http://www.hiart.cn/feature/detail/e7fcvzp.html. Accessed 25 October 2023.
  17. Liu, Lin (2015), ‘“Chuangzao shenfen” shi yishu wu guojie: Di 56 jie weinisi shuangnianzhan kenniya guojiaguan canzhan xinwen fabuhui zai ning juxing’ (‘“Creating identities” removes the geopolitical borders for art: Press conference for the Kenya Pavilion of the 56th Venice Biennale took place in Nanjing’), Zaker Nanjing Newspaper, 11 April, http://dz.xdkb.net/html/2015-04/11/content_392997.htm. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lü, Peng (1992), ‘Zhankai jiushi niandai: “Shuangnianzhan” zongxu dai ben ji qianyan’ (‘Open up the 1990s: Forewords for the “biennale” and the special issue’), Art. Market, May, p. 2.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lü, Peng (2013), ‘Introduction’, in R. Widmer and S. Huang (eds), 20 Years of La Biennale di Venezia and Chinese Contemporary Art: An Interview Collection, Chengdu: Museum of Contemporary Art, pp. i–xi.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lütticken, Sven ([2010] 2012), ‘Three autonomies and more’, The Autonomuy Project: Newspaper #1, Positioning, Eindhoven: Onomatopee, 14:3, pp. 32–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Moses, Serubiri (2015), ‘The double life of Kenya at Venice’, Contemporary And (C&), 6 April, https://contemporaryand.com/magazines/the-double-life-of-kenya-at-venice/. Accessed 19 May 2023.
  22. Orlandi, Sandro and Danzi, Michela (2012), Biennale Italia-Cina: Progetti Collaterali, Falciano: Maretti.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Orlandi, Sandro and Poponi, Paola (2013), Reflective Nature #: A New Primary Enchanting Sensitivity, Falciano: Maretti.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Pollack, Barbara (2014), ‘Shanghai’s tricky museum transformation’, Art News, 17 March, http://www.artnews.com/2014/03/17/shanghais-tricky-museum-transformation. Accessed 22 August 2023.
  25. Ruiz, Cristina (2017), ‘Kenya works a miracle to bring its exhibition to the Venice Biennale: Pavilion organizers put on a show despite receiving no government money’, The Art Newspaper, 15 May, theartnewspaper.com/2017/05/15/Kenya-works-a-miracle-to-bring-its-exhibition-to-the-venice-biennale. Accessed 8 August 2023.
  26. Sassatelli, Monica (2015), ‘The biennalization of art worlds: The culture of cultural events’, in L. Hanquinet and M. Savage (eds), International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 277–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheikh, Simon ([2009] 2010), ‘Marks of distinction, vectors of possibility: Questions for the biennial’, in E. Filipovic, M. van Hal and S. Øvstebø (eds), The Biennial Reader, Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, pp. 150–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Storr, Robert (1999), ‘Prince of tides: Robert Storr talks with Harald Szeemann’, Artforum, May, https://www.artforum.com/print/199905/prince-of-tides-venice-99-32299. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Szeemann, Harald, Sigg, Uli, Lin, Tianmiao, Wang, Gongxin, Wang, Wei, Hou, Hanru, Lu, Hao and Hai, Bo (2001), ‘Harald Szeemann talks to Chinese artists about Venice, CCAA, and curatorial strategies’, in H. Wu (ed.), Chinese Art at the Cross Roads: Between Past and Future, Between East and West, Hong Kong: New Art Media; London: Institute of International Visual Arts, pp. 148–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Tammen, Ronald L. (2000), Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century, New York: Seven Bridges Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. The Paper (2015), ‘It is all Chinese artists’ fault: Kenya disowns the national pavilion in the Venice Biennale’, The Paper, 28 April, https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1325690. Accessed 19 May 2023.
  32. Toledo, Manuel (2013), ‘Africa triumphs at the Venice Biennale’, BBC, 6 June, http//bbc.com/news/world-africa-22791617. Accessed 25 October 2023.
  33. Verwoert, Jan (2010), ‘The curious case of biennial art’, in E. Filipovic, M. van Hal and S. Ovstebo (eds), The Biennial Reader: An Anthology on Large-Scale Perennial Exhibitions of Contemporary Art, Bergen: Bergen Kunsthall, pp. 184–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Widmer, Richard and Huang, Shiyun (eds) (2013), 20 Years of La Biennale di Venezia and Chinese Contemporary Art: An Interview Collection, Chengdu: Chengdu Museum of Contemporary Art.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu, Chin-tao (2009), ‘Biennials without borders?’, New Left Review, 57, pp. 107–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu, Weizheng (2005), ‘Zhongguo guan shouci ruzhu weinisi shuangnianzhan’ (‘The China Pavilion first landed at the Venice Biennale’), People’s Daily, 9 June, p. 11.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu, Xiaoman (2014), ‘Yong yishu jiyi lishi’ (‘Remember history with art’), China Times, 18 July, https://www.chinatimes.net.cn/article/43915.html. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Yü, Na (2013), ‘Yishujia jiti quxian biaoda’ (‘The artists together took a circuitous route for artistic expression’), China Times, 8 June, https://m.chinatimes.net.cn/article/36805.html. Accessed 9 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Zaugg, Isabelle A. and Nishimura, Emi (2015), ‘Angola and Kenya Pavilions in the 2013 Venice Biennale: African contemporary art and cultural diplomacy in the “olympics of art”’, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 45:2, pp. 134–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Ni (2017), ‘Zhuanfang weinisi shuangnianzhan zhongguoguan cezhanren Qiu Zhijie: Zhongguo jilei de yishu nengliang biding yao shifang’ (‘Interview with curator of the China Pavilion Qiu Zhijie: We must release the energy of China’s accumulated art potentials’), Global Times, 26 May, https://world.huanqiu.com/article/9CaKrnK34qT. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Shuo (2015), ‘Venice Biennale: Chinese artists “occupied” Kenya’s national pavilion’, People’s Daily Online, 6 May, http://culture.people.com.cn/n/2015/0506/c172318-26956572.html. Accessed 19 May 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao, Xing (2018), ‘(Inter)Dependency: Privately owned art museums in state-sponsored West Bund’, Yishu: Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 17:1, pp. 30–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao, Yan (2013), ‘Jiemi weinisi shuangnianzhan “pingxingzhan” luanxiang: Shui zai wei yishujia canzhan maidan?’ (‘Decyphering the pandemonium of the parallel projects at the Venice Biennale: Who are sponsoring the artists’ overseas presence?’), Life Week, 28 June, http://old.lifeweek.com.cn//2013/0628/41279.shtml. Accessed 19 May 2023.
  44. Zhu, Jieshu (2015), ‘Weinisi shuangnianzhan: Zhengzhi yu ziben de jiaohui’ (‘Venice Biennale: The intersection of politics and capitals’), Sina Collection, 13 May, http://collection.sina.com.cn/hwdt/20150513/1142187000.shtml. Accessed 9 August 2023.
  45. Zhu, Qi (2001), ‘We are all too sensitive when it comes to awards! Cai Guoqiang and the copyright infringement problems surrounding Venice’s Rend Collection Courtyard’, in H. Wu (ed.), Chinese Art at the Cross Roads: Between Past and Future, Between East and West, Hong Kong: New Art Media; London: Institute of International Visual Arts, pp. 56–65.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00089_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): China Pavilion; cultural diplomacy; Kenya Pavilion; neo-colonialism; neo-liberalism; postsocialist art; Venice Biennale

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error