Curating Online Collections: Towards an Authentically Digital, Mediation Protocol for Art Digitizations | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Curatorial Studies
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2045-5836
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5844

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, cultural organizations have increasingly digitized their physical collections and made them available online; however, museums are still puzzled over what to do with these growing digital collections. Meanwhile, art institutions’ reluctance to produce virtual exhibitions, linked to a prevailing skeuomorphic paradigm, has left the matter of curating art digitizations unresolved. While museum computing scholarship has aptly identified the problematic absence of authentically digital curatorial processes, it has largely overlooked the fact that online collections and in-gallery group shows similarly condition artistic reception owing to a shared database logic, subjecting both to a mediation paradox in contemporary culture. This article examines the effects of this shared logic on public engagement, along with recent digital curatorial strategies that have emerged in response around notions of the digital aura and networked objects. The article concludes by proposing three conditions for an alternative curatorial process capable of adequately mediating art digitizations online without sacrificing aesthetic experience to the limited affordances of screen-based information and communications technologies.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Award 893454)
© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcs_00054_1
2022-04-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Axiell ( 2020;), ‘ Culture at a Crossroads: Digital Transformation in the Age of COVID-19. ’, https://www.axiell.com/report/report-culture-at-a-crossroads-digital-transformation-in-the-age-of-covid-19/. Accessed 17 June 2021.
  2. Bernhardt, Johannes,, Thiel, Sonja, and Lindner, Christiane. ( 2021;), ‘ One Brick Less in the Wall: The Case of the Baden State Museum. ’, MCN 2021 Virtual Conference, 26 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertrand, Stéphanie. ( 2022), Contemporary Curating, Artistic Reference and Public Reception: Reconsidering Inclusion, Transparency and Mediation in Exhibition Making Practice, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhaskar, Michael. ( 2017), Curation: The Power of Selection in a World of Excess, London:: Piatkus;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop, Claire. ( 2012;), ‘ Digital Divide: Contemporary Art and New Media. ’, Artforum, September, pp. 434–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishop, Claire. ( 2013), Radical Museology: Or, What’s ‘Contemporary’ in Museums of Contemporary Art?, London:: Koenig Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boltanski, Luc. ( 2011), On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation (trans. Gregory Elliott), Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolter, Jay David,, Macintyre, Blair,, Gandy, Maribeth, and Schweitzer, Petra. ( 2006;), ‘ New Media and the Permanent Crisis of the Aura. ’, The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 12:1, pp. 21–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron, Fiona. ( 2019;), ‘ Theorising Heritage Collection Digitisations in Global Computational Infrastructures. ’, in Hannah Lewi,, Wally Smith,, Dirk vom Lehn, and Steven Cooke. (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of New Digital Practices in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums and Heritage Sites, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 55–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaffee, Cathleen A.. ( 2009–10;), ‘ Situating Marcel Broodthaers’s Final Exhibitions. ’, Manifesta Journal, 7 (The Grammar of the Exhibition), pp. 40–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chalmers, Matthew, and Galani, Areti. ( 2008;), ‘ Blurring Boundaries for Museum Visitors. ’, in Paul F. Marty, and Katherine Burton