Ruined intimacy and intimate ruins in Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Loveless (2017) | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-6134
  • E-ISSN: 2040-6142

Abstract

The collapse of the Soviet Union, followed by a period of cultural disorientation, and ensuing the rise of unfettered capitalism, offers scholars a conceptual magnifying glass with which to understand radical social change. Contemporary Russian popular culture, emerging in this unique social context, becomes a privileged venue to scrutinize the nature and implications of radical change. This article explores the transformations of intimacy through the lens of Andrey Zvyagintsev’s latest feature film (2017). This film captures a profound disruption of intimacy in compliance with market principles, technology and social media. Zvyagintsev juxtaposes instances of ruined intimacy with spaces of intimate physical ruins. The article suggests that the cinematic visual meditation on ruins and ruination implicates a more expansive meditation on the transient and permanent aspects of our lives, the intersection between nature and culture, as well as the play between presence and absence. By drawing on Aronson’s (2015) cross-cultural work on emotional frameworks, this article argues that (2017) shows how Aronson’s regime of (rational) choice colonizes the regime of (passionate) faith, with deleterious consequences.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jepc_00009_1
2020-04-01
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andreescu, F. C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Social trauma and distortions of phantasy formations. ’, Psychotherapy and Politics International, 11:3, pp. 21024.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aronson, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Romantic regimes. ’, AEON, 22 October, https://aeon.co/essays/russia-against-the-western-way-of-love. Accessed 28 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Z.. ( 2013), Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds, New York:: John Wiley & Sons;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, J.. ( 2001), The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, J.. ( 2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham and London:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Galt, R.. ( 2006), The New European Cinema: Redrawing the Map, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Giddens, A.. ( 1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ginsberg, R.. ( 2004), The Aesthetics of Ruins, vol. 159, Amsterdam:: Rodopi;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hell, J., and Schöne, A.. ( 2010), Ruins of Modernity, London:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kristeva, J.. ( 1995), New Maladies of the Soul, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Levin, D. M.. ( 1988), The Opening of Vision: Nihilism and the Postmodern Situation, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McGilchrist, I.. ( 2019), The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mulvey, L.. ( 1996), Fetishism and Curiosity, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandel, M. J.. ( 2012), What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, New York:: Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tomlinson, J.. ( 1999), Globalization and Culture, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Turkle, S.. ( 2017), Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, New York:: Hachette UK;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Weldes, J.. ( 2003;), ‘ Popular culture, science fiction, and world politics. ’, in J. Weldes. (ed.), To Seek Out New Worlds, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 127.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams, R.. ( 1989), Resources of Hope: Culture, Democracy, Socialism, London:: Verso;. Rpt. in Tomlinson, J. (1999), Globalization and Culture, University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolynn, M.. ( 2017), It Didn't Start With You: How Inherited Family Trauma Shapes Who We Are and How to End the Cycle, New York:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Zvyagintsev, A.. ( 2003), Vozvrashchenie (The Return), Russia:: Ren Film;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zvyagintsev, A.. ( 2007), Izgnanie (The Banishment), Russia:: Ren-TV;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zvyagintsev, A.. ( 2011), Elena, Russia:: Non-Stop Productions;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zvyagintsev, A.. ( 2014), Leviathan, Russia:: Non-Stop Productions/A Company Russia/Russian Ministry of Culture;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zvyagintsev, A.. ( 2017), Nelyubov (Loveless), Russia:: Fetisoff Illusion/Non-Stop Productions/Wild Bunch;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zvyagintsev, A., and Aguilar, C.. ( 2017;), ‘ Foreign contenders: Andrey Zvyagintsev breaks down the technical aspects of shooting Russia’s melancholic Loveless. ’, MovieMaker, 6 December, https://www.moviemaker.com/archives/moviemaking/directing/foreign-contenders-andrey-zvyagintsev-loveless/. Accessed 7 March 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zvyagintsev, A., and Ganjavie, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Interview: Andrey Zvyagintsev – Loveless. ’, IONCINEMA, 23 February, https://www.ioncinema.com/interviews/interview-andrei-zvyagintsev-loveless. Accessed 7 March 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Andreescu, Florentina C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Ruined intimacy and intimate ruins in Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Loveless (2017). ’, Journal of European Popular Culture, 11:1, pp. 520, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jepc_00009_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jepc_00009_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error