Helen Frankenthaler: Something new in terms of nature

References

1. Baro, Gene (1967), ‘The achievement of Helen Frankenthaler’, Art International, 2:7, pp. 33–38.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baur, John I. H. (1958), Nature in Abstraction: The Relation of Abstract Painting and Sculpture to Nature in Twentieth Century Contemporary Art, exhibition catalogue, Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, 14 January–16 March.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Coates, R. M. (1952a), ‘Exhibition at the metropolitan museum’, New Yorker, 28:86, 12 April.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Coates, R. M. (1952b), ‘Cézanne in a loan exhibition in Chicago and New York’, Connoisseur, American ed., 30:80, September.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Elderfield, John (1989), Frankenthaler, New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Elderfield, John and Wilkin, Karen (1998), conversation with author, New York, April.
7. Fitzsimmons, James (1952), ‘A Cézanne exhibition: A definition of greatness’, Art Digest, 26:10, February, pp. 7–8, 20.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Geldzahler, Henry (1965), ‘An interview with Helen Frankenthaler’, Artforum, 4:2, pp. 36–38.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Greenberg, Clement (1951), ‘Cézanne and the unity of modern art’, Partisan Review, 18:3, May–June, pp. 323–30.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Greenberg, Clement (1960), ‘Louis and Noland’, Art International, IV:5, 25 May, pp. 26–29.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Greenberg, Clement ([1951] 1993a), ‘Cézanne and the unity of modern art’, in J. O’Brian (ed.), John Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume 3: Affirmations and Refusal 1950–1956, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 82–90.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Greenberg, Clement ([1952] 1993b), ‘Cézanne gateway to contemporary painting’, in J. O’Brian (ed.), John Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume 3: Affirmations and Refusal 1950–1956, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 113–18.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hamilton, James (2014), quotation from the exhibition press release of Making Painting: Helen Frankenthaler and JMW Turner, Turner Contemporary, Margate, 25 January–11 May.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Marin, Louis (1995), ‘Panofsky and Poussin in Arcadia’, in W. Hamacher and D. E. Wellbery (eds), Sublime Poussin (trans. C. Porter), Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 104–19.
    [Google Scholar]
15. McC. Truitt, James (1961), ‘Art-Arid D.C. Harbours touted “new” painters’, The Washington Post, 21 December, p. A20.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964), ‘Cézanne’s doubt’, in Sense and Non-Sense (trans. H. L. Dreyfus and P. A. Dreyfus), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 9–25.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice ([1961] 1993), ‘Eye and mind’, in G. A. Johnson (ed.), The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 121–50.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Naifeh, Stephen and White Smith, Gregory (1989), Jackson Pollock: An American Saga, London: Barrie and Jenkins.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Panofsky, Erwin (1955), ‘Et in Arcadia ego: Poussin and the elegiac tradition’, in Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, pp. 295–320.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Poirier, Maurice (1985), ‘Working papers’, Art News, 84:6, pp. 79–83.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Reff, Theodore (1978), ‘Painting and theory in the final decade’, in R. Rubin (ed.), Cézanne The Late Work, London: Thames and Hudson, pp. 13–53.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rose, Barbara (1972), Frankenthaler, New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Rowley, Alison (2007), Helen Frankenthaler: Painting History, Writing Painting, London and New York: I. B. Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wagner, Anne (1999), ‘Pollock’s nature, Frankenthaler’s culture’, in K. Varnedoe and P. Karmel (eds), Jackson Pollock: New Approaches, New York: Museum of Modern Art, pp. 181–200.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Wilkin, Karen (1998), ‘Frankenthaler at the Guggenheim’, New Criterion, 16:7, pp. 44–49.
    [Google Scholar]