Jones. (eds), Museum Informatics: People, Information and Technology in Museums, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 157–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan, Seb. ( 2017;), ‘ Words from Collaborating Around Collections at ANU Canberra 8/11/17. ’, Medium, 25 November, https://sebchan.medium.com/words-from-collaborating-around-collections-at-anu-canberra-8-11-17-bdd54fd5be89. Accessed 16 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Connor, Michael. ( 2020;), ‘ Curating Online Exhibitions, Part 1: Performance, Variability, Objecthood. ’, Rhizome, 13 May, https://rhizome.org/editorial/2020/may/13/curating-online-exhibitions-pt-1/. Accessed 23 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Connor, Michael. ( 2021;), ‘ The Rules of the Game: Curating Online Exhibitions, Part 2: Mise-en-scène. ’, Rhizome, 12 April, https://rhizome.org/editorial/2021/apr/12/the-rules-of-the-game/. Accessed 23 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cox, Geoff,, Dekker, Annett,, Dewdney, Andrew, and Sluis, Katerina. ( 2021;), ‘ Affordances of the Networked Image. ’, The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 61–62, pp. 40–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. CultureConnect ( 2021), Online Exhibitions vs. Online Collections, https://cultureconnectme.com/what-is-the-difference-between-online-exhibition-vs-collections-online/. Accessed 13 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. De Duve, Thierry. ( 1996), Kant After Duchamp, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. De Duve, Thierry. ( 2013), ‘“ This Is Art”: Anatomy of a Sentence’, lecture at the 7th Annual Kirk Varnedoe Lecture Series, Institute of Fine Arts, New York University;, New York:, 12 November, https://vimeo.com/79486770. Accessed 22 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dekker, Annet. (ed.) ( 2021), Curating Digital Art: From Presenting and Collecting Digital Art to Networked Co-Curation, Amsterdam:: Valiz;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dekker, Annet, and Tedone, Gaia. ( 2019;), ‘ Networked Co-Curation: An Exploration of the Socio-Technical Specificities of Online Curation. ’, Arts, 8:86, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Deng, Xiaoyan,, Unnava, H. Rao, and Lee, Hyojin. ( 2019;), ‘ “Too True to Be Good?” When Virtual Reality Decreases Interest in Actual Reality. ’, Journal of Business Research, 100, pp. 561–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Donovan, Kevin. ( 1997;), ‘ The Best of Intentions: Public Access, the Web and the Evolution of Museum Automation. ’, in David Bearman, and Jennifer Trant. (eds), Museums and the Web, Selected Papers from Museums and the Web 97, Pittsburgh:: Archives and Museum Informatics;, https://www.archimuse.com/mw97/speak/donovan.htm. Accessed 16 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Drabble, Barnaby. ( 2012;), ‘ Voices in the Exhibition. ’, On Curating, 15 (Performing the Exhibition), pp. 13–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Egger, Benjamin, and Ackermann, Judith. ( 2020;), ‘ Meta-Curating: Online Exhibitions Questioning Curatorial Practices in the Postdigital Age. ’, International Journal for Digital Art History, 5, pp. 3.18–3.34.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fingerhut, Joerg, and Prinz, Jesse J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Wonder, Appreciation and the Value of Art. ’, Progress in Brain Research, 237, pp. 107–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gell, Alfred. ( 1992;), ‘ The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology. ’, in Jeremy Coote, and Anthony Shelton. (eds), Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;, pp. 40–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Glicenstein, Jérôme. ( 2009), L’Art: Une Histoire d’Expositions, Paris:: Presses Universitaires de France;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hazan, Susan J.. ( 2001;), ‘ The Virtual Aura – Is There Space for Enchantment in a Technological World?. ’, Museums and the Web 2001: Selected Papers from an International