Framing Thomas Wilfred’s Lumia: Museums, Intermedia and the Problem with Painting

References

1. Cheney, Sheldon (1924), A Primer of Modern Art, New York: Boni and Liveright.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cole, Mark (2020), e-mail correspondence with the author, 17 August.
3. Cooper, Harry (2020), e-mail correspondence with the author, 17 August.
4. Eidenberg, Roderick (1922), ‘Mobile Painting: Art’s Newest Expression’, International Studio, 75, p. 84.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eklund, Douglas, Friedman, Marilyn F. and Griffey, Randall R. (2020), ‘Reckoning with Modernism’, in Andrea Bayer and Laura D. Corey (eds), Making the Met: 1870–2020, New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, pp. 152–73.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Eskilson, Stephen (2003), ‘Thomas Wilfred and Intermedia: Seeking a Framework for Lumia’, Leonardo, 36:1, pp. 65–68.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Flinn, Elizabeth (1979), memo to William Lieberman, 14 December, Object file (60.185), New York: Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Frankenstein, Alfred (1959), ‘Art Shows in the Eastern Galleries’, San Francisco Sunday Chronicle, 4 January, n.p.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Glicksman, Hal (1971), letter to Louise Condit, 22 January, Object file (60.185), New York: Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Greenberg, Clement ([1965] 1982), ‘Modernist Painting’, in Francis Frascina and Charles Harrison (eds), Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology, New York: Harper and Row, pp. 5–10.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Harren, Natilee (2015), ‘The Crux of Fluxus: Intermedia, Rear-Guard’, Living Collections Catalogue: Art Expanded, 1958–1978, Minneapolis: Walker Art Center, http://walkerart.org/collections/publications/art-expanded/crux-of-fluxus. Accessed 9 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Harren, Natilee (2020), ‘Of Drips, Diagrams and Immanent Form: Fluxus in the Wake of Abstract Expressionist Painting’, Fluxus Forms: Scores, Multiples and the Eternal Network, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 71–100.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Higgins, Dick (1967), ‘Statement on Intermedia’, Dé-coll/age, 6 (July), n.p.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Higgins, Dick ([1965] 1984), ‘Synesthesia and Intersenses: Intermedia’, Horizons: The Poetics and Theory of the Intermedia, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 21–26.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hölling, Hanna B. (2017), Paik’s Virtual Archive: Time, Change and Materiality in Media Art, Oakland: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hölling, Hanna B. (2022), ‘Introduction: Object – Event – Performance’, Object – Event – Performance: Art, Materiality and Continuity Since the 1960s, New York: Bard Graduate Center, pp. 1–39.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jones, Kellie (2011), ‘To the Max: Energy and Experimentation’, EyeMinded: Living and Writing Contemporary Art, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 363–96.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Krauss, Rosalind (2000), A Voyage on the North Sea: Art in the Age of the Post-Medium Condition, London: Thames & Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Marclay, Christian and Tone, Yasunao ([1997] 2004), untitled discussion published in Music 1, reprinted as ‘Record, CD, Analog, Digital’, in Christoph Cox and Daniel Warner (eds), Audio Cultures: Readings in Modern Music, London: Continuum, pp. 341–47.
    [Google Scholar]
20. The Metropolitan Museum of Art (1958), exhibition press release for How to Look at Paintings, 17 September, https://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16028coll12/id/911. Accessed 10 September 2020.
21. Miller, Dorothy C. (1952), ‘Foreword’, in Dorothy C. Miller (ed.), 15 Americans, New York: Museum of Modern Art, p. 5.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Milman, Estera (1996), ‘Futurism as a Submerged Paradigm for Artistic Activism and Practical Anarchism’, South Central Review, 13:2/3, p. 157.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mitchell, W.J.T. (2005), ‘There Are No Visual Media’, Journal of Visual Culture, 4:2, pp. 257–66.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Moholy-Nagy, László ([1985] 1922), ‘Production – Reproduction (Produktion – Reproduktion)’, Moholy-Nagy (trans. K. Passuth), New York: Thames and Hudson, p. 290.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Museum of Modern Art (1952), extended exhibition press release for 15 Americans, ‘Series of Individual Shows to Compose “Fifteen Americans” Exhibition of Painting and Sculpture’, https://assets.moma.org/documents/moma_press-release_325839.pdf. Accessed 4 August 2020.
26. New York Herald (1922), ‘Plays Symphony in Colors on a Mobile Organ: Neighborhood Playhouse Presents a Novelty in Exhibition of New Invention’, 11 January, p. 10.
27. New York Times (1931), ‘New Kind of Painting Uses Light as Medium: Color Forms Projected on Canvas Through Lenses in Box in Invention of Wilfred’, 8 December, p. 34.
28. Orgeman, Keely (2017),  ‘A Radiant Manifestation in Space: Wilfred, Lumia and Light’, in Keely Orgeman (ed.), Lumia: Thomas Wilfred and the Art of Light, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 21–47.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sawin, Martica (1953), ‘Memorial for an American Pioneer’, Art Digest, 28, p. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Taylor, Deems (1924), ‘The Clavilux’, New York World, 27 December, p. 26.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Thomas Wilfred Papers (n.d.), MS 1375, Flyer, Box 4, Manuscripts and Archives, New Haven: Yale University.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Wilfred, Thomas (1947), ‘Light and the Artist’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 5:4, pp. 247–55.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wilfred, Thomas (1948a), ‘Composing in the Art of Lumia’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 7:2, pp. 79–93.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wilfred, Thomas (1948b), letter to the editor, in ‘Letters Pro and Con’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 6:3, pp. 271–76.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Wilfred, Thomas (1952), untitled artist’s statement, in Dorothy C. Miller (ed.), 15 Americans, New York: Museum of Modern Art, pp. 30–31.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wilfred, Thomas (1954), letter to Thomas Munro, 26 January, Object file (2000.129), Cleveland: Department of Modern, Contemporary and Decorative Art, Cleveland Museum of Art.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wilfred, Thomas (1958), letter to James Rorimer, 4 March, Object file (60.185), New York: Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wilfred, Thomas (1959), letter to Robert Beverly Hale, 19 January, Object file (60.185), New York: Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wilfred, Thomas (1962), letter to Eugene Kingman, 2 February, Object file (1962.21), Omaha: Joslyn Art Museum.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wilfred, Thomas (1968), interview with Patricia Marx on National Public Radio, 18 July, https://www.wnyc.org/story/thomas-wilfred. Accessed 1 September 2020.
41. Wilfred, Thomas (n.d.a), Biographical notes in general information booklet on Counterpoint in Space, Opus 146, Object file (60.185), New York: Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wilfred, Thomas (n.d.b), ‘Lumia: The Eighth Fine Art’, Object file (60.185), New York: Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wright, Willard Huntington (1923), The Future of Painting, New York: Huebsch.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Zinman, Gregory (2017), ‘Thomas Wilfred’s Aesthetic Legacy’, in Keely Orgeman (ed.), Lumia: Thomas Wilfred and the Art of Light, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 75–96.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Zinman, Gregory (2020), Making Images Move: Handmade Cinema and the Other Arts, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]