Lessons in Failure: Mavoch (1967) and the Labyrinth-Based Exhibition in Israel | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2045-5836
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5844

Abstract

In 1967, the Israel Museum in Jerusalem launched with great fanfare. Despite its innovative vision, critics swiftly dismissed the exhibition, and both the curator and the artists labelled it a failed experiment. This article revisits to consider it as a watershed event in Israeli exhibitionary practice. The show is examined in a broader discussion on the genre of labyrinth-based exhibitions on which was based. This genre, stemming from the surrealists’ shows in the 1930s and reaching its apex in Europe in the 1960s, heralded a shift in the concept of the museum from an object-oriented space to a dynamic venue of social participation. This article unravels the reasons behind the perceived failure of and offers insights on the implementation of western display models in geographical and cultural peripheries.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcs_00085_1
2024-01-12
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. ([1967] 1981), ‘Valéry Proust Museum’, in Prisms (trans. Samuel and Shierry Weber), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17585.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Altshuler, Bruce (2013), Biennials and Beyond: Exhibitions that Made Art History, 1962–2002, London: Phaidon.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson, Patrik (2001), Euro-Pop: The Mechanical Bride Stripped Bare in Stockholm, Even, Ph.D. thesis, Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. (1967), a protocol from an executive board meeting, 30 January, Exhibition Curatorial Files, folder #50-34, Jerusalem: Israel Museum.
  5. Appadurai, Arjun and Alexander, Neta (2019), Failure, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ardon, Ora (1965), ‘Touring with Sandberg’, LaMerhav, 14 May, p. 5.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aronsson, Peter and Elgenius, Gabriella (2015), ‘Introduction: Making Museums and Nations’, in Peter Aronsson and Gabriella Elgenius (eds), National Museums and Nation-Building in Europe 1750–2010, London: Routledge, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Azaryahu, Maoz (1992), ‘The Israeli Memorial: Myth, Art and Politics’, Studio Art Magazine, 37, pp. 2425.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Banai, Noit (2018), ‘The Labyrinth as an Exhibitionary Model: Form, Event and Mode of Life’, Stedelijk Studies, Special Issue: ‘Lose Yourself: on Labyrinthine Exhibitions as Curatorial Model’, 1, https://stedelijkstudies.com/journal/the-labyrinth-as-an-exhibitionary-model-form-event-and-mode-of-life. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BarEl, Yoav (1967), ‘The Labyrinth Inside the Israel Museum’, Haaretz, 17 March, p. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Baruch, Adam (1988), ‘Tzirofim’, in Amos Kenan (ed.), Sculpture in Israel: In Search for Identity, Tefen: Tel-Hai Museum, pp. 713.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bat Miriam, Hana (1967), ‘An Unsuccessful Maze at the Israel Museum’, Davar, 10 March, p. 13.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Benjamin, Walter (1969), ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, Illuminations: Essays and Reflections (trans. H. Zohn), New York: Schocken, pp. 25364.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bennett, Tony (1995), The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bergstein, Yael (2004), ‘I Would Say No’, Studio Art Magazine, 152, pp. 4249.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Boshes, Hedda (1967), ‘An Amusing and Not Boring Labyrinth’, Haaretz, 1 March, p. 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruyn, Eric de (2019), ‘Constructed Situations, Dynamic Labyrinths and Learning Mazes: Behavioral Topologies of the Cold War’, Grey Room, 74, pp. 4485.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Buchloh, Benjamin H. D. (2000), Neo-Avantgarde and Culture Industry: Essays on European and American Art from 1955 to 1975, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Burleigh, Paula (2018), The Labyrinth and the Cave: Archaic Forms in Art and Architecture of Europe, 1952–1972, Ph.D. thesis, New York: City University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chinski, Sara (2015), Kingdom of The Meek: The Social Grammar of the Israeli Art Field, Bnei Brak: Hakibbutz Hameuchad.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Debord, Guy ([1958] 2006a), ‘Theory of the Dérive’, in Ken Knabb (ed.), Situationist International Anthology, Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets, pp. 6266.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Debord, Guy ([1959] 2006b), ‘Détournement as Negation and Prelude’, in Ken Knabb (ed.), Situationist International Anthology, Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets, pp. 6768.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Debord, Guy ([1962] 2006c), ‘The Bad Days will End’, in Ken Knabb (ed.), Situationist International Anthology, Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets, pp. 10714.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Duncan, Carol (1995), Civilizing Rituals: Inside Public Art Museums, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Engel, Rachel (1967), ‘A Maze – or … an Amusement Park’, Maariv, 10 March, p. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Filipovic, Elena (2003), ‘Surrealism in 1938: The Exhibition at War’, in Raymond Spiteri and Donald Lacoss (eds), Surrealism, Politics and Culture, London: Routledge, pp. 179202.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fischer, Yona (1963), Art in Israel, Tel Aviv: Masada.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fischer, Yona (1967), Labyrinth: An Environment by 7 Israeli Artists, Jerusalem: Israel Museum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fischer, Yona (2021), in-person interview with the author, 30 August, Tel Aviv.