Conference Held in Seattle, Washington, 14–17 March, Pittsburgh, PA:: Archives & Museum Informatics;, pp. 209–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Jeffrey, Stuart. ( 2015;), ‘ Challenging Heritage Visualisation: Beauty, Aura and Democratization. ’, Open Archeology, 1:1, pp. 144–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Joselit, David. ( 2013), After Art, Princeton and Oxford:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Paul Getty Museum ( n.d.;), ‘ Say Cheese!. ’, Pinterest, https://gr.pinterest.com/gettymuseum/say-cheese/. Accessed 16 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kalfatovic, Martin R.. ( 2002), Creating a Winning Online Exhibition: A Guide for Libraries, Archives and Museums, Chicago:: American Library Association;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kenderdine, Sarah, and Yip, Andrew. ( 2019;), ‘ The Proliferation of Aura: Facsimiles, Authenticity and Digital Objects. ’, in Kirsten Drotner,, Vince Dziekan,, Ross Parry, and Kim Christian Schrøder. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Museums, Media and Communication, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 274–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Knight Foundation ( 2020), Digital Readiness and Innovation in Museums: A Baseline National Survey, September, https://knightfoundation.org/reports/digital-readiness-and-innovation-in-museums/. Accessed 17 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Krauss, Rosalind E.. ( 1996;), ‘ Postmodernism’s Museum Without Walls. ’, in Reesa Greenberg,, Bruce W. Ferguson, and Sandy Nairne. (eds), Thinking About Exhibitions, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 341–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Laric, Olivier. ( 2013;), An Incomplete Timeline of Online Exhibitions and Biennials. , Rhizome ArtBase, https://artbase.rhizome.org/wiki/Q1276. Accessed 13 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Latour, Bruno, and Lowe, Adam. ( 2010;), ‘ The Migration of The Aura, or How to Explore the Original Through Its Facsimiles. ’, in Thomas Bartscherer, and Roderick Coover. (eds), Switching Codes: Thinking Through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts, Chicago:: Chicago University Press;, pp. 275–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lewi, Hannah, and Smith, Wally. ( 2019;), ‘ Interview with Keir Winesmith. ’, in Hannah Lewi,, Wally Smith,, Dirk vom Lehn, and Steven Cooke. (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of New Digital Practices in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums and Heritage Sites, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 42–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lind, Maria. ( 2013;), ‘ Why Mediate Art?. ’, in Jens Hoffmann. (ed.), Ten Fundamental Questions of Curating, Milan:: Mousse Publishing;, pp. 83–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lindell, Annukka K., and Mueller, Julia. ( 2011;), ‘ Can Science Account for Taste? Psychological Insights into Art Appreciation. ’, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23:4, pp. 453–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lotman, Jurij. ( 1977), The Structure of the Artistic Text (trans. Gail Lenhoff and Ronald Vroon), Ann Arbor:: University of Michigan Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Malraux, André. ( 1974), Voices of Silence (trans. Stuart Gilbert), Frogmore:: Paladin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Manovich, Lev. ( 2010;), ‘ Database as Symbolic Form. ’, in Ross Perry. (ed.), Museums in a Digital Age, New York and London:: Routledge;, pp. 64–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. NEMO ( 2021;), ‘ Follow-up Survey on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Museums in Europe. ’, January, https://www.ne-mo.org/fileadmin/Dateien/public/NEMO_documents/NEMO_COVID19_FollowUpReport_11.1.2021.pdf. Accessed 21 October 2021.
  45. Nesta ( 2019;), ‘ Digital Culture 2019. ’, November, https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/digital-culture-2019/. Accessed 17 June 2021.
  46. Newbury, David, and Brennan, Dan. ( 2021;), ‘ Digital Collections as Product. ’, MCN 2021 Virtual Conference, 9 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Paul, Christiane. ( 2008), New Media in the White Cube and Beyond, London:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Paul, Christiane. ( 2021;), ‘ Becoming Hybrid: The State of the Art in Mixed Realities. ’, HyMEx–Hybrid Museum Experience Symposium, 7 May, http://hymex2021.ludwigmuseum.hu/speaker/christiane-paul/. Accessed 12 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Peacock, Darren,, Ellis, Derek, and Doolan, John. ( 2004;), ‘ Searching for Meaning: Not Just Records. ’, in David Bearman, and Jennifer Trant. (eds), Museums and the Web 2004: Proceedings, Toronto:: Archives and Museum Informatics;, https://www.archimuse.com/mw2005/papers/brown/brown.html. Accessed 16 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Perry, Sara,, Rousseau, Maria,, Economou, Maria,, Young, Hilary, and Pujol, Laia. ( 2017;), ‘ Moving Beyond the Virtual Museum: Engaging Visitors Emotionally. ’, 23rd International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Dublin, https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346276. Accessed 23 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Rancière, Jacques. ( 2006), The Politics of Aesthetics (trans. Gabriel Rockhill), London:: Continuum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Relyea, Lane. ( 2017), Your Everyday Art World, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Schweibenz, Werner. ( 2013;), ‘ Museum Exhibitions – The Real and the Virtual Ones: An Account of a Complex Relationship. ’, Uncommon Culture, 3:5/6, pp. 38–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Schweibenz, Werner. ( 2019;), ‘ The Virtual Museum: An Overview of Its Origins, Concepts and Terminology. ’, The Museum Review, 4:1, https://themuseumreviewjournal.wordpress.com/2019/08/02/tmr_vol4no1_schweibenz/. Accessed 5 November 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Sherratt, Tim. ( 2019;), ‘ Hacking Heritage: Understanding the Limits of Online Access. ’, in Hannah Lewi,, Wally Smith,, Dirk vom Lehn, and Steven Cooke. (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of New Digital Practices in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums and Heritage Sites, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 116–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Smith, Koven J.. ( 2014;), ‘ The Museum as Skeuomorph: Examining the Idea of Skeuomorphism and How It (Unfortunately) Applies to a Lot of Museum Thinking. ’, 1 July, https://kovenjsmith.com/archives/1452/. Accessed 16 June 2021.
  57. Smith, Koven J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Musetech at Cruising Altitude: Some Further Thoughts after MW18 on the Contraction of the Musetech Sector and What that Might Mean for the Immediate Future of Our Work. ’, 16 May, https://kovenjsmith.com/post/the-end-of-a-cycle/. Accessed 17 June 2021.
  58. Smith, Koven J.. ( 2021;), e-mail to the author. , 12 April.
  59. Souffrant, Kantara, and Stein, Robert. ( 2021), ‘Imagining the Future of Online Collections’, MCN 2021 Virtual Conference, 7 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Tedone, Gaia. ( 2017;), ‘ Tracing Networked Images: An Emerging Method for Online Curation. ’, Journal of Media Practice, 18:1, pp. 51–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Tinsley, Howard E. A., and Eldredge, Barbara D.. ( 1995;), ‘ Psychological Benefits of Leisure Participation: A Taxonomy of Leisure Activities Based on Their Need-Gratifying Properties. ’, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42:2, pp. 123–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Trant, Jennifer. ( 2010;), ‘ When All You’ve Got Is “The Real Thing”: Museums and Authenticity in the Networked World. ’, in Ross Parry. (ed.), Museums in a Digital Age, Oxford and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 306–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Vickers, Ben. ( 2020;), ‘ Remediation & Digitisation. ’, Freiraum Festival 2020, 1 November, https://vimeo.com/494767575. Accessed 18 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Whitelaw, Mitchell. ( 2015;), ‘ Generous Interfaces for Digital Cultural Collections. ’, DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 9:1, http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000205/000205.html. Accessed 16 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Winesmith, Keir, and Grant, Flora. ( 2014;), ‘ How Do Institutional Philosophies Manifest in Online Collections?. ’, SFMOMA, September, https://www.sfmoma.org/read/how-do-institutional-philosophies-manifest-online-collections/. Accessed 16 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Zolghadr, Tirdad. ( 2016), Traction, Berlin:: Sternberg Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Bertrand, Stéphanie. ( 2022;), ‘ Curating Online Collections: Towards an Authentically Digital, Mediation Protocol for Art Digitizations. ’, Journal of Curatorial Studies, 11:1, pp. 26–51, https://doi.org/10.1386/jcs_00054_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jcs_00054_1
Loading
Curating Online Collections: Towards an Authentically Digital, Mediation Protocol for Art Digitizations
Journal of Curatorial Studies 11, 26 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/jcs_00054_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcs_00054_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcs_00054_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): collection database; digital curating; networked objects; online exhibitions; skeuomorphism; virtual museums

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error