Greece and the Global South: A case of incongruous comparison | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Greek Media & Culture
  4. Volume 8, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 8 Number 2
  • ISSN: 2052-3971
  • E-ISSN: 2052-398X

Abstract

Taking as its starting point the indifference, if not hostility, of postcolonial criticism to examples of modernization and belatedness outside of the western Europe/colony dichotomy, this article considers alternative projects of modernization. To this effect, it proposes the concept of incongruous comparison, defined as an attempt to juxtapose ideas, authors, institutions, texts that do not share a common history or geography. Incongruous comparison highlights both the logic and agreement that traditional conceptions of comparison presume and necessitate and the discordant note that this practice actually strikes. In seeking to reveal as many differences as points of commonality, incongruous comparison is patterned on social communication that requires both symmetry (shared interests, ability to translate into one’s own language) and asymmetry (gaps, disjunctions, misunderstandings, lack of full translation). In order to illustrate this concept, the article brings together two unrelated authors, Adamantios Korais, an influential scholar of the Greek Enlightenment, and Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, one of the most important intellectuals in Latin America of the nineteenth century and president of Argentina. Specifically, it examines how each author used the philosophical conflict between barbarism and civilization in their conception of modernization. It concludes by looking at the work of Lucio V. Mansilla, who, by travelling to the territory of the Ranquel people of the pampas, ended up undoing the barbarian/civilization dichotomy.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jgmc_00055_1
2022-10-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albrecht, Monika. (ed.) ( 2020), Postcolonialism Cross-examined: Multidirectional Perspectives on Imperial and Colonial Pasts and the Neocolonial Present, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Apter, Emily. ( 2013), Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability, New York:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Augustinos, Olga. ( 2008;), ‘ Korais and the discourse of the enlightenment. ’, in K. Zacharia. (ed.), Hellenism: Culture, Identity, and Ethnicity from Antiquity to Modernity, Burlington, VA:: Ashgate;, pp. 169–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Beecroft, Alexander. ( 2015), An Ecology of World Literature: From Antiquity to the Present Day, New York:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boletsi, Maria. ( 2013), Barbarism and Its Discontents, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Boletsi, Maria. (forthcoming 2023), Specters of Cavafy, Ann Arbor, MI:: University of Michigan Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Buettner, Elizabeth. ( 2016), Europe after Empire: Decolonization, Society, and Culture, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Çolak, Hasan. ( 2021;), ‘ Adamantios Korais and his Turkish notes. ’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 39:2, pp. 307–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Creighton, Donald Grant. ( 1937), The Commercial Empire of the St. Lawrence, 1760–1850, Toronto:: Ryerson Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Decolonize Hellas Website ( 2021;), ‘ Decolonize Hellas. ’, https://decolonizehellas.org/en/. Accessed 3 July 2022.
  11. Dussel, Enrique. ( 1995), The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of the ‘Other’ and the Myth of Modernity (trans. M. D.,, Barker.), New York:: Continuum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dussel, Enrique. ( 2000;), ‘ Europe, modernity, and Eurocentrism. ’, Nepantla: Views from South, 1:3, pp. 465–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dussel, Enrique. ( 2002;), ‘ Beyond Eurocentrism: The world-system and the limits of modernity. ’, in H. Y. Jung. (ed.), Comparative Political Culture in the Age of Globalization: An Introductory Anthology (trans. E.,, Mendieta.), Lanham, MD:: Lexington Books;, pp. 57–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dussel, Enrique. ( 2016;), ‘ “Ser Hispano”: Un Mundo en el “Border” de Muchos Mundos. ’, in R. Grosfoguel,, N. M. Torres, and J. D. Saldívar. (eds), Latin@s in the World-System: Decolonizing Struggles in the Twenty-First Century U.S. Empire, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 41–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Escobar, Arturo. ( 2007;), ‘ Worlds and knowledges otherwise: The Latin American modernity/coloniality research program. ’, Cultural Studies, 21:2&3, pp. 179–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillies, Eva. ( 1997;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in A Visit to the Ranquel Indians (trans. E.,, Gillies.), Lincoln, NE:: University of Nebraska Press;, pp. xix–xxxviii.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. González Echevarría, Roberto. ( 2003;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in D. F. Sarmiento. (ed.), Facundo: Civilization and Barbarism (trans. K.,, Ross.), Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gourgouris, Stathis. ( 1996), Dream Nation: Enlightenment, Colonialization, and the Institution of Modern Greece, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Herzfeld, Michael. ( 2002;), ‘ The absent presence: The discourses of crypto-colonialism. ’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 101:4, pp. 899–926.