  30. Freud, Sigmund ([1919] 2003), The Uncanny (trans. D. McLintock), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gouri, Haim (1994), ‘Hayir Hakroa’, in Avi Bareli (ed.), Torn Jerusalem 1948–1967, Jerusalem: Yad Ben Zvi Press, pp. 2329.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Greenberg, Reesa (2018), ‘The Labyrinthine Exhibition: A New Genre’, Stedelijk Studies, Special Issue: ‘Lose Yourself: On Labyrinthine Exhibitions as Curatorial Model’, 7, https://stedelijkstudies.com/journal/the-labyrinthine-exhibition-a-new-genre. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hohlfeldt, Marion (2013), ‘The Collective Oeuvre of the GRAV: The Labyrinth and Audience Participation’ (trans. S. Pleasance), Critique d’art: Actualité Internationale de la Littérature Critique sur l’art Contemporain, 4:41, https://journals.openedition.org/critiquedart/8335?lang=en. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kern, Hermann (2000), Through the Labyrinth: Designs and Meanings over 5,000 Years, Munich: Prestel.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Klimke, Martin, Jacco, Pekelder and Scharloth, Joachim (eds) (2011), Between Prague Spring and French May: Opposition and Revolt in Europe, 1960–1980, New York: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Klüser, Bernd and Hegewisch, Katharina (eds) (1991), Die Kunst Der Ausstellung: Eine Dokumentation Dreißig Exemplarischer Kunstausstellungen Dieses Jahrhunderts (trans. A. Stolz), Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Knabb, Ken (ed.) (2006), Situationist International Anthology, Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kok, Annemarie (2019), ‘Do It Yourself! Lessons in Participation in a Dynamic Labyrinth’, in Eric Jorink, Ann-Sophie Lehmann and Bart Ramakers (eds), Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art/Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek, 68:1, Leiden: Brill, pp. 37989.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lovell, Jonathan and Brennan, AnnMarie (2021), ‘The Labyrinth as Immersive Multimedia Environment: Marshall McLuhan at Expo 67’, The Journal of Architecture, 26:2, pp. 147173.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Manor, Dalia (2005), Art in Zion: The Genesis of Modern National Art in Jewish Palestine, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Maor, Haim (1993), ‘Yona Fischer: Information + Concepts’, Studio Art Magazine, 40, pp. 1619.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Marcar, Leeuw Ank (2013), Willem Sandberg – Portrait of an Artist, Amsterdam: Valiz; Arnhe: Werkplaats Typografie.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Matthews, William Henry (1970), Mazes and Labyrinths: Their History and Development, New York: Dover.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McLuhan, Marshall ([1964] 1994), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Nissimi, Hilda (2017), ‘The National Rhetoric of the Israel Museum: Between Zionism and Israeliness’, Iyunim Bitkumat Israel: Studies in Zionism, the Yishuv and the State of Israel, 27, pp. 13873.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. O’Doherty, Brian (1976), Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Obrist, Hans Ulrich (2008), A Brief History of Curating, Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ofrat, Gideon (2004), ‘Why is There No Jewish Surrealism?’, in Within a Local Context, Bnei Brak: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, pp. 42838.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ronen, Meir (1967), ‘Maze at the Israel Museum: Fun, Amusing and Ten Years Late’, Yediot Ahronot, 10 March, p. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Schavemaker, Margriet (2016), ‘Longing for Lost Labyrinths’, in Margriet Schavemaker, Barbara Til and Beat Wismer (eds), Jean Tinguely, Düsseldorf: Museum Palast Düsseldorf, pp. 15560.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Schavemaker, Margriet and Bruijne, Dorine de (eds) (2018), Special Issue: ‘Lose Yourself: On Labyrinthine Exhibitions as Curatorial Model’, Stedelijk Studies, 7, https://stedelijkstudies.com/journal-archive/issue-7-lose-yourself. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Schneede, Uwe M. (1991), ‘Exposition Internationale du Surréalisme, Paris 1938’, in Bernd Klüser and Katharina Hegewisch (eds), Die Kunst der Ausstellung: Eine Dokumentation dreißig exemplarischer Kunstausstellungen dieses Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag, pp. 94101.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Schoenberger, Janna (2018), ‘Ludic Exhibitions at the Stedelijk Museum Die Welt als Labyrinth, Bewogen Beweging, and Dylaby’, Special Issue: ‘Lose Yourself: On Labyrinthine Exhibitions as Curatorial Model’, Stedelijk Studies, 7, https://stedelijkstudies.com/journal/ludic-exhibitions-at-the-stedelijk-museum-die-welt-als-labyrinth-bewogen-beweging-and-dylaby/#_edn38. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sherman, Daniel, van Dijk, Ruud, Alinder, Jasmine and Aneesh, A. (eds) (2013), The Long 1968: Revisions and New Perspectives, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tal, Miriam (1964), ‘From Amsterdam Museum – to Jerusalem’, HaBoker, 20 March, pp. 56.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tal, Miriam (1967), ‘The Labyrinth Exhibition’, Gazit Art Magazine, 24, p. 202.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Tomkins, Calvin (2005), Off the Wall: A Portrait of Robert Rauschenberg, New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Trier, James (2019), Guy Debord, the Situationist International and the Revolutionary Spirit, Leiden: Brill Sense.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Turner, Fred (2008), ‘Romantic Automatism: Art, Technology and Collaborative Labor in Cold War America’, Journal of Visual Culture, 7:1, pp. 526.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Tzel, M. (1965), ‘The Creed of the Decision-Maker in the Israel Museum’, Haaretz, 5 November, p. 10.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. West, Kim (2017), The Exhibitionary Complex: Exhibition, Apparatus and Media from Kulturhuset to the Centre Pompidou 1963–1977, Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm: Södertörn University.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wigley, Mark (1998), Constant’s New Babylon: The Hyper-Architecture of Desire, Rotterdam: Sense.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Woodruff, Lily (2020), Disordering the Establishment: Participatory Art and Institutional Critique in France, 1958–1981, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jcs_00085_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jcs_00085_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error