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaenen, Cornelius J.. ( 1982;), ‘ “Les Sauvages Ameriquains”: Persistence into the 18th century of traditional French concepts and constructs for comprehending Amerindians. ’, Ethnohistory, 29:1, pp. 43–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jusdanis, Gregory. ( 2001), The Necessary Nation, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jusdanis, Gregory. ( 2003;), ‘ World literature: The unbearable lightness of thinking globally. ’, Diaspora, 12:1, pp. 103–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Jusdanis, Gregory. ( 2013;), ‘ World literature and the limits of critical discourse. ’, The Savannah Review, 2, pp. 73–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jusdanis, Gregory. ( 2020;), ‘ From Cuzco to Constantinople: Rethinking postcolonialism. ’, in M. Albrecht. (ed.), Postcolonialism Cross-examined: Multidirectional Perspectives on Imperial and Colonial Pasts and the Neocolonial Present, London:: Routledge;, pp. 196–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jusdanis, Gregory. ( 2021;), ‘ From Cuzco to Constantinople: A journey in comparison. ’, Greek Studies Now: Cultural Analysis Network, 17 April, https://gc.fairead.net/from-cuzco-to-constantinople. Accessed 10 June 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kitromilides, Paschalis. ( 2016), Enlightenment and Revolution: The Making of Modern Greece, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Korais, Adamantios. ( 1805), Prodromos ellinikis vivliothikis (‘Precursor to the Greek Library’), Paris:: Firmin Didot;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Korais, Adamantios. ( 1970;), ‘ Report on the present state of civilization in Greece. ’, in E. Kadourie. (ed.), Nationalism in Asia and Africa, New York:: World Publishing;, pp. 153–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Korais, Adamantios. ( 1984), Prolegomena stous archaious ellines syngrafeis (‘Prolegomena to the ancient Greek writers’), vol. 1, Athens:: Morfotiko Idryma Ethnikis Trapezis;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kostis, Kostas. ( 2018), History’s Spoiled Children: The Story of Modern Greece (trans. J.,, Moe.), Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lander, Edgardo. ( 2000;), ‘ Eurocentrism and colonialism in Latin American social thought. ’, Nepantla: Views from South, 1:3, pp. 519–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. López-Alves, Fernando. ( 2011a;), ‘ Modernization theory revisited: Latin America, Europe, and the US in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. ’, Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura, 38:1, pp. 243–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. López-Alves, Fernando. ( 2011b;), ‘ Nation-states and nationalist states: Latin America in comparative context. ’, in M. Hanagan, and C. Tilly. (eds), Contention and Trust in Cities and States, New York:: Springer;, pp. 113–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mansilla, Lucio V.. ( 1966), Una excursión a los Indios Ranqueles, vol. I, Buenos Aires:: Editorial Kapelusz;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mansilla, Lucio V.. ( 1997), A Visit to the Ranquel Indians (trans. E.,, Gillies.), Lincoln, NE:: University of Nebraska Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin, Gerald. ( 1998;), ‘ Literature, music, and the visual arts, 1820–1870. ’, in L. Bethell. (ed.), A Cultural History of Latin America: Literature, Music, and the Visual Arts in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 47–132.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Melas, Natalie. ( 2007), All the Difference in the World: Postcoloniality and the Ends of Comparison, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mignolo, Walter D.. ( 2005), The Idea of Latin America, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Montaigne, Michel de. ( 1958;), ‘ On cannibals. ’, in Anon. (ed.), Essays (trans. and intr. J. M.,, Cohen.), London:: Penguin;, pp. 105–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. O’Gorman, Edmundo. ( 1958), La Invención de América: Investigación acerca de la Estructura Histórica del nuevo Mundo y del Sentido de su Devenir, Mexico City:: Fondo de Cultura Económica;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Petrou, Stamatis. ( 1976), Grammata apo to Amsterdam (‘Letters from Amsterdam’) (ed. P. Iliou.), Athens:: Ermis;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pourgouris, Marinos. ( 2019), The Cyprus Frenzy of 1878 and the British Press, New York:: Lexington Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Quijano, Aníbal. ( 2000;), ‘ Coloniality of power: Eurocentrism and Latin America. ’, Nepantla: Views from South, 1:3, pp. 533–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Quijano, Aníbal. ( 2014;), ‘ Lo público y lo privado: un enfoque latinoamericano. ’, in D. A. Clímaco. (ed.), Cuestiones y Horizontes: Antología Esencial, Buenos Aires:: CLASCO;, pp. 705–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Rahier, Jean Muteba. (ed.) ( 2012), Black Social Movements in Latin America, New York:: Palgrave;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sarmiento, Domingo Faustino. ( 2003), Facundo: Civilization and Barbarism (trans. K.,, Ross.), Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Schleiermacher, Friedrich. ( 2012;), ‘ On the different methods of translating. ’ (trans. S.,, Bernofsky.), in L. Venuti. (ed.), The Translation Studies Reader, , 3rd ed.., New York:: Routledge;, pp. 43–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Scobie, James R.. ( 1974), Buenos Aires: Plaza to Suburb, 1870–1910, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Shumway, Nicolas. ( 1991), The Invention of Argentina, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. ( 2003), Death of a Discipline, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Turner, Frederick Jackson. ( 1965), The Frontier in American History, New York:: Holt;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Jusdanis, Gregory. ( 2022;), ‘ Greece and the Global South: A case of incongruous comparison. ’, Journal of Greek Media & Culture, 8:2, pp. 143–60, https://doi.org/10.1386/jgmc_00055_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jgmc_00055_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Argentina; belatedness; empire; Korais; Mansilla; modernization; postcolonialism; Sarmiento